Menu
Process Forgejo PR feedback with reflection, guardrail-gap classification, and inline thread replies.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Fine-grained outside-in RED-GREEN-REFACTOR microcycles with specialist agents and single-diagnostic implementation.
RGR sequence, observed-failure evidence, drill-down unit tests, and non-behavioral exemptions for Phoenix/Commanded work.
Phoenix 1.8, Postgres, Commanded, Ecto, ExUnit, Dialyzer, and strict static-check conventions.
Phoenix auth/session/CSRF, command authorization, event data sensitivity, Postgres, dependency, secret, and threat-model review triggers.
Classify review feedback and choose proportionate guardrails without inflating default context cost.
Write implementation plans as test-addressed red-green-refactor cycles rather than component waterfalls.
| name | forgejo-feedback-protocol |
| description | Process Forgejo PR feedback with reflection, guardrail-gap classification, and inline thread replies. |
Use this skill for every actionable PR review comment.
tea or the Forgejo REST API.guardrail-gap or one-off using review-taxonomy.Forgejo threads replies by review, path, and diff position. For an inline reply, post to the existing review comments endpoint with:
{
"body": "<reply>",
"path": "<comment.path>",
"new_position": <comment.position>,
"old_position": 0
}
Do not use prose line numbers from the comment body as new_position.
Top-level PR comments are allowed only after all actionable inline threads have a per-thread response.