paper-planning

name	paper-planning
description	Guides pre-writing planning for academic papers with 4 structured steps: story design (task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage), experiment planning (comparisons + ablations), figure design (pipeline + teaser), and 4-week timeline management. Includes counterintuitive planning tactics (write a mock rejection letter to identify weaknesses before writing, narrow before broad claims, design ablations first). Use when: user wants to plan a paper before writing, design story/contributions, plan experiments, create figure sketches, set a writing timeline, or write a pre-emptive rejection letter for planning purposes. Do NOT use for actual writing (use paper-writing), running experiments (use experiment-design/experiment-track/result-analysis), self-reviewing a finished draft (use paper-review), or finding research problems (use idea-generate/idea-evaluate).
allowed-tools	Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
metadata	{"author":"EvoScientist","version":"1.0.0","tags":["core","research","writing","academic-writing","experiment-design"],"source":"EvoScientist/EvoSkills","license":"Apache-2.0"}

Vendored from EvoScientist/EvoSkills (Apache-2.0), adapted for ReadPaperMachine（工具名/交叉引用/Guard/Verify 本地化）。License: references/licenses/EvoSkills-Apache-2.0.txt

Paper Planning

Purpose

一套在正式写作前系统性规划学术论文的方法，覆盖 story design（task-challenge-insight-contribution-advantage 叙事）、experiment planning（对比实验 + ablation）、figure design（pipeline 图 + teaser 图）、以及 4 周写作 timeline 四个环节。它承接已经确定的研究方向或初步方法作为输入，产出 story summary、experiment plan、figure sketch、timeline 等 artifact，供 paper-writing 直接使用。

When to Use This Skill

If you don't yet have an idea, use the idea-generate skill first to find a problem and design a solution (or idea-evaluate to validate one before committing to it).

• User wants to plan a paper before writing
• User asks about structuring a paper's story or contributions
• User needs to plan experiments (comparisons, ablations)
• User wants to design pipeline figures or teaser figures
• User asks about writing timelines or submission schedules

Planning Overview

Paper planning follows four steps, ideally completed before writing begins:

Step 1: Story Design     → What is the narrative? What are the contributions?
Step 2: Experiment Plan   → What experiments prove our claims?
Step 3: Figure Design     → How do we visually communicate the method?
Step 4: Timeline          → When does each section get written?

Steps

Counterintuitive Planning First

Prioritize these counterintuitive rules before regular planning:

1. Write your rejection letter first: Draft the top-5 likely rejection comments ("limited novelty", "missing baseline", "not robust", etc.), then plan experiments that directly preempt each one.
2. Narrow claim before broad claim: Define the smallest defensible core claim first. Expand only after evidence is strong. Over-broad claims fail review more often than narrow strong claims.
3. Design ablations before polishing method text: If a module cannot be ablated cleanly, its contribution claim is weak.
4. Allocate compute to stress tests, not only benchmarks: A single convincing stress-test figure often contributes more than multiple small benchmark gains.
5. Plan a fallback narrative now: If SOTA gain is marginal, predefine a secondary value proposition (efficiency, robustness, fewer assumptions, wider applicability).

See references/counterintuitive-planning.md

---

Step 1: Story Design

The "story" is the logical narrative that connects the problem, insight, method, and results.

Reverse Engineering the Story

Work backwards to build the story:

1. What is the technical problem? — The specific challenge that existing methods cannot solve well
2. What are our contributions? — The concrete technical novelties
3. What are the benefits and new insights? — What advantages does our approach provide?
4. How do we lead into the challenge? — How to frame the task and previous methods to naturally arrive at the challenge

Then write forward: Task → Previous methods → Challenge → Our contributions → Advantages

Core Elements to Define

Before writing any section, clearly articulate:

Element	Question	Example
Task	What problem does this paper address?	"Real-time 3D scene reconstruction"
Challenge	Why can't existing methods solve it well?	"Cannot handle dynamic objects efficiently"
Insight	What key observation drives our approach?	"Motion patterns are temporally sparse"
Contribution	What do we propose?	"Sparse temporal attention for dynamic regions"
Advantage	Why is our approach better?	"Reduces computation while preserving quality"

Starting Point: Pipeline Figure Sketch

Start by drawing a pipeline figure sketch. This forces you to clarify the overall method before writing.

The pipeline figure sketch serves as the paper's visual backbone:

• Draw it before writing anything
• It reveals whether the method is clear enough to explain
• It identifies the novel modules vs. standard components
• It determines subsection structure for the Method section

See references/story-design.md

---

Step 2: Experiment Planning

Plan experiments before writing to avoid discovering gaps late.

Two Categories of Experiments

Comparison Experiments — Prove our method is better:

• Which baseline methods to compare against?
• Which datasets and metrics?
• What is the evaluation protocol?

Ablation Studies — Prove each module is effective:

• Part 1: One big table showing impact of core contributions
• Part 2: Several small tables for design choices and hyperparameters

Planning Checklist

• List all comparison baselines (recent, relevant, SOTA)
• Define evaluation metrics (standard for the task)
• Identify datasets (standard benchmarks + challenging demos)
• List ablation configurations (remove each core component)
• Plan design-choice tables (hyperparameters, input quality, alternatives)
• Plan demo scenarios (challenging data to showcase upper limit)

See references/experiment-planning.md

Experiment Plan Template

Use the template at assets/experiment-plan-template.md to organize your experiment plan.

---

Step 3: Figure Design

The pipeline figure is for highlighting novelty, not for making readers understand. The Method text is what makes readers understand.

Pipeline Figure Principles

• Highlight novelty: The pipeline figure showcases what is new, not just the workflow
• Differentiate from prior work: The figure must look different from previous methods
• Novel modules stand out: If the overall pipeline is standard, zoom in on novel modules
• Focus on clarity of the novel parts; standard components can be simplified

Teaser Figure

The teaser (usually Figure 1) shows the key result at a glance:

• Place it at the top of the first page
• Should be immediately compelling
• Reference it from the Introduction

Visual Quality Matters

Visual polish directly influences review outcomes. See references/figure-design.md for the full visual quality guide (pipeline figures, tables, typography)

---

Step 4: Timeline

4-Week Countdown

Start writing at least 1 month before the deadline.

Week	Tasks
4 weeks before	1. Organize story (core contribution, module motivations). 2. List comparison experiments and ablation studies. 3. Write Introduction first draft.
3 weeks before	1. Finalize the pipeline figure sketch. 2. Write Method first draft (use \todo{} for unsettled details). Deadline: give Introduction + Method draft to advisor.
2 weeks before	Write first drafts of Experiments, Abstract, Related Work.
Last week	Revise paper, polish pipeline figure and teaser, run demos.

Critical: By the end of Week 3, you must send the Introduction and Method drafts to your advisor — otherwise the advisor likely will not have enough time to finish reviewing the paper.

See references/timeline-4week.md for the detailed schedule and progress tracking template.

---

Guard

• 不虚构实验结果、基线数据或文献引用——所有比较对象、数据集、指标必须是真实存在或用户已确认计划采用的
• planning 产物（story summary、experiment plan、figure sketch、timeline）写入用户指定的论文项目目录，或作为会话内输出直接呈现；不写入 vault 的 Papers/ 或 Topics/
• 完成 Story Design 前不得跳过 reject-first 思考（mock rejection letter）——contribution 必须先接受"最挑剔审稿人"的质询
• ablation 设计需先于 Method 文字打磨；无法清晰 ablate 的模块，其 contribution claim 视为薄弱，需在 experiment plan 中标注
• timeline 建议至少提前 4 周开始写作，不得为迎合用户期望而给出不现实的压缩排期

Verify

• story 五要素（task/challenge/insight/contribution/advantage）齐全且逐条落笔
• mock rejection letter（top-5 可能拒稿理由）已生成，并对应到预防性实验或论证
• 实验计划包含 ablation study（核心模块逐一移除的验证），而非仅有对比实验
• pipeline figure sketch 已产出并明确标出 novel modules
• timeline 覆盖到提交前每周任务，且已注明 advisor review 的截止节点

Handoff to Writing

When planning is complete, pass these artifacts to paper-writing:

Artifact	Source Step	Used By
Story summary (task → challenge → insight → contribution → advantage)	Step 1	Introduction
Module Motivation Mapping table	Step 1	Method subsections
Experiment plan (comparisons + ablations + demos)	Step 2	Experiments section
Pipeline figure sketch	Step 1 / Step 3	Method overview + Figure 2
Claim-to-experiment mapping	Step 2	Abstract, Introduction, Experiments
Fallback narrative (if planned)	Counterintuitive Rule 5	Introduction / Conclusion pivot
Rejection-risk table	Counterintuitive Rule 1	Self-review prioritization

---

Reference Navigation

Topic	Reference File	When to Use
Story design	story-design.md	Starting a new paper
Experiment planning	experiment-planning.md	Before running experiments
Timeline	timeline-4week.md	Setting up a writing schedule
Figure design	figure-design.md	Designing pipeline/teaser figures
Experiment plan template	experiment-plan-template.md	Creating a structured experiment plan
Counterintuitive strategy	counterintuitive-planning.md	Increasing acceptance odds with non-obvious planning choices

Handoff to Presentation

If preparing a conference talk or slide deck, the academic-slides skill guides slide creation from your planning artifacts — including translating your story design and pipeline figure into presentation structure.