| name | architecture-diagram |
| version | 1.2.0 |
| description | Build interactive, click-through architecture diagrams for software systems — a self-contained single HTML file with animated step-by-step flows, mode toggles (dev/prod, offline/online, v1/v2), dark/light theme, and a side panel with payload details, plus a companion markdown description. Use when the user wants to visualize or design a system: architecture diagram, service map, data flow, RAG/agentic flow, microservices topology, integration diagram, CI/CD or data/ETL pipeline, multi-agent system, or onboarding diagram — or to design a new service's flows before building. Natural-language triggers: 'I'm building X, what should the flow look like', 'pokaż jak działa system', 'diagram architektury', 'wizualizacja systemu', 'klikany diagram'. Do NOT use for static diagrams that belong inline (Mermaid/PlantUML), slide decks, or printable/PDF handouts — this produces interactive HTML for browser consumption. |
| license | MIT |
Interactive Architecture Diagrams
Build single-file, drop-in HTML pages that let workshop attendees, clients, or new team members click through how a system works — step by step, with animated data packets flowing between nodes, payload details on a side panel, and toggleable modes (offline/online, dev/prod, v1/v2). The aesthetic is dark and didactic-first: bounded nodes, gentle quadratic wires, packets that glow only on the active step — no rainbow gradients. Rebrand via the CSS tokens in assets/css-tokens.css.
When to reach for this skill
| Situation | Use this skill? |
|---|
| "Show me how the auth flow works" (interactive, for a workshop) | Yes |
| "Design the RAG pipeline before we build it" (planning new service) | Yes |
| "Map our microservices and how they communicate" | Yes |
| "Visualize the CI/CD pipeline for onboarding docs" | Yes |
| "Show the data flow through our ETL pipeline" | Yes |
| "Draw an agentic multi-agent system with tool calls" | Yes |
| "Build me an architecture mockup we can iterate on with the team" | Yes |
| "Draw a sequence diagram for the PR" (static, goes in markdown) | No — a Mermaid sequence diagram inline is simpler |
| "Add a diagram to a slide deck or PDF" (static, not interactive) | No — this produces interactive HTML, not images or slides |
| "I just need a static boxes-and-arrows topology" (no flows/steps) | No — a Mermaid flowchart is enough |
The differentiator is interactivity + sequenced data flow: if the value is "click through it and watch what happens", use this skill; if you need a static image, a slide, or an inline diagram, use Mermaid instead.
The mental model
Every diagram has four things:
- Nodes — services, datastores, users, queues, external systems. Each has a role (color) and metadata (tech stack, port, deployment target).
- Flows — named scenarios the user can pick (e.g.
RAG Query, Direct Query, Ingest, Auth). Each flow is an ordered list of steps.
- Steps —
{from, to, color, title, route, payload, desc, chips}. Each step lights up one wire and one target node. (color and title are required — a missing color leaves the wire uncolored, a missing title leaves the panel header blank.)
- Modes — orthogonal toggle (offline/online, dev/prod, v1/v2). Modes can:
- hide/show entire nodes (e.g. Seed only exists offline)
- rename a node (Qdrant → BigQuery)
- swap payload bodies, ports, auth headers, latency chips
Modes are NOT alternative flows. Flows describe scenarios ("user asks a question"); modes describe deployment shape ("on Docker" vs "on Cloud Run").
Workflow when invoked
Step 1 — Capture intent
If the user has uploaded a SOLUTION.md, README, OpenAPI spec, or any architecture description, read it first before asking questions. Extract:
- Service names + tech stack + ports
- Deployment modes (if any)
- Named endpoints/operations and what they do (these become flows)
- For each operation, the chain of internal service calls (these become steps)
Then ask ONLY the gaps. Don't ask things already in the doc.
If there's no doc, ask the user briefly:
- "What system are we drawing?"
- "What are the main flows you want to show? (e.g. login, search, checkout)"
- "Any mode toggles? (offline/online, dev/prod, v1/v2)"
- "Who's the audience? Workshop attendees? Engineers? Clients?"
Step 2 — Plan the topology on paper first
Before writing code, sketch on paper (literally in your head or a scratch file) WHICH services exist, WHERE they sit relative to each other, and WHICH flows connect WHICH nodes. Avoid wire crossings — this is the single biggest readability win. See references/flow-design-patterns.md for layout heuristics.
Quick rules:
- Orchestrator/API gateway in the middle, dependencies fanning out
- User on the far left (entry point), datastores on the right (exit), services in between
- Read-only services above, write-heavy services below (intuitive: data flows down into them)
- Optional/one-shot services (seed jobs, cron) tucked in a corner
Step 3 — Build from the template
Copy assets/template.html to the working directory. It's a fully working drop-in: dark theme, side panel, player controls (play/pause/step), keyboard shortcuts, animated SVG packets, mode toggle. Edit only these regions (the template's top EDIT THESE THINGS comment is the authoritative list):
<title> + <h1> — replace {{SYSTEM_NAME}} and the header text..modepick buttons — mode toggle labels (or remove if single-mode)..flowtabs — one .flowtab per scenario; data-flow must match a flows key..node divs in .stage — one per service: data-id, data-role, style="left/top", label, tech, port.- The
flows object in JS — one entry per scenario, each with an ordered steps[] array.
Conditional: update the .legend only if your roles differ from the defaults; recolor :root CSS variables only for a restyle. After editing, search the file for {{ to catch any stray {{SYSTEM_NAME}}/{{FLOW_*}} placeholders.
Don't reinvent the CSS, the player, the SVG wire renderer, or the side panel — they all work.
Step 4 — Validate before showing the user
After generating, do this self-check:
If puppeteer is available in the environment, take a screenshot to spot-check layout. Code in references/screenshot.js.
Step 5 — Output the files
Always two files:
architecture.html — the interactive diagramarchitecture.md — text description (components, flows step-by-step, mode differences, scenarios for the workshop)
Save to the current working directory. Platform-specific overrides:
- Claude.ai — use
/mnt/user-data/outputs/ instead
- Claude Code / Gemini CLI / OpenCode / Copilot CLI — save to the current working directory (default)
Both should be self-sufficient — someone can read the markdown without opening the HTML, and vice versa.
Step 6 — Present the output
Tell the user where the files were saved and how to open them (open architecture.html on macOS, xdg-open architecture.html on Linux, or just open in browser). If present_files is available (Claude.ai), call it to display the HTML first, then the markdown.
File reference
| File | When to read |
|---|
assets/template.html | Always. This is the starting point you copy and modify. |
assets/css-tokens.css | If user asks to restyle (e.g. light theme, different brand colors). Standalone tokens you can splice into existing CSS. |
references/flow-design-patterns.md | When planning a new system from scratch. Heuristics for node placement, naming flows, sequencing steps, choosing modes. |
references/component-library.md | When building the nodes list. Copy-paste node snippets for User/API/DB/Queue/Cache/LLM/Cron/External/etc. with proper roles and icons. |
references/screenshot.js | When you want to spot-check the result before showing the user. Run with node if puppeteer-core is installed. |
examples/rag-eskadra-bielik.json | Reference example: a real RAG system with 5 flows and offline/online modes. Read for topology layout, offline/online mode design (per-node tech/port swapping), and flow decomposition via step_outline. Payload/chip conventions are in the sections below, not the examples. |
examples/auth-oauth2.json | Reference example: an OAuth2 + session flow with dev/prod modes. Shows redirect flows and external IdP nodes. |
examples/event-driven.json | Reference example: event-driven microservices with Kafka, showing async fan-out flows. |
examples/cicd-pipeline.json | Reference example: CI/CD pipeline with GitHub Actions, staging/prod modes, rollback flow. |
examples/agentic-tool-calling.json | Reference example: agentic AI system with tool calling, single-agent vs multi-agent modes. |
The examples/*.json files are planning specs, not drop-in code — JSON outlines you translate into the template's HTML nodes + inline JS flows object. See references/flow-design-patterns.md → "Example JSON → template mapping" for the field-by-field translation.
Quick reference — node roles and colors
Hardcoded in CSS variables in template.html. Pick one per node:
| Role | Color | Use for |
|---|
user | mint #46f9b8 | Browser, mobile client, end user, CLI user |
orch | sky #6aa9ff | API gateway, orchestrator, BFF, controller |
compute | magenta #ff6b8a | LLM, ML model, expensive compute |
embed | amber #ffc14d | Embedding service, transformer, preprocessor |
vector | violet #b388ff | Database (any), vector store, cache, blob storage |
seed | orange #ff9457 | Cron, one-shot job, migration, seed, scheduled task |
If you need more roles, add CSS variables. Keep the count ≤ 6 — past that, the legend becomes a colorblind nightmare.
If your system has e.g. two distinct datastores (Postgres + Redis), still use vector for both but distinguish via the icon and label, not by inventing a 7th color.
Visual states — what the viewer sees on each step
This is the most important didactic mechanic in the diagram. Understand it before modifying the JS or CSS, or you'll break the "click a flow tab, see the whole path" intuition.
When a user picks a flow tab and lands on step N, every node and wire is classified into one of these states:
| Element | State | Looks like | When |
|---|
| Node | active | Full ring + glow + step-number badge | Target of current step (e.g. LLM when step says "Orch → LLM") |
| Node | active-from | Soft ring, no badge | Source of current step |
| Node | participant | Near-full opacity, slightly desaturated | Appears anywhere else in this flow, just not in this step |
| Node | dimmed | 25% opacity, washed out | Not in this flow at all (e.g. seed during a login flow) |
| Node | hidden | Invisible | Mode-excluded entirely (e.g. seed node in online mode) |
| Wire | active | Bright role color, glow, packet animating | The wire of the current step |
| Wire | preview | Role color at 50% opacity, dashed | Belongs to this flow but not the active step — shows the full path ahead |
| Wire | muted | ~8% opacity | Doesn't belong to this flow |
Why participant matters (and the JS/CSS implementation gotchas) is detailed in references/flow-design-patterns.md → "The participant state". Short version: it lets a viewer see the whole path on the first click, instead of stepping through to discover which nodes a flow uses — that's the entire point of the diagram. If you add node states, keep applyStep and the CSS (.node.participant, .wire.preview) consistent.
Interaction model
The diagram supports five ways to interact, in increasing order of viewer expertise:
| Interaction | What happens | Who uses it |
|---|
| Click flow tab | Jump to step 1 of that flow, side panel updates | Everyone |
| Click Next/Prev (or →/←, Space) | Advance/rewind one step | Workshop attendees walking through |
| Click a node | Jump to the first step where this node appears | Curious viewers exploring |
| Drag a node | Reposition the node on the canvas; wires redraw live | Layout tweakers / presenters |
| Fullscreen (F) | Expand canvas to fill the screen; Escape to exit | Workshop presenters |
Node click vs drag. A 5px movement threshold distinguishes a click (jump to step) from a drag (reposition); pointer events handle mouse and touch alike.
Node click is the easiest to miss when modifying the skill. Three things must be in place:
cursor: pointer on .node (visual affordance — "this is clickable"):hover state that reveals the role color (confirms interactivity)- The JS handler that does
findIndex on the current flow's steps and jumps there
If a node isn't part of the current flow (.dimmed state), clicking it shakes the node instead of doing nothing. Silent ignore is bad UX — the viewer thinks the page is broken.
Keyboard accessibility: nodes have tabIndex=0, Enter/Space triggers the same action as click.
Don't break this when adding features. It's the only way for a viewer to think "wait, where is the LLM used?" and find out instantly. Without it, they'd have to step through all 8 steps just to discover one node's role.
Quick reference — payload format
Payloads in the side panel are monospace + minimal syntax highlight. Keep them realistic but trimmed — show the shape, omit boring fields:
{
payloadOffline:
`POST /ask
{
"query": "Ile kosztuje parking?",
"limit": 3,
"temperature": 0.7
}`
}
Use 4-space indent, no tabs. Use // comments for inline annotations.
If a step is the same in both modes, use payload (single key). If they differ, use payloadOffline + payloadOnline (or whatever the mode names are).
Quick reference — chips (metadata badges)
Chips below the payload are short metadata labels. Two semantic types auto-style themselves:
- Latency (matches
/\d+\s*(?:ms|s|min)\b/) — gets a stopwatch icon, e.g. "~150ms", "5-30s", "timeout 120s"
- Size/count (matches
/dim|×|loaded|rules|count/) — gets a database icon, e.g. "768 dim", "38 loaded", "×N"
- Other — neutral, e.g.
"COSINE", "baseline", "idempotent", "UUID5"
Maximum 3 chips per step. They're hints, not specifications.
Naming conventions
| Thing | Convention | Example |
|---|
| Flow key in JS | snake_case | ask, ask_direct, ingest_text |
| Flow display name | "Title Case (METHOD /route)" | "RAG Query (POST /ask)" |
Node data-id | snake_case, short | orch, vector, embed |
| Mode key | snake_case, descriptive | offline/online, dev/prod, v1/v2 |
| Step title | Polish or English, depending on workshop language. Consistent within one file. | "Pytanie z UI" or "Question from UI" |
Common pitfalls
</script> in payloads breaks everything. If a payload template literal contains the string </script> (e.g. showing an HTML snippet), the browser's HTML parser treats it as the closing tag for the main <script> block — killing all JS. Escape it as <\/script> or </script> inside template literals. This also applies to any </style> or similar closing tags in payload strings.
Source node looks dead. If a step's source node renders dimmed instead of active-from, you regressed the participant logic — see "Visual states".
Wire crossings. Caused by node placement, not code — swap node positions to fix. (The template auto-curves wires in alternating directions per step index, which helps but won't fix a bad layout.)
Too many flows. More than 6 flows clutters the tab bar. If you have 8+, group them: one diagram per group (e.g. "read flows" vs "write flows" as two separate HTML files).
Modes that aren't really modes. If the toggle changes the entire topology (different services, different protocols), it's not a mode — it's a second system. Build two HTML files.
Static screenshots beat live diagrams sometimes. If the diagram will end up in a PDF report, a slide deck, or a printed handout, this skill is the wrong choice — produce a static diagram instead. This skill is for interactive consumption in a browser.
Forgetting the .md. The HTML is the showpiece, but the .md is what people read on GitHub, paste into Slack, and grep for endpoint names. Always generate both.
Polish vs English. Match the workshop language. Bilingual settings typically use Polish for internal workshops and English for client deliverables. Ask if unsure.
Extending the template
If a user asks for something the template doesn't support, here's the difficulty ranking:
| Request | Difficulty | Where to edit |
|---|
| New node | trivial | Add .node div, position via left/top % |
| New flow | trivial | Add entry to flows object |
| New mode (3rd one) | small | Add button to .modepick, extend state.mode switch, add payloadX fields to steps |
| Different brand colors | small | Edit CSS variables in :root (see assets/css-tokens.css) |
| Light theme | built-in | Click the moon/sun button or press T. To make light the default, add class="light" to <body>. |
| Drag-and-drop nodes | built-in | Already supported — drag any node; positions snap to a 48px lattice and persist in localStorage (keyed by page title — give each diagram a unique title, or same-title diagrams on one origin share saved layout). |
| Fullscreen mode | built-in | Press F or click the expand icon. Press Escape to exit. |
| Layout reset | built-in | Press R or click the ↻ button (appears after any drag). |
| Progress bar | built-in | Thin bar below player shows step position in current flow. |
| Parallel steps (two simultaneous wires) | medium | Group steps as {parallel: [step, step]}; player advances both |
| Branching flows (if-then-else) | hard | Currently linear. Either fork into separate flows or add a branch field with UI for picking the branch. |
| Saving state in URL | small | Hash-based: #mode=online&flow=ask&step=3 — parse in boot, update on changes |
Don't promise features the template doesn't support without flagging the work involved.
Iteration tips
When the user gives feedback like "the diagram is too cramped" or "step 5 is confusing":
- "Too cramped" → spread nodes wider; you have 100% width to work with. Don't go below 12% horizontal gap between adjacent nodes.
- "Confusing step" → the step description is doing too much. Split into two steps OR rewrite to focus on ONE handoff (X sends Y to Z, that's it).
- "It doesn't match how it really works" → ask for the actual code path. Don't guess; the diagram has zero value if it lies about reality.
- "Make it pop more" → resist. Didactic clarity > visual punch. Maybe one accent element (a glow on the result node when flow completes) but stop there.
- "Add a legend" → already there. If they want it bigger, increase the
.legend font-size and gap.
