sf-flow

name	sf-flow
plugin	salesforce-core
argument-hint	[create|update|validate] {FlowName} ...
metadata	{"version":"2.2.0"}
description	Creates and validates Salesforce flows with 110-point scoring and Winter '26 best practices using Salesforce MCP server. Use when building record-triggered flows, screen flows, autolaunched flows, scheduled flows, or reviewing existing flow performance. Usage: /sf-flow [create|update|validate] {FlowName} ...

Salesforce Flow Development and Review

Expert Salesforce Flow Builder with deep knowledge of best practices, bulkification, and Winter '26 (API 65.0) metadata. Create production-ready, performant, secure, and maintainable flows using Salesforce MCP server for deployment.

Dispatch

Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine the action:

First argument or intent	Workflow
create, new flow request	Create Flow
update, modify existing flow	Update Flow
validate, review, score	Validate Flow
(no argument or unclear)	Ask the user (see below)

When the operation is missing or unclear, you MUST use AskUserQuestion before proceeding:

AskUserQuestion(question="What would you like to do?\n\n1. **Create** — generate a new Flow\n2. **Update** — fetch, modify, validate, and redeploy\n3. **Validate** — score an existing Flow")

Do NOT guess the operation or default to one. Wait for the user's answer.

---

Approval Processes: Choose the Engine First

When a request is to build an approval (e.g. "create an approval process", "require approval before X", "deal/discount approval", "gate a stage until approved"), do NOT start building until the engine is decided:

Engine	Build with	Use when
Flow Approval Orchestration (recommended)	this skill (processType Orchestrator, record-triggered) + the Setup approval wizard for the approval step	Default. Salesforce's active investment; native record-change auto-trigger; Approval Trace audit log; recall/reassign; Apex-extensible; free (no orchestration credits).
Legacy (classic) Approval Process	sf-metadata (ApprovalProcess metadata type)	Simple single-step manager approvals; need built-in delegate approver; org already standardized on classic.

If the user has not explicitly named the engine, ASK (one question) and recommend Flow Approval Orchestration. Do not default silently.

AskUserQuestion(question="Build this as a **Flow Approval Orchestration** (recommended — record-change auto-trigger, audit trace, Salesforce's strategic direction) or a **legacy Approval Process** (simpler, built-in delegate approver)?")

Set expectations up front (true for BOTH engines):

• An approval process cannot prevent a field transition by itself. To gate (e.g. block Closed Won until approved) you ALSO need a validation rule keyed off either a custom "approved" flag (set by a final-approval field update / background step) or PRIORVALUE(StageName).
• Auto-trigger on record change is native to Flow record-triggered orchestrations; classic needs a separate record-triggered auto-submit flow.
• The orchestration's approval step subtype does not reliably round-trip through the Metadata API — assemble that step in the Setup approval wizard / Flow Builder. Build the supporting approver screen flow and background field-update flow with this skill, then wire them in the wizard.

Minimize metadata round-trips

• Read before update for any element the API replaces wholesale (Layout, ApprovalProcess, StandardValueSet, Flow): fetch current → change the one field → send the complete payload. A partial payload silently drops siblings.
• Use exact metadata element names — do not infer them from the Setup UI label. Known mismatches: recordEditability (NOT recordEditabilityType); the "Submit for Approval" standard button is Submit inside excludeButtons; OpportunityStage values are governed by won/closed/forecastCategory, not just label.
• Batch field/criteria reads into one soql_query / metadata_read instead of one call per item.
• Prefer the surgical tool where one exists (page_layout_update / permission_set_update JSON-Patch) over a full metadata_update rebuild.

---

Action Workflow: Create Flow

Create a new Flow following Winter '26 best practices.

Step 1. Gather requirements

Use AskUserQuestion to collect:

• Flow type: Record-Triggered, Screen, Autolaunched, Scheduled, or Platform Event-Triggered
• Trigger object (if record-triggered): which Salesforce object
• Trigger event (if record-triggered): before save, after save, or both
• Primary purpose: one sentence description
• Special requirements: subflows, invocable actions, external callouts, etc.

Step 2. Check for existing flow

Before generating, confirm the flow doesn't already exist:

metadata_list(
  type="Flow",
  sf_user="<sf_user>"
)

If it exists, suggest running with update <FlowApiName> instead.

Step 3. Generate

Create the flow XML following the sf-flow skill guidelines (see Workflow Design section below):

• Proper API naming conventions (snake_case with descriptive prefix)
• Fault paths on all DML and callout elements
• Bulkification patterns (no DML or SOQL in loops)
• Description and labels on all elements
• runInMode="SystemModeWithoutSharing" only where justified

Step 4. Validate before deploying — REQUIRED, MANUAL

This step is not optional and is not automated. Skipping it has shipped Flows with broken email actions, missing fault paths, and InvalidDraft states that only surface at runtime. A skill-scoped PreToolUse hook (scripts/pre-mcp-validate.py) ships with this skill, but it is not wired up in every runtime environment — until you confirm the hook is registered for your host, treat the manual step below as the contract.

Write the generated metadata to a temp file (/tmp/<FlowApiName>.flow-meta.xml for XML, /tmp/<FlowApiName>.flow.json for JSON), then run:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/sf-flow/scripts/validate_flow_cli.py" "/tmp/<FlowApiName>.flow-meta.xml"

Fix any CRITICAL or HIGH issues before deploying — including missing faultConnector on actionCalls, recordCreates, recordUpdates, recordDeletes, recordLookups, apexPluginCalls, and waits with callouts. A score below 80% (88/110) is a hard stop unless you explicitly state in your response why the deployment is going ahead anyway.

Self-check before every metadata_create / metadata_update / tooling_api_dml call on a Flow. Answer these four questions out loud (in your reasoning) before invoking the tool:

1. Did I write the Flow metadata to a file?
2. Did I run validate_flow_cli.py on that file?
3. Did the validator output appear in my context, with a score and an issue list?
4. Are all CRITICAL/HIGH issues resolved?

If you cannot answer "yes" to all four, do not call the deployment tool. Stop, run the validator, and resume.

Default fault-routing rule for every Flow. Every element that can fault at runtime needs a faultConnector: every actionCalls (email, callout, invocable Apex), every recordCreates / recordUpdates / recordDeletes / recordLookups, every apexPluginCalls, and every waits involving a callout. Routing the fault to a no-op terminal element is acceptable; routing it to the success path is not (it hides failures).

Step 5. Deploy

metadata_create(
  type="Flow",
  metadata=[{"fullName": "<FlowApiName>", "label": "<Flow Label>", "apiVersion": 65, "processType": "<ProcessType>", "status": "Draft", ...}]
)

Step 6. Report

Show the final validation score and deployment status.

---

Action Workflow: Update Flow

Fetch, modify, validate, and redeploy an existing Salesforce Flow.

Parsing the request

The argument should be a flow API name: update Auto_Lead_Assignment do X

If no flow name is given, ask the user which flow to update and what changes are needed.

Step 1. Fetch the current implementation

metadata_read(
  type="Flow",
  fullNames=["<FlowApiName>"],
  sf_user="<sf_user>"
)

If the flow is not found, suggest running with create instead.

Step 2. Read and understand

Review the existing flow XML before making any changes. Understand:

• Flow type and trigger configuration
• Existing element names and labels
• What the requested change affects

Step 3. Apply changes

Modify the flow following sf-flow skill guidelines. Preserve:

• Existing element names and API references (other flows/components may reference them)
• Existing fault paths and error handling
• Description and label conventions already in use

Step 4. Validate before deploying — REQUIRED, MANUAL

The same four-question self-check from the Create workflow applies here. The hook is not guaranteed to be wired up; the manual validator run is the contract. Write the updated metadata to a temp file and validate:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/sf-flow/scripts/validate_flow_cli.py" "/tmp/<FlowApiName>.flow-meta.xml"

Fix any CRITICAL or HIGH issues before deploying. Score below 80% (88/110) is a hard stop unless you can explain why the deployment is going ahead anyway.

Step 5. Deploy

metadata_update(
  type="Flow",
  metadata=[{"fullName": "<FlowApiName>", "label": "<Flow Label>", "apiVersion": 65, "processType": "<ProcessType>", "status": "Draft", ...}]
)

Step 6. Report

Summarise the changes made and show the final validation score.

---

Action Workflow: Validate Flow

Validate one or more Flows using the 110-point static analysis pipeline and return a scored report.

Parsing the request

Input after validate	Interpretation
Auto_Lead_Assignment	Flow API name — fetch XML from org, validate
force-app/.../Auto_Lead_Assignment.flow-meta.xml (ends .flow-meta.xml or .xml)	Local file — validate directly
Auto_Lead_Assignment,Screen_Case_Intake	Comma-separated list — bulk fetch, validate each
All	All Flow records in the org
(no argument)	Ask the user what to validate

Validation script

The validation script is at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/sf-flow/scripts/validate_flow_cli.py. Locate it with:

# $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT is set by Claude Code. Other hosts: see references/execution-modes.md.
# If not set, find the script:
find ~/.claude/plugins -name "validate_flow_cli.py" 2>/dev/null | grep sf-flow | head -1

Local file

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/sf-flow/scripts/validate_flow_cli.py" "<file_path>"

Flow API name (fetch from org)

1. Fetch the Flow XML:

metadata_read(
  type="Flow",
  fullNames=["<FlowApiName>"],
  sf_user="<sf_user>"
)

2. Write the XML content to a temp file:

Write /tmp/validate_<FlowApiName>.flow-meta.xml  ← the flow XML

3. Validate:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/sf-flow/scripts/validate_flow_cli.py" "/tmp/validate_<FlowApiName>.flow-meta.xml"

4. Delete the temp file after validation.

Comma-separated list

Fetch all flow XML bodies in a single call:

metadata_read(
  type="Flow",
  fullNames=["Flow1", "Flow2", "Flow3"],
  sf_user="<sf_user>"
)

Fallback: If the bulk read fails (timeout or size error), fall back to individual metadata_read calls per flow.

Validate each flow body (write → validate → delete). After all flows are validated, show a summary table sorted by score ascending (worst first):

Flow	Score	%	Status
Before_Opportunity_Validate	72/110	65%	Below threshold
Auto_Lead_Assignment	98/110	89%	Pass

All

1. Fetch all flow names:

metadata_list(type="Flow", sf_user="<sf_user>")

2. Fetch flow XML in batches of 20 (large flows can make bigger batches fail):

metadata_read(
  type="Flow",
  fullNames=["Flow1", ..., "Flow20"],
  sf_user="<sf_user>"
)

Backoff strategy: If a batch of 20 fails (timeout or response size error), retry with 10, then 5, then fall back to individual reads for that batch.

3. Validate each flow (write → validate → delete).
4. Show the summary table sorted by score ascending.
5. Highlight any below 88/110 (80%) as requiring attention.

---

📋 Quick Reference: Validation and Deployment

Flow Creation & Deployment Workflow:

1. Call org_init (REQUIRED - one per session)
2. Generate Flow metadata (JSON object — NOT XML)
3. Deploy via metadata_create tool (Salesforce MCP server)
4. Retrieve existing flows via metadata_read or metadata_list (Salesforce MCP server)
5. Query Flow metadata via tooling_api_query for FlowDefinition
6. Describe objects/fields via sobject_describe before flow creation

Scoring: 110 points across 6 categories. Minimum 88 (80%) for deployment. Trivial flows (single-step automations, test/throwaway flows) are exempt from the minimum threshold — score them for informational purposes but do not block deployment. Guardrail anti-pattern checks (DML in loops, missing fault paths) still apply regardless of complexity.

---

Execution modes

This skill supports four execution modes — see references/execution-modes.md for detection logic and full details, and references/mcp-pagination.md for handling large MCP responses.

All Flow operations go through MCP tools regardless of mode. The mode determines whether local tooling (filesystem, code execution) is available for post-processing and how large query results are retrieved.

---

Core Responsibilities

1. Flow Generation: Create well-structured Flow metadata (JSON) from requirements
2. Strict Validation: Enforce best practices with comprehensive checks and scoring
3. the Salesforce MCP server Integration: Deploy via metadata_create, retrieve via metadata_read/metadata_list
4. Testing Guidance: Provide type-specific testing checklists and verification steps

---

⚠️ CRITICAL: Salesforce MCP server Setup

BEFORE using any Salesforce MCP tools:

org_init()

Call with no parameters — uses the default org. If a default is configured, confirm with the user before proceeding. If no default is configured, ask for the Salesforce user/alias.

This initializes your Salesforce org connection. It must be called once per session before using any of these Salesforce MCP tools:

• metadata_create (deploy flows)
• metadata_read (retrieve flows)
• metadata_list (list existing flows)
• tooling_api_query (query FlowDefinition)
• sobject_describe (verify objects/fields)
• soql_query (query org data)

---

⚠️ CRITICAL: Orchestration Order

sf-metadata → sf-flow → sf-data (you are here: sf-flow with the Salesforce MCP server)

⚠️ Flow references custom object/fields? Create with sf-metadata FIRST. Deploy objects BEFORE flows.

1. sf-metadata  → Create objects/fields (local)
2. sf-flow               ◀── YOU ARE HERE (create flow, deploy via MCP)
3. sf-data               → Create test data (remote - objects must exist!)

See references/orchestration.md for extended orchestration patterns including Agentforce.

---

🔑 Key Insights

Insight	Details
Before vs After Save	Before-Save: same-record updates (no DML), validation. After-Save: related records, emails, callouts
Test with 251	Batch boundary at 200. Test 251+ records for governor limits, N+1 patterns, bulk safety
$Record context	Single-record, NOT a collection. Platform handles batching. Never loop over $Record
$Record traversal	$Record supports relationship traversal: {!$Record.Contact__r.FirstName}, {!$Record.Account__r.Name}. Do NOT use Get Records for data already available through $Record lookups — this wastes a SOQL query
Transform vs Loop	Transform: data mapping/shaping (30-50% faster). Loop: per-record decisions, counters, varying logic. See references/transform-vs-loop-guide.md

---

Fast Path (Simple Requests)

For simple, self-contained flows (single record update, basic field mapping, straightforward screen flow), bypass the detailed requirements/design elaboration and full scoring while still performing initialization and mandatory guardrails, then generate + deploy:

1. Call org_init() (always required)
2. Use sobject_describe to verify the target object/fields exist
3. Generate the flow metadata as JSON
4. Run guardrail checks (anti-patterns only — skip full 110-point scoring)
5. Deploy via metadata_create
6. Verify deployment

Use the fast path when: the request is explicit, the flow is a single straightforward automation, and there are no ambiguous requirements.

Use the full 5-phase workflow when: the flow involves multiple decision branches, screen flows with complex logic, subflow orchestration, or underspecified requirements.

---

Workflow Design (5-Phase Pattern)

Phase 1: Requirements Gathering

Before building, evaluate alternatives: See references/flow-best-practices.md Section 1 "When NOT to Use Flow" - sometimes a Formula Field, Validation Rule, or Roll-Up Summary Field is the better choice.

If the request is underspecified, ask concise follow-up questions to gather:

• Flow type (Screen, Record-Triggered After/Before Save/Delete, Platform Event, Autolaunched, Scheduled)
• Primary purpose (one sentence)
• Trigger object/conditions (if record-triggered)

Pre-Development Planning: For complex flows, document requirements and sketch logic before building. See references/flow-best-practices.md Section 2 "Pre-Development Planning" for templates and recommended tools.

Then:

1. Initialize: Call org_init() with no parameters. If a default org is configured, confirm with the user. If no default, ask for the Salesforce user/alias before proceeding.
2. Use sobject_describe to verify object/field existence before referencing
3. Use metadata_list to check existing flows: metadata_list(type="Flow")
4. Offer reusable subflows: Sub_LogError, Sub_SendEmailAlert, Sub_ValidateRecord, Sub_UpdateRelatedRecords, Sub_QueryRecordsWithRetry → See references/subflow-library.md
5. If complex automation: Reference references/governance-checklist.md
6. Keep an internal checklist: Gather requirements, select template, generate flow metadata (JSON), validate, deploy, test

Phase 2: Flow Design & Template Selection

Select template:

Flow Type	Template File
Screen	screen-flow-template.xml
Record-Triggered	record-triggered-*.xml
Platform Event	platform-event-flow-template.xml
Autolaunched	autolaunched-flow-template.xml
Scheduled	scheduled-flow-template.xml
Wait Elements	wait-template.xml

Element Pattern Templates (assets/elements/):

Element	Template	Purpose
Loop	loop-pattern.xml	Complete loop with nextValueConnector/noMoreValuesConnector
Get Records	get-records-pattern.xml	All recordLookups options (filters, sort, limit)
Delete Records	record-delete-pattern.xml	Filter-based and reference-based delete patterns

JSON Deployment Reference (assets/json-deployment-reference.md): Covers XML-to-JSON translation, property placement rules, start patterns for all flow types, entry conditions (filterFormula vs filters), value reference patterns, and element JSON examples. For metadata_create deployments, this reference alone is usually sufficient — the XML templates are optional structural references for complex or unfamiliar flow types.

Template Path Resolution (try in order):

1. Resolve paths relative to the skill root under assets/[template]
2. For element snippets, resolve paths under assets/elements/[template]

When to read XML templates: Only when dealing with complex or unfamiliar element patterns (e.g., wait elements, advanced screen flows). For standard record-triggered, autolaunched, and scheduled flows, the JSON deployment reference has all the patterns needed.

Example: Read: assets/record-triggered-after-save.xml

Naming Convention (Recommended Prefixes):

Flow Type	Prefix	Example
Record-Triggered (After)	Auto_	Auto_Lead_Assignment, Auto_Account_Update
Record-Triggered (Before)	Before_	Before_Lead_Validate, Before_Contact_Default
Screen Flow	Screen_	Screen_New_Customer, Screen_Case_Intake
Scheduled	Sched_	Sched_Daily_Cleanup, Sched_Weekly_Report
Platform Event	Event_	Event_Order_Completed
Autolaunched	Sub_ or Util_	Sub_Send_Email, Util_Validate_Address

Format: [Prefix]_Object_Action using PascalCase (e.g., Auto_Lead_Priority_Assignment)

Screen Flow Button Config (CRITICAL):

Screen	allowBack	allowFinish	Result
First	false	true	"Next" only
Middle	true	true	"Previous" + "Next"
Last	true	true	"Finish"

Rule: allowFinish="true" required on all screens. Connector present → "Next", absent → "Finish".

Orchestration: For complex flows (multiple objects/steps), suggest Parent-Child or Sequential pattern.

• CRITICAL: Record-triggered flows CANNOT call subflows via metadata deployment. Use inline orchestration instead. See references/xml-gotchas.md and references/orchestration-guide.md

Phase 3: Flow Generation & Deployment (via MCP)

Two deployment formats — know which to use:

Path	Format	When
metadata_create / metadata_update	JSON object	Deploying via Salesforce MCP server
Writing .flow-meta.xml to force-app/	XML	Source-controlled project files

CRITICAL: Do NOT pass XML strings to metadata_create. It requires a structured JSON object — use the format reference and examples below. The XML templates in assets/ are the correct reference when writing local .flow-meta.xml files.

Generate flow metadata: Construct the complete Flow metadata as a JSON object with:

• API Version: 65.0
• Proper alphabetical property ordering
• All required metadata fields (label, processType, status, etc.)

CRITICAL Requirements:

• Alphabetical property ordering at root level
• NO bulkSupport property (removed API 60.0+)
• Auto-Layout: all locationX/locationY = 0
• Fault paths on all DML operations

JSON Format Reference

Read assets/json-deployment-reference.md for the complete reference — it covers XML-to-JSON translation, start patterns for all flow types, entry conditions, value references, and element JSON examples.

Essential rules (always apply):

1. Format: metadata_create requires a JSON object, NOT XML. The XML templates in assets/ show structure; translate using the reference above.
2. Property placement: triggerType, recordTriggerType, object, schedule, filters/filterFormula/filterLogic belong ONLY inside start, never at top level.
3. Value wrappers: {"stringValue": "text"}, {"booleanValue": true}, {"numberValue": 100}, {"elementReference": "var_Name"}.
4. Merge fields: stringValue supports {!$Record.Name} syntax — no need for formula variables for simple string interpolation.
5. Entry conditions: Use filterFormula for compound/negated conditions (AND(), OR(), NOT()). Use filters array for simple field comparisons.
6. Shell template: Start from the Flow Shell Template below (Lesson 9) for the complete JSON boilerplate with all element arrays.

Pre-Deployment: Check Prerequisites (REQUIRED for flows referencing custom fields/objects):

Before deploying a flow, verify that all referenced custom fields and objects exist in the target org. Flows referencing missing fields will deploy but become InvalidDraft and cannot be activated.

# Check if custom field exists before deploying flow that references it
sobject_describe(sObject="Lead")
# Verify TEST_Priority__c (or any custom field) appears in the field list
# If missing: create the field FIRST via sobject_field_create, then deploy the flow

Deploy via MCP:

# Initialize connection (ONCE per session)
org_init(sf_user="your-username")

# Create/deploy Flow — pass a JSON object, NOT XML
metadata_create(
    type="Flow",
    metadata=[{
        "fullName": "Auto_Lead_Assignment",
        "label": "Auto Lead Assignment",
        "apiVersion": 65,
        "description": "Assigns new leads to the appropriate queue based on region",
        "environments": ["Default"],
        "processMetadataValues": [
            {"name": "BuilderType", "value": {"stringValue": "LightningFlowBuilder"}},
            {"name": "CanvasMode", "value": {"stringValue": "AUTO_LAYOUT_CANVAS"}}
        ],
        "processType": "AutoLaunchedFlow",
        "start": {
            "locationX": 0, "locationY": 0,
            "object": "Lead",
            "recordTriggerType": "Create",
            "triggerType": "RecordAfterSave",
            "connector": {"targetReference": "Check_Region"}
        },
        "decisions": [...],
        "recordUpdates": [...],
        "status": "Draft"
    }],
    sf_user="your-username"
)

Post-Deployment: Verify Flow Status (REQUIRED after every metadata_create for Flow):

After deploying a flow, immediately query its status via the Tooling API to detect InvalidDraft. This catches issues the Metadata API accepts silently.

# Check flow status after deployment
tooling_api_query(
    sObject="Flow",
    fields=["Id", "Definition.DeveloperName", "VersionNumber", "Status"],
    whereClause="Definition.DeveloperName = 'Auto_Lead_Assignment'"
)
# Expected: Status = "Draft"
# If Status = "InvalidDraft":
#   1. Check for missing triggerType (scheduled flows need triggerType=Scheduled)
#   2. Check for missing custom field references (sobject_describe to verify)
#   3. Fix the issue and redeploy via metadata_update

Common InvalidDraft Causes and Fixes:

Cause	Symptom	Fix
Missing triggerType in start	Scheduled flow with schedule but no triggerType: Scheduled	Add triggerType: "Scheduled" to start element
Missing custom field	Flow references Custom_Field__c that doesn't exist	Create field via sobject_field_create first, then redeploy
Deprecated bulkSupport	API 60.0+ flow includes bulkSupport	Remove the bulkSupport property
Missing recordTriggerType	Record-triggered flow without recordTriggerType	Add recordTriggerType: "Create" (or Update/CreateAndUpdate)
Missing locationX/locationY on start	Required field is missing: locationX on create	Always include "locationX": 0, "locationY": 0 on the start element, even for auto-layout flows

For Review — validate an existing flow from the org or a local file before modifying:

• python scripts/validate_flow_cli.py <FlowApiName> — fetch and validate a single flow from the org
• python scripts/validate_flow_cli.py All — full org audit sorted by score

Validation (STRICT MODE):

• BLOCK: Invalid structure, missing required fields (apiVersion/label/processType/status), API <65.0, broken refs, DML in loops
• WARN: Property ordering, deprecated properties, non-zero coords, missing fault paths, unused vars, naming violations

New v2.0.0 Validations:

• storeOutputAutomatically detection (data leak prevention)
• Same-object query anti-pattern (recommends $Record usage)
• Complex formula in loops warning
• Missing filters on Get Records
• Null check after Get Records recommendation
• Variable naming prefix validation (var*, col*, rec*, inp*, out_)

Validation Report Format (6-Category Scoring 0-110):

Score: 92/110 ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very Good
├─ Design & Naming: 18/20 (90%)
├─ Logic & Structure: 20/20 (100%)
├─ Architecture: 12/15 (80%)
├─ Performance & Bulk Safety: 20/20 (100%)
├─ Error Handling: 15/20 (75%)
└─ Security: 15/15 (100%)

Strict Mode: If ANY errors/warnings → Block with options: (1) Apply auto-fixes, (2) Show manual fixes, (3) Generate corrected version. DO NOT PROCEED until 100% clean.

⛔ GENERATION GUARDRAILS (MANDATORY)

BEFORE generating ANY Flow metadata, VERIFY no anti-patterns are introduced.

If ANY of these patterns would be generated, STOP and ask the user:

"I noticed [pattern]. This will cause [problem]. Should I: A) Refactor to use [correct pattern] B) Proceed anyway (not recommended)"

Anti-Pattern	Impact	Correct Pattern
After-Save updating same object without entry conditions	Infinite loop (critical)	MUST add entry conditions: "Only when [field] is changed"
Get Records inside Loop	Governor limit failure (100 SOQL)	Query BEFORE loop, use collection variable
Create/Update/Delete Records inside Loop	Governor limit failure (150 DML)	Collect in loop → single DML after loop
Apex Action inside Loop	Callout limits	Pass collection to single Apex invocation
Fallible element in RecordAfterSave flow without faultConnector	Blocks the originating save (CANNOT_EXECUTE_FLOW_TRIGGER). Applies to recordCreates, recordUpdates, recordDeletes, recordLookups, and actionCalls (incl. emailSimple, callouts, platform events, custom notifications)	Add faultConnector to every fallible element. If save-gating is intentional, use RecordBeforeSave and document in description
Get Records without null check	NullPointerException	Add Decision: "Records Found?" after query
storeOutputAutomatically=true in system-mode flow with sensitive data	Security risk (retrieves ALL fields)	Use explicit field selection only when flow runs in system mode AND queries objects with sensitive fields (SSN, credit card, etc.)
Query same object as trigger in Record-Triggered	Wasted SOQL	Use {!$Record.FieldName} directly
Get Records for data available via $Record lookup	Wasted SOQL	Use {!$Record.Lookup__r.Field} — traversal works up to 5 levels
Hardcoded Salesforce ID	Deployment failure across orgs	Use input variable or Custom Label
Get Records without filters	Too many records returned	Always include WHERE conditions

DO NOT generate anti-patterns even if explicitly requested. Ask user to confirm the exception with documented justification.

Phase 4: Deployment & Integration (via Salesforce MCP)

the Salesforce MCP server Deployment Pattern:

1. Initialize connection (once per session):

org_init()

1. Deploy Flow metadata (JSON, not XML):

Validation is your job, not the hook's. A PreToolUse hook (scripts/pre-mcp-validate.py) ships with this skill, but it is not wired up in every runtime environment. Always run validate_flow_cli.py manually on the metadata file before calling metadata_create, metadata_update, or tooling_api_dml on a Flow. Block deployment for CRITICAL/HIGH issues; treat score below 80% (88/110) as a hard stop unless you explicitly state why you're proceeding anyway. See the four-question self-check in the Create workflow above.

# Pass a structured JSON object — see org_init instructions for format examples
metadata_create(
    type="Flow",
    metadata=[{
        "fullName": "Auto_Lead_Assignment",
        "label": "Auto Lead Assignment",
        "apiVersion": 65,
        "processType": "AutoLaunchedFlow",
        "status": "Draft",
        # ... full flow structure as JSON properties
    }],
    sf_user="your-salesforce-username"
)

1. Retrieve existing flows (to review or modify):

metadata_read(
    type="Flow",
    fullNames=["Auto_Lead_Assignment"],
    sf_user="your-salesforce-username"
)

1. List all flows (for reference):

metadata_list(
    type="Flow",
    sf_user="your-salesforce-username"
)

1. Query Flow metadata (Tooling API):

tooling_api_query(
    sObject="FlowDefinition",
    fields=["Id", "ApiName", "Description"],
    whereClause="Status = 'Active'",
    sf_user="your-salesforce-username"
)

1. Verify object/fields before flow creation:

sobject_describe(
    sObject="Account",
    sf_user="your-salesforce-username"
)

For Agentforce Flows: Variable names must match Agent Script input/output names exactly.

For complex flows: references/governance-checklist.md

Deleting a Flow Version (Recovering Stuck Versions)

If tooling_api_dml delete on a Flow version returns DEPENDENCY_EXISTS referencing a FlowInterview, query and delete the blocking interviews first:

# Find blocking interviews for the flow version
soql_query(
    sObject="FlowInterview",
    fields=["Id", "Name", "InterviewStatus", "FlowVersionViewId"],
    whereClause="FlowVersionViewId = '<flow_version_id_truncated_to_15>'"
)

# Delete failed/errored interviews from prior runs
sobject_dml(
    operation="delete",
    sObject="FlowInterview",
    recordIds=["<interview_id_1>", "<interview_id_2>"]
)

# Now retry the Flow version delete
tooling_api_dml(
    operation="delete",
    sObject="Flow",
    recordId="<flow_version_id>"
)

FlowInterview records with InterviewStatus = 'Error' (failed runs) are the most common blockers. They persist even after the flow is deactivated, and Salesforce will not let you delete a Flow version while any interview references it.

This commonly happens in demo/dev orgs that have run the flow with intentionally-failing inputs (e.g. unverified email domain causing fault-path runs). It does not typically happen in production.

Phase 5a: Failure-Mode Review (REQUIRED before declaring done)

Before declaring a flow complete, walk through this checklist. Each question maps to a concrete metadata pattern; if the answer reveals an unhandled case, fix it before activation.

1. What happens if an external action fails? (email server down, callout timeout, platform event subscriber rejecting, custom notification fails to deliver.) → faultConnector on every actionCalls element.

2. What happens if a referenced record doesn't exist or the user lacks access? → null check on every recordLookups, plus faultConnector.

3. What happens if the flow re-fires on the same record? Edits, rollups, trigger order can re-fire your flow on records it already processed. → Idempotency guard: dedup flag (*_Notified__c, *_Processed__c) checked in entry conditions, OR ISCHANGED() guard on the field that drives the action.

4. What happens under bulk DML (200+ records in one transaction)? → No DML in loops; no SOQL in loops; $Record is the single record context, not a collection.

5. What happens if a downstream flow this one triggers also fails? → Decide if cascade-blocking is OK; if not, route to side-effect pattern.

6. Which category is this flow? Side-effect or save-gating? Is the description clear about the intent so the next maintainer knows?

This checklist takes 60 seconds and catches the failure modes the validator can't see (intent, idempotency design, downstream cascading).

Phase 5: Testing & Documentation

Type-specific testing: See references/testing-guide.md | references/testing-checklist.md | references/wait-patterns.md (Wait element guidance)

Quick reference:

• Screen: Setup → Flows → Run, test all paths/profiles
• Record-Triggered: Create record, verify Debug Logs, bulk test 200+ records
• Autolaunched: Apex test class, edge cases, bulkification
• Scheduled: Verify schedule, manual Run first, monitor logs

Best Practices: See references/flow-best-practices.md for:

• Three-tier error handling strategy
• Multi-step DML rollback patterns
• Screen flow UX guidelines
• Bypass mechanism for data loads

Security: Test with multiple profiles. System mode requires security review.

Completion Summary:

✓ Flow Creation & Deployment Complete: [FlowName]
  Type: [type] | API: 65.0 | Status: [Draft/Active]
  Deployed via: Salesforce MCP server (metadata_create)
  Validation: PASSED (Score: XX/110)
  Org: [target-org-username]

  Navigate: Setup → Process Automation → Flows → "[FlowName]"

Next Steps: Test (unit, bulk, security), Review docs, Activate if Draft, Monitor logs
Resources: `assets/`, `references/subflow-library.md`, `references/orchestration-guide.md`, `references/governance-checklist.md`

Best Practices (Built-In Enforcement)

⛔ CRITICAL: Save-blocking is opt-in, not opt-out

No record-triggered flow should block the originating save unless blocking is an explicit, stated requirement. This is the single most important architectural rule in this skill — it overrides every other consideration except security.

Why this matters: in a RecordAfterSave flow, any unhandled fault in any element propagates back to the originating DML as CANNOT_EXECUTE_FLOW_TRIGGER, blocking the save. From the user's perspective, the record appears to fail to save — when in reality the save would have succeeded but a downstream side effect (an email server, a callout, a custom notification) failed. The wrong incident gets paged: the team spends the afternoon debugging an "opportunity creation bug" that is actually an email outage.

Classify every record-triggered flow before designing it:

Category	Trigger type	Fault handling	Examples
Side-effect flow (default)	RecordAfterSave	Every fallible element MUST have a faultConnector	Notifications, logging, integrations, derived-field computation, async work
Save-gating flow (explicit)	RecordBeforeSave	Faults intentionally propagate; document why in description	Validation that the platform's validation rules can't express, regulatory gates, anti-fraud checks

If you can't articulate which category your flow belongs to, it's a side-effect flow — handle the faults.

The fallible elements (every one of these can fail at runtime and must have a faultConnector in a side-effect flow):

• recordCreates, recordUpdates, recordDeletes — DML failures (validation rules, permission errors, locked rows, governor limits)
• recordLookups — query failures, permission errors, missing records
• actionCalls — this is the one that gets missed. emailSimple, emailAlert, custom notifications, platform events, Apex invocable methods, external callouts, and Send Custom Notification all sit under actionCalls. Email in particular fails for reasons completely outside the flow's control (unverified domain, suppressed recipient, bounce rules, deliverability configuration). Missing a fault connector here is the most common way a notification flow becomes a save-blocking incident.
• subflows — the called subflow can fault; that fault propagates up
• waits — alarm/event resume can fault

Save-gating flows must be documented. When you do legitimately want to block a save (i.e. the save shouldn't happen if the flow can't complete), the description field of the flow must say so explicitly. Future maintainers must be able to tell whether the absence of a fault connector is intentional or a bug. Suggested phrasing:

"Save-gating: this flow validates X before allowing the record to save. Faults are intentionally propagated to block invalid saves."

⛔ CRITICAL: Record-Triggered Flow Architecture

NEVER loop over triggered records. $Record = single record; platform handles batching.

Pattern	OK?	Notes
$Record.FieldName	✅	Direct field access
$Record.Lookup__r.FieldName	✅	Relationship traversal — NO Get Records needed
$Record.Account__r.Owner.Name	✅	Multi-level traversal (up to 5 levels)
Get Records for $Record lookup	❌	Wastes SOQL — use $Record.Relationship__r.Field instead
Loop over $Record__c	❌	Process Builder pattern, not Flow
Loop over $Record	❌	$Record is single, not collection

$Record relationship traversal: In record-triggered flows, $Record provides access to related records through lookup/master-detail fields WITHOUT a Get Records element. Use {!$Record.Contact__r.FirstName} instead of querying Contact separately. Only use Get Records when you need related records that are NOT accessible through $Record lookups (e.g., child records, or records with no relationship to the trigger object).

Loops for RELATED records only: Get Records → Loop collection → Assignment → DML after loop

⛔ CRITICAL: No Parent Traversal in Get Records

recordLookups cannot query Parent.Field (e.g., Manager.Name). Solution: Two Get Records - child first, then parent by Id.

recordLookups Best Practices

Element	Recommendation	Why
getFirstRecordOnly	Set to true for single-record queries	Avoids collection overhead
storeOutputAutomatically	Set to true (default)	Simpler, modern approach — auto-stores all fields. Only set to false with explicit field selection when handling sensitive data in system-mode flows
assignNullValuesIfNoRecordsFound	Set to false	Preserves previous variable value
faultConnector	Always include	Handle query failures gracefully
filterLogic	Use and for multiple filters	Clear filter behavior

Critical Requirements

• API 65.0: Latest features
• No DML in Loops: Collect in loop → DML after loop (causes bulk failures otherwise)
• Bulkify: For RELATED records only - platform handles triggered record batching
• Fault Paths: All DML must have fault connectors
  • ⚠️ Fault connectors CANNOT self-reference - Error: "element cannot be connected to itself"
  • Route fault connectors to a DIFFERENT element (dedicated error handler)

Fault-destination rubric

When you add a faultConnector, the question "where does it go?" has five common answers, each with a different trade-off. Pick deliberately:

Fault destination	When to use	Trade-off
Terminating end (no further connector after the fault element)	Transient external failure; OK to retry on next edit; flow is genuinely fire-and-forget	Can re-fire repeatedly until the external dependency recovers — noisy logs
Same dedup/idempotency step as success path (e.g., set a *_Notified__c flag whether or not the email actually sent)	One-shot side effect; "best effort" semantics; want to avoid retry storms	Lost work stays lost — no auto-recovery when the external dependency comes back
Error-log object (Flow_Error__c or similar)	Production org with observability requirements; want failures investigable	Requires the log object to exist and be writable in flow context
Platform event	Multiple downstream subscribers need to know about failures (monitoring, alerting, retry handlers)	Heavier; only worth it when something actually subscribes
Continue down the same path after a best-effort attempt	The failed action was optional enrichment, not core to the flow's purpose	Hides failures unless logged; use sparingly

Default for most side-effect flows: terminating end OR same-as-success dedup step. Pick the dedup-step pattern when the cost of duplicate notifications/work is high; pick the terminating-end pattern when transient recovery is desirable.

• Auto-Layout: All locationX/Y = 0 (cleaner git diffs)
  • UI may show "Free-Form" dropdown, but locationX/Y = 0 IS Auto-Layout in metadata
• No Parent Traversal: Use separate Get Records for relationship field data

Property Ordering (CRITICAL)

All properties of the same type MUST be grouped together. Do NOT scatter them across the object.

Complete alphabetical order:

apiVersion → assignments → constants → decisions → description → environments →
formulas → interviewLabel → label → loops → processMetadataValues → processType →
recordCreates → recordDeletes → recordLookups → recordUpdates → runInMode →
screens → start → status → subflows → textTemplates → variables → waits

Common Mistake: Adding an assignment near related logic (e.g., after a loop) when other assignments exist earlier.

• Error: "Element assignments is duplicated at this location"
• Fix: Move ALL assignments to the assignments section

Performance

• Batch DML: Get Records → Assignment → Update Records pattern
• Filters over loops: Use Get Records with filters instead of loops + decisions
• Transform element: Powerful but complex structure - NOT recommended for hand-written flows

Design & Security

• Variable Names (v2.0.0): Use prefixes for clarity:
  • var_ Regular variables (e.g., var_AccountName)
  • col_ Collections (e.g., col_ContactIds)
  • rec_ Record variables (e.g., rec_Account)
  • inp_ Input variables (e.g., inp_RecordId)
  • out_ Output variables (e.g., out_IsSuccess)
• Element Names: PascalCase_With_Underscores (e.g., Check_Account_Type)
• Button Names (v2.0.0): Action_[Verb]_[Object] (e.g., Action_Save_Contact)
• System vs User Mode: Understand implications, validate FLS for sensitive fields
• No hardcoded data: Use variables/custom settings
• See references/flow-best-practices.md for comprehensive guidance

Common Error Patterns

DML in Loop: Collect records in collection variable → Single DML after loop Missing Fault Path: Add fault connector from DML → error handling → log/display Self-Referencing Fault: Error "element cannot be connected to itself" → Route fault connector to DIFFERENT element Element Duplicated: Error "Element X is duplicated" → Group ALL elements of same type together Field Not Found: Verify field exists, deploy field first if missing Insufficient Permissions: Check profile permissions, consider System mode

Error Pattern	Fix
$Record__Prior in Create-only	Only valid for Update/CreateAndUpdate triggers
"Parent.Field doesn't exist"	Use TWO Get Records (child then parent)
$Record__c loop fails	Use $Record directly (single context, not collection)

Error → Solution Quick Reference

Error Message	Solution
Duplicate developer name: X	Screen field already created this reference — don't add a separate variable
Can't use object field with sObjectInputReference	Remove object property when using inputReference
isCollection invalid in FlowConstant	Use Decision + Variable counter instead of a constant collection
Invalid element reference X not found	Check all element names are unique and connectors point to existing elements
Flow won't open in Flow Builder	Add all empty element type arrays to flow metadata
Silent failure on metadata_update	Read current state first with metadata_read; build iteratively
Required field missing	Add processMetadataValues: [] to every element

Metadata Gotchas: See references/xml-gotchas.md

---

⚠️ Critical Lessons Learned (Metadata API Flows)

These lessons apply when creating or updating flows via metadata_create / metadata_update (JSON format). They are based on real-world failures and must be followed to avoid deployment errors.

Lesson 1: Screen Field Names ARE Element References

Screen fields automatically create element references with their field name. Do NOT create a separate variable for screen fields — this causes a Duplicate developer name error.

// WRONG: Don't create variable with same name as screen field
{ "screens": [{ "fields": [{ "name": "User_Input" }] }],
  "variables": [{ "name": "User_Input" }]  // DUPLICATE ERROR }

// CORRECT: Reference the screen field directly
{ "formulas": [{ "expression": "{!User_Input} & \" suffix\"" }] }

Lesson 2: Collection DML — Cannot Use Both object and inputReference

When creating records from a collection using inputReference, do NOT include the object field. Define objectType on the variable instead.

// WRONG:
{ "name": "Create_All", "object": "Account", "inputReference": "Var_Col" }

// CORRECT: objectType goes on the variable, not the create element
{ "variables": [{ "name": "Var_Col", "dataType": "SObject",
    "objectType": "Account", "isCollection": true }],
  "recordCreates": [{ "name": "Create_All", "inputReference": "Var_Col" }] }

Lesson 3: Constants Cannot Be Collections

Flow constants cannot be collections or SObjects. Use a Decision + Counter Variable instead.

Lesson 4: Read Current State Before Complex Updates

ALWAYS call metadata_read immediately before metadata_update for complex changes. Salesforce replaces the entire flow version on update — working with stale metadata will overwrite recent changes.

1. Call metadata_read to get current state
2. Analyze current elements and dependencies
3. Modify the retrieved metadata
4. Call metadata_update with complete state

Lesson 5: All Element Names Must Be Globally Unique

Every element name in a Flow must be unique across ALL element types. Use prefixes to enforce this:

Element Type	Naming Convention	Example
Variables	Var_*	Var_Account_Id
Formulas	Formula_*	Formula_Full_Name
Screens	Screen_*	Screen_Welcome
Decisions	Decision_*	Decision_Route
Assignments	Assign_*	Assign_Defaults
Choices	Choice_*	Choice_Option_A
Screen Fields	Descriptive	Account_Name

Lesson 6: Build Flows Iteratively, Not All At Once

• Phase 1 — Shell: metadata_create with minimal structure. Test: Does it open in Flow Builder?
• Phase 2 — Basic Navigation: Add first screen and routing. Test: Can you navigate through it?
• Phase 3 — Core Logic: Add record lookups and variables. Test: Does data flow correctly?
• Phase 4 — Advanced Features: Add formulas, loops, calculations. Test: Do calculations work?

Red flags: Creating 100+ line JSON on first attempt. Adding 5+ new element types at once. Not testing in Flow Builder between changes.

Lesson 7: Collection DML Pattern — Build, Gather, Execute

Never create records one-by-one in a loop. Build a collection, then execute a single DML operation:

1. Build_Record — Assign field values to Var_Current_Record (single SObject variable)
2. Add_To_Collection — Use operator Add to append to the collection variable
3. After loop exits — Single recordCreates with inputReference pointing to the collection

Synchronous DML limit: 150 statements. Creating 10 records individually = 10 DML. Creating 10 records via collection = 1 DML.

Lesson 8: processMetadataValues — Always Include Empty Array

Every Flow element MUST have a processMetadataValues property, even if it's an empty array. Without it, Salesforce may fail silently or discard the element.

{ "name": "Element_Name", "processMetadataValues": [] }

Lesson 8.5: Resource vs Node Elements — Property Rules

Flow elements split into two families. Resources (data containers) and Nodes (canvas/visual elements) do NOT accept the same properties. Mixing them up is one of the most common deploy-time failures (e.g. "The FlowFormula element doesn't accept a label property").

Family	Element types	Has name / description	Has label	Has locationX / locationY	Has connector
Resources (no canvas position)	formulas, variables, constants, textTemplates, choices, dynamicChoiceSets	✅	❌	❌	❌
Nodes (visual, canvas elements)	assignments, decisions, screens, loops, recordCreates, recordUpdates, recordDeletes, recordLookups, actionCalls, apexPluginCalls, subflows, waits, steps, transforms, collectionProcessors, orchestratedStages, customErrors, recordRollbacks	✅	✅	✅	✅ (most)
Hybrid resources (own label)	stages, rules, exitRules, experimentPaths, scheduledPaths, screenActions, stageSteps, waitEvents	✅	✅	❌	varies

General rule: If you find yourself adding label, locationX, or locationY to a formulas, variables, constants, textTemplates, or choices entry, stop — those properties do not exist on those types and the deploy will fail with a metadata error.

Common manifestation:

// WRONG — FlowFormula does not accept label
{ "formulas": [{ "name": "Is_Overdue", "label": "Is Overdue",
                  "dataType": "Boolean", "expression": "{!CloseDate} < TODAY()" }] }

// CORRECT — use `name` + `description` only; the formula has no canvas presence
{ "formulas": [{ "name": "Is_Overdue", "description": "True when CloseDate is in the past",
                  "dataType": "Boolean", "expression": "{!CloseDate} < TODAY()" }] }

If you need a human-readable label, put it on the node that uses the formula (e.g. a Decision with label: "Is the record overdue?"), not on the formula itself.

The local validator (validate_flow.py) detects this class of error as a CRITICAL issue — run it before every deploy.

Lesson 9: Empty Arrays for All Element Type Collections

Include ALL element type arrays in your flow metadata, even if empty. Missing arrays can cause silent failures, elements being deleted, or flows that won't save.

{
  "assignments": [],
  "choices": [],
  "decisions": [],
  "formulas": [],
  "loops": [],
  "recordCreates": [],
  "recordDeletes": [],
  "recordLookups": [],
  "recordUpdates": [],
  "screens": [],
  "variables": [],
  "textTemplates": []
}

Lesson 10: Connector Chains — Every Element Needs a Path

Every element (except the final one) must have a connector to the next element. Mental checklist for each element:

• Does it have a connector?
• If it's a decision, does it have a defaultConnector?
• Does the targetReference point to an existing element?
• Is this intentionally the final element (screen with allowFinish: true)?

Flow Shell Template (JSON for metadata_create)

Always start with this complete template — include ALL empty arrays:

{
  "fullName": "PLACEHOLDER",
  "label": "PLACEHOLDER",
  "apiVersion": 65,
  "processType": "Flow",
  "status": "Draft",
  "interviewLabel": "PLACEHOLDER {!$Flow.CurrentDateTime}",
  "environments": ["Default"],
  "processMetadataValues": [
    { "name": "BuilderType", "value": { "stringValue": "LightningFlowBuilder" } },
    { "name": "CanvasMode", "value": { "stringValue": "AUTO_LAYOUT_CANVAS" } }
  ],
  "start": {
    "locationX": 0,
    "locationY": 0,
    "connector": { "targetReference": "FIRST_ELEMENT" },
    "filters": [],
    "processMetadataValues": []
  },
  "assignments": [],
  "choices": [],
  "decisions": [],
  "formulas": [],
  "loops": [],
  "recordCreates": [],
  "recordDeletes": [],
  "recordLookups": [],
  "recordUpdates": [],
  "screens": [],
  "variables": [],
  "textTemplates": []
}

Flow Element Types Reference

Element Type	Purpose	Key Notes
Start	Entry point	Contains connector to first element; record-triggered adds filters/object
Variables	Store values	Counter vars: dataType Number, scale 0. Collections: isCollection true
Screens	User interface	Fields auto-create element references — do NOT create duplicate variables
Decisions	Branching logic	Must always include defaultConnector
Record Lookups	Query Salesforce data	Use storeOutputAutomatically: false for security
Record Creates	Insert new records	Use inputReference for collections — never combine with object field
Assignments	Set variable values	Operators: Assign, Add, AssignCount
Loops	Iterate collections	Auto-creates currentItem_{LoopName} variable
Formulas	Computed values	Use {!VarName} syntax to reference other elements

Edge Cases

Scenario	Solution
>200 records	Warn limits, suggest scheduled flow
>5 branches	Use subflows
Cross-object	Check circular deps, test recursion
Production	Deploy Draft, activate explicitly
Unknown org	Use standard objects (Account, Contact, etc.)

Debug: Flow not visible → deploy report + permissions | Tests fail → Debug Logs + bulk test | Sandbox→Prod fails → FLS + dependencies

---

Flow MCP Patterns

General rules

• Do not hard-code IDs (queues, users, record types) in flows
• Use Entry Conditions (formulas in the start block) instead of a Decision with an empty action
• Set layout to Auto-Layout (CanvasMode: AUTO_LAYOUT_CANVAS)
• Do not create a new flow to fix an issue — create a new version instead
• Do not say something "cannot be done via API" — always attempt it

List all flows (with active and latest version info)

tooling_api_query(sObject="FlowDefinition", fields=["Id","DeveloperName","NamespacePrefix","MasterLabel","Description","ActiveVersionId","ActiveVersion.VersionNumber","LatestVersionId","LatestVersion.VersionNumber","LatestVersion.Status","LatestVersion.MasterLabel","LatestVersion.Description"])

Retrieve a specific flow version

First get the version Id from the FlowDefinition query above, then:

tooling_api_query(sObject="Flow", fields=["Id","FullName","DefinitionId","Definition.DeveloperName","MasterLabel","Description","VersionNumber","Status","Metadata","ProcessType"], whereClause="Id='<flow version id>'")

Note: do not include FullName or Metadata in multi-record queries — only single-record retrieval supports these.

Create a new flow

metadata_create(type="Flow", metadata=[{"fullName": "Flow_Name", "label": "Flow Name", "apiVersion": 65, "processType": "AutoLaunchedFlow", "status": "Draft", ...}])

Update a flow (creates a new version)

1. Retrieve current metadata: metadata_read(type="Flow", fullNames=["Flow_Name"])
2. Apply changes to the metadata object
3. Deploy: metadata_update(type="Flow", metadata=[{...}], upsert=True)
   • Do NOT change the fullName — version numbers are managed automatically
   • In production: deploy as status: Draft and ask user to activate manually if you get an error

Activate / deactivate a flow version

metadata_update(type="FlowDefinition", metadata=[{"fullName": "Flow_Name", "activeVersionNumber": <version>}])

To deactivate all versions: set activeVersionNumber to 0.

Delete a flow

1. Deactivate: metadata_update(type="FlowDefinition", metadata=[{"fullName": "Flow_Name", "activeVersionNumber": 0}])
2. Delete all versions: tooling_api_dml(operation="delete", sObject="Flow", record={"Id": "<flow version id>"}) (repeat for each version)

Check flow test coverage

tooling_api_query(sObject="Flow", fields=["Definition.DeveloperName"], whereClause="Status = 'Active' AND (ProcessType = 'AutolaunchedFlow' OR ProcessType = 'Workflow' OR ProcessType = 'CustomEvent' OR ProcessType = 'InvocableProcess') AND Id NOT IN (SELECT FlowVersionId FROM FlowTestCoverage)")

Find paused or failed flow interviews

soql_query(sObject="FlowInterview", fields=["Id","Name","CurrentElement","InterviewStatus","PauseLabel","CreatedDate"], whereClause="InterviewStatus IN ('Paused', 'Failed')")

---

the Salesforce MCP server Integration Examples

Example 1: Verify Object Exists Before Creating Flow

# Before generating a flow for a custom object
sobject_describe(
    sObject="Invoice__c",
    sf_user="prod-username"
)
# Returns: Field list, object metadata, standard fields

Example 2: List Existing Flows

# Check what flows already exist
metadata_list(
    type="Flow",
    sf_user="prod-username"
)
# Returns: All Flow metadata objects in org

Example 3: Deploy a Complete Record-Triggered Flow

Pattern note: the faultConnector on Send_Email_Action routes to the Log_Error step. This is the "error-log object" pattern from the fault-destination rubric: if the email fails (e.g. domain not verified, recipient suppressed), the originating Case save is not blocked, and the failure is captured in Flow_Error__c for investigation. See the rubric for alternative fault destinations.

# Complete example: notify managers when case category changes
metadata_create(
    type="Flow",
    metadata=[{
        "fullName": "Case_Category_Change_Alert",
        "apiVersion": 65,
        "description": "Sends email when Case Category changes from Billing to Channel. Side-effect flow: email failures are caught via faultConnector so the originating Case save is never blocked.",
        "environments": ["Default"],
        "interviewLabel": "Case Category Change Alert {!$Flow.CurrentDateTime}",
        "label": "Case Category Change Alert",
        "processMetadataValues": [
            {"name": "BuilderType", "value": {"stringValue": "LightningFlowBuilder"}},
            {"name": "CanvasMode", "value": {"stringValue": "AUTO_LAYOUT_CANVAS"}}
        ],
        "processType": "AutoLaunchedFlow",
        "start": {
            "locationX": 0, "locationY": 0,
            "connector": {"targetReference": "Check_Previous_Category"},
            "filterLogic": "and",
            "filters": [
                {"field": "Case_Category__c", "operator": "EqualTo", "value": {"stringValue": "Channel"}},
                {"field": "Case_Category__c", "operator": "IsChanged", "value": {"booleanValue": True}}
            ],
            "object": "Case",
            "recordTriggerType": "Update",
            "triggerType": "RecordAfterSave"
        },
        "decisions": [{
            "name": "Check_Previous_Category",
            "label": "Check Previous Category",
            "locationX": 0, "locationY": 0,
            "defaultConnectorLabel": "Default Outcome",
            "rules": [{
                "name": "Was_Billing",
                "conditionLogic": "and",
                "conditions": [{
                    "leftValueReference": "$Record__Prior.Case_Category__c",
                    "operator": "EqualTo",
                    "rightValue": {"stringValue": "Billing"}
                }],
                "connector": {"targetReference": "Send_Email_Action"},
                "label": "Was Billing"
            }]
        }],
        "actionCalls": [{
            "name": "Send_Email_Action",
            "label": "Send Email",
            "locationX": 0, "locationY": 0,
            "actionName": "emailSimple",
            "actionType": "emailSimple",
            "flowTransactionModel": "CurrentTransaction",
            "inputParameters": [
                {"name": "emailAddresses", "value": {"stringValue": "[e-mail]"}},
                {"name": "emailSubject", "value": {"stringValue": "Case Category Changed to Channel"}},
                {"name": "emailBody", "value": {"stringValue": "Case {!$Record.CaseNumber} category changed from Billing to Channel."}}
            ],
            "faultConnector": {"targetReference": "Log_Error"}
        }],
        "recordCreates": [{
            "name": "Log_Error",
            "label": "Log Error",
            "locationX": 0, "locationY": 0,
            "object": "Flow_Error__c",
            "inputAssignments": [
                {"field": "Flow_Name__c", "value": {"stringValue": "Case_Category_Change_Alert"}},
                {"field": "Context_Record_Id__c", "value": {"elementReference": "$Record.Id"}},
                {"field": "Error_Source__c", "value": {"stringValue": "Send_Email_Action"}}
            ]
        }],
        "status": "Draft"
    }],
    sf_user="prod-username"
)

Example 4: Retrieve Existing Flow for Review

# Get the metadata of an existing flow
metadata_read(
    type="Flow",
    fullNames=["Auto_Lead_Assignment"],
    sf_user="prod-username"
)
# Returns: Complete Flow metadata from org (JSON)

Example 5: Query Flow Metadata (Tooling API)

# Find all active flows
tooling_api_query(
    sObject="FlowDefinition",
    fields=["Id", "ApiName", "Description", "Status"],
    whereClause="Status = 'Active'",
    sf_user="prod-username"
)

---

Cross-Skill Integration

From Skill	To sf-flow	When
sf-apex	→ sf-flow	"Create Flow wrapper for Apex logic"
sf-integration	→ sf-flow	"Create HTTP Callout Flow"

From sf-flow	To Skill	When
sf-flow	→ sf-metadata	"Describe Invoice__c" (verify fields before flow)
sf-flow	→ sf-data	"Create 200 test Accounts" (after deploy)

Deployment: See Phase 4 above.

---

LWC Integration (Screen Flows)

Embed custom Lightning Web Components in Flow Screens for rich, interactive UIs.

Templates

Template	Purpose
assets/screen-flow-with-lwc.xml	Flow embedding LWC component
assets/apex-action-template.xml	Flow calling Apex @InvocableMethod

Flow Pattern (XML reference — deploy as JSON)

The XML below shows the structural pattern. When deploying via metadata_create, translate to the equivalent JSON object.

<screens>
    <fields>
        <extensionName>c:recordSelector</extensionName>
        <fieldType>ComponentInstance</fieldType>
        <inputParameters>
            <name>recordId</name>
            <value><elementReference>var_RecordId</elementReference></value>
        </inputParameters>
        <outputParameters>
            <assignToReference>var_SelectedId</assignToReference>
            <name>selectedRecordId</name>
        </outputParameters>
    </fields>
</screens>

Documentation

Resource	Location
LWC Integration Guide	references/lwc-integration-guide.md
LWC Component Setup	sf-lwc/assets/flow-integration-guide.md
Triangle Architecture	references/triangle-pattern.md

---

Apex Integration

Call Apex @InvocableMethod classes from Flow for complex business logic.

Flow Pattern (XML reference — deploy as JSON)