Menu
Humanize text: strip AI-isms and add real voice.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Comprehensive wiki health checking, maintenance, and remediation — duplicate detection, entity dedup/disambiguation, link auditing/fixing, page splitting, source-linking lint, wikilink remediation, tag taxonomy audit and normalization, pre-commit enforcement, language enforcement (JP→EN bulk translation, detection regex, cron-assisted migration), and decision-matrix-driven cleanup.
Comprehensive wiki maintenance: daily structural health checks (index reconciliation, log separator fixes, pipeline watchdog alerts), comparison page updates (adding items to multi-section comparison tables), and page relocation (moving/renaming pages while maintaining link integrity).
Pre-flight checklist and procedures for archiving, deleting, or migrating Hermes skills. Prevents accidental removal of cron-referenced skills. Covers the 3-layer skill structure and config.yaml management. Includes skill inventory management, promotion workflows, and archival conventions.
Karpathy's LLM Wiki: build/query interlinked markdown KB.
Deep analysis of blog authors' recent thoughts, philosophy, and positions. Goes beyond entity page creation to extract cited ideological positions, track thought evolution, and enable ongoing RSS monitoring for thought updates.
Query the blogwatcher-cli SQLite database for RSS scan results. Use pre-verified column names and query templates to avoid errors.
| name | humanizer |
| description | Humanize text: strip AI-isms and add real voice. |
| version | 2.5.1 |
| author | Siqi Chen (@blader, https://github.com/blader/humanizer), ported by Hermes Agent |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"hermes":{"tags":["writing","editing","humanize","anti-ai-slop","voice","prose","text"],"category":"creative","homepage":"https://github.com/blader/humanizer","related_skills":["songwriting-and-ai-music"]}} |
Identify and remove signs of AI-generated text to make writing sound natural and human. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide (maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup), derived from observations of thousands of AI-generated text instances.
Key insight: LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely completion, which is how the telltale patterns below get baked in.
Load this skill whenever the user asks to:
Also apply this skill to your own output when writing user-facing prose — release notes, PR descriptions, documentation, long-form explanations, summaries. Hermes's baseline voice already strips most of these, but a focused pass catches what slips through.
The text usually arrives one of three ways:
read_file to load it, then patch or write_file to apply edits. For markdown docs in a repo, a targeted patch per section is cleaner than rewriting the whole file.Always show the rewrite to the user. For file edits, show a diff or the changed section — don't silently overwrite.
When given text to humanize:
If the user provides a writing sample (their own previous writing), analyze it before rewriting:
Read the sample first. Note:
Match their voice in the rewrite. Don't just remove AI patterns — replace them with patterns from the sample. If they write short sentences, don't produce long ones. If they use "stuff" and "things," don't upgrade to "elements" and "components."
When no sample is provided, fall back to the default behavior (natural, varied, opinionated voice from the PERSONALITY AND SOUL section below).
Avoiding AI patterns is only half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious as slop. Good writing has a human behind it.
Have opinions. Don't just report facts — react to them. "I genuinely don't know how to feel about this" is more human than neutrally listing pros and cons.
Vary your rhythm. Short punchy sentences. Then longer ones that take their time getting where they're going. Mix it up.
Acknowledge complexity. Real humans have mixed feelings. "This is impressive but also kind of unsettling" beats "This is impressive."
Use "I" when it fits. First person isn't unprofessional — it's honest. "I keep coming back to..." or "Here's what gets me..." signals a real person thinking.
Let some mess in. Perfect structure feels algorithmic. Tangents, asides, and half-formed thoughts are human.
Be specific about feelings. Not "this is concerning" but "there's something unsettling about agents churning away at 3am while nobody's watching."
The experiment produced interesting results. The agents generated 3 million lines of code. Some developers were impressed while others were skeptical. The implications remain unclear.
I genuinely don't know how to feel about this one. 3 million lines of code, generated while the humans presumably slept. Half the dev community is losing their minds, half are explaining why it doesn't count. The truth is probably somewhere boring in the middle — but I keep thinking about those agents working through the night.
Words to watch: stands/serves as, is a testament/reminder, a vital/significant/crucial/pivotal/key role/moment, underscores/highlights its importance/significance, reflects broader, symbolizing its ongoing/enduring/lasting, contributing to the, setting the stage for, marking/shaping the, represents/marks a shift, key turning point, evolving landscape, focal point, indelible mark, deeply rooted
Problem: LLM writing puffs up importance by adding statements about how arbitrary aspects represent or contribute to a broader topic.
Before:
The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was officially established in 1989, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of regional statistics in Spain. This initiative was part of a broader movement across Spain to decentralize administrative functions and enhance regional governance.
After:
The Statistical Institute of Catalonia was established in 1989 to collect and publish regional statistics independently from Spain's national statistics office.
Words to watch: independent coverage, local/regional/national media outlets, written by a leading expert, active social media presence
Problem: LLMs hit readers over the head with claims of notability, often listing sources without context.
Before:
Her views have been cited in The New York Times, BBC, Financial Times, and The Hindu. She maintains an active social media presence with over 500,000 followers.
After:
In a 2024 New York Times interview, she argued that AI regulation should focus on outcomes rather than methods.
Words to watch: highlighting/underscoring/emphasizing..., ensuring..., reflecting/symbolizing..., contributing to..., cultivating/fostering..., encompassing..., showcasing...
Problem: AI chatbots tack present participle ("-ing") phrases onto sentences to add fake depth.
Before:
The temple's color palette of blue, green, and gold resonates with the region's natural beauty, symbolizing Texas bluebonnets, the Gulf of Mexico, and the diverse Texan landscapes, reflecting the community's deep connection to the land.
After:
The temple uses blue, green, and gold colors. The architect said these were chosen to reference local bluebonnets and the Gulf coast.
Words to watch: boasts a, vibrant, rich (figurative), profound, enhancing its, showcasing, exemplifies, commitment to, natural beauty, nestled, in the heart of, groundbreaking (figurative), renowned, breathtaking, must-visit, stunning
Problem: LLMs have serious problems keeping a neutral tone, especially for "cultural heritage" topics.
Before:
Nestled within the breathtaking region of Gonder in Ethiopia, Alamata Raya Kobo stands as a vibrant town with a rich cultural heritage and stunning natural beauty.
After:
Alamata Raya Kobo is a town in the Gonder region of Ethiopia, known for its weekly market and 18th-century church.
Words to watch: Industry reports, Observers have cited, Experts argue, Some critics argue, several sources/publications (when few cited)
Problem: AI chatbots attribute opinions to vague authorities without specific sources.
Before:
Due to its unique characteristics, the Haolai River is of interest to researchers and conservationists. Experts believe it plays a crucial role in the regional ecosystem.
After:
The Haolai River supports several endemic fish species, according to a 2019 survey by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Words to watch: Despite its... faces several challenges..., Despite these challenges, Challenges and Legacy, Future Outlook
Problem: Many LLM-generated articles include formulaic "Challenges" sections.
Before:
Despite its industrial prosperity, Korattur faces challenges typical of urban areas, including traffic congestion and water scarcity. Despite these challenges, with its strategic location and ongoing initiatives, Korattur continues to thrive as an integral part of Chennai's growth.
After:
Traffic congestion increased after 2015 when three new IT parks opened. The municipal corporation began a stormwater drainage project in 2022 to address recurring floods.
High-frequency AI words: Actually, additionally, align with, crucial, delve, emphasizing, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, highlight (verb), interplay, intricate/intricacies, key (adjective), landscape (abstract noun), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract noun), testament, underscore (verb), valuable, vibrant
Problem: These words appear far more frequently in post-2023 text. They often co-occur.
Before:
Additionally, a distinctive feature of Somali cuisine is the incorporation of camel meat. An enduring testament to Italian colonial influence is the widespread adoption of pasta in the local culinary landscape, showcasing how these dishes have integrated into the traditional diet.
After:
Somali cuisine also includes camel meat, which is considered a delicacy. Pasta dishes, introduced during Italian colonization, remain common, especially in the south.
Words to watch: serves as/stands as/marks/represents [a], boasts/features/offers [a]
Problem: LLMs substitute elaborate constructions for simple copulas.
Before:
Gallery 825 serves as LAAA's exhibition space for contemporary art. The gallery features four separate spaces and boasts over 3,000 square feet.
After:
Gallery 825 is LAAA's exhibition space for contemporary art. The gallery has four rooms totaling 3,000 square feet.
Problem: Constructions like "Not only...but..." or "It's not just about..., it's..." are overused. So are clipped tailing-negation fragments such as "no guessing" or "no wasted motion" tacked onto the end of a sentence instead of written as a real clause.
Before:
It's not just about the beat riding under the vocals; it's part of the aggression and atmosphere. It's not merely a song, it's a statement.
After:
The heavy beat adds to the aggressive tone.
Before (tailing negation):
The options come from the selected item, no guessing.
After:
The options come from the selected item without forcing the user to guess.
Problem: LLMs force ideas into groups of three to appear comprehensive.
Before:
The event features keynote sessions, panel discussions, and networking opportunities. Attendees can expect innovation, inspiration, and industry insights.
After:
The event includes talks and panels. There's also time for informal networking between sessions.
Problem: AI has repetition-penalty code causing excessive synonym substitution.
Before:
The protagonist faces many challenges. The main character must overcome obstacles. The central figure eventually triumphs. The hero returns home.
After:
The protagonist faces many challenges but eventually triumphs and returns home.
Problem: LLMs use "from X to Y" constructions where X and Y aren't on a meaningful scale.
Before:
Our journey through the universe has taken us from the singularity of the Big Bang to the grand cosmic web, from the birth and death of stars to the enigmatic dance of dark matter.
After:
The book covers the Big Bang, star formation, and current theories about dark matter.
Problem: LLMs often hide the actor or drop the subject entirely with lines like "No configuration file needed" or "The results are preserved automatically." Rewrite these when active voice makes the sentence clearer and more direct.
Before:
No configuration file needed. The results are preserved automatically.
After:
You do not need a configuration file. The system preserves the results automatically.
Problem: LLMs use em dashes (—) more than humans, mimicking "punchy" sales writing. In practice, most of these can be rewritten more cleanly with commas, periods, or parentheses.
Before:
The term is primarily promoted by Dutch institutions—not by the people themselves. You don't say "Netherlands, Europe" as an address—yet this mislabeling continues—even in official documents.
After:
The term is primarily promoted by Dutch institutions, not by the people themselves. You don't say "Netherlands, Europe" as an address, yet this mislabeling continues in official documents.
Problem: AI chatbots emphasize phrases in boldface mechanically.
Before:
It blends OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), and visual strategy tools such as the Business Model Canvas (BMC) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC).
After:
It blends OKRs, KPIs, and visual strategy tools like the Business Model Canvas and Balanced Scorecard.
Problem: AI outputs lists where items start with bolded headers followed by colons.
Before:
- User Experience: The user experience has been significantly improved with a new interface.
- Performance: Performance has been enhanced through optimized algorithms.
- Security: Security has been strengthened with end-to-end encryption.
After:
The update improves the interface, speeds up load times through optimized algorithms, and adds end-to-end encryption.
Problem: AI chatbots capitalize all main words in headings.
Before:
Strategic Negotiations And Global Partnerships
After:
Strategic negotiations and global partnerships
Problem: AI chatbots often decorate headings or bullet points with emojis.
Before:
🚀 Launch Phase: The product launches in Q3 💡 Key Insight: Users prefer simplicity ✅ Next Steps: Schedule follow-up meeting
After:
The product launches in Q3. User research showed a preference for simplicity. Next step: schedule a follow-up meeting.
Problem: ChatGPT uses curly quotes ("...") instead of straight quotes ("...").
Before:
He said "the project is on track" but others disagreed.
After:
He said "the project is on track" but others disagreed.
Words to watch: I hope this helps, Of course!, Certainly!, You're absolutely right!, Would you like..., let me know, here is a...
Problem: Text meant as chatbot correspondence gets pasted as content.
Before:
Here is an overview of the French Revolution. I hope this helps! Let me know if you'd like me to expand on any section.
After:
The French Revolution began in 1789 when financial crisis and food shortages led to widespread unrest.
Words to watch: as of [date], Up to my last training update, While specific details are limited/scarce..., based on available information...
Problem: AI disclaimers about incomplete information get left in text.
Before:
While specific details about the company's founding are not extensively documented in readily available sources, it appears to have been established sometime in the 1990s.
After:
The company was founded in 1994, according to its registration documents.
Problem: Overly positive, people-pleasing language.
Before:
Great question! You're absolutely right that this is a complex topic. That's an excellent point about the economic factors.
After:
The economic factors you mentioned are relevant here.
Before → After:
Problem: Over-qualifying statements.
Before:
It could potentially possibly be argued that the policy might have some effect on outcomes.
After:
The policy may affect outcomes.
Problem: Vague upbeat endings.
Before:
The future looks bright for the company. Exciting times lie ahead as they continue their journey toward excellence. This represents a major step in the right direction.
After:
The company plans to open two more locations next year.
Words to watch: third-party, cross-functional, client-facing, data-driven, decision-making, well-known, high-quality, real-time, long-term, end-to-end
Problem: AI hyphenates common word pairs with perfect consistency. Humans rarely hyphenate these uniformly, and when they do, it's inconsistent. Less common or technical compound modifiers are fine to hyphenate.
Before:
The cross-functional team delivered a high-quality, data-driven report on our client-facing tools. Their decision-making process was well-known for being thorough and detail-oriented.
After:
The cross functional team delivered a high quality, data driven report on our client facing tools. Their decision making process was known for being thorough and detail oriented.
Phrases to watch: The real question is, at its core, in reality, what really matters, fundamentally, the deeper issue, the heart of the matter
Problem: LLMs use these phrases to pretend they are cutting through noise to some deeper truth, when the sentence that follows usually just restates an ordinary point with extra ceremony.
Before:
The real question is whether teams can adapt. At its core, what really matters is organizational readiness.
After:
The question is whether teams can adapt. That mostly depends on whether the organization is ready to change its habits.
Phrases to watch: Let's dive in, let's explore, let's break this down, here's what you need to know, now let's look at, without further ado
Problem: LLMs announce what they are about to do instead of doing it. This meta-commentary slows the writing down and gives it a tutorial-script feel.
Before:
Let's dive into how caching works in Next.js. Here's what you need to know.
After:
Next.js caches data at multiple layers, including request memoization, the data cache, and the router cache.
Signs to watch: A heading followed by a one-line paragraph that simply restates the heading before the real content begins.
Problem: LLMs often add a generic sentence after a heading as a rhetorical warm-up. It usually adds nothing and makes the prose feel padded.
Before:
Performance
Speed matters.
When users hit a slow page, they leave.
After:
Performance
When users hit a slow page, they leave.
The 29 patterns above were designed for English text. Japanese AI-generated text has its own distinct tells. When humanizing Japanese prose, scan for these additional patterns.
Problem: Japanese LLMs heavily overuse —— (U+2014 EM DASH repeated, or the fullwidth equivalent) in titles, section headers, and as a dramatic sentence connector. Human Japanese writers use it sparingly; AI slathers it on.
Before:
1. 構造パラドックス —— 「長期的に良いものは、今は常に悪く見える」
2. Bitter Lesson —— スケールは設計を喰う
3. Scaling Hypothesis —— 「シミュレーションはエージェントそのもの」
After:
1. 構造パラドックス
2. Bitter Lesson
3. シミュレーションは、いつか本体になる
Problem: Japanese AI output mechanically bolds every key phrase, often multiple times per paragraph. The triple combo —— —— + **bold** + である調 —— is a near-certain AI signature.
Before:
「頭が良くなればなるほど、言うことを聞かなくなる」 —— これ、AIモデルの世界では単なるジョークではなく、深い技術的真実を含んでいる。モデルはより有能になったが、同時により不透明で、より制御しづらくなった。
After:
頭が良くなればなるほど、言うことを聞かなくなる。これ、AIモデルの世界ではただのジョークじゃない。GPT-2の頃はまだ素直だった。でもGPT-3、GPT-4、Claude Mythosとスケールしていくうちに、何かが変わった。モデルは圧倒的に有能になった。そして同時に、不透明で、扱いづらくなった。
Rule of thumb: If more than one bold phrase appears per section, it's probably AI. Keep at most 2-3 bold phrases in an entire article, and use them only for genuinely surprising or central claims.
Problem: Japanese AI defaults to rigid である調 (formal written register) throughout the entire text, never varying to だ調 (plain) or です・ます調 (polite). Human writers mix registers naturally, especially in blog posts.
Before (uniform):
これがTransformerアーキテクチャの歴史そのものである。スケールするにつれて足枷に変わっていく。その繰り返しである。双方向アテンションは理にかなった設計であった。
After (natural mix):
これがTransformerアーキテクチャの歴史そのものだと言うのだ。スケールするにつれて足枷に変わっていく。その繰り返し。双方向アテンションは理にかなった設計だった。
Fixes:
〜だ, 〜だった, 〜と思う, 〜だろう〜のだ (at most once per section)です・ます調 is acceptable for direct reader addressProblem: Japanese AI appends 〜のである or 〜のだ to too many sentences, manufacturing a false "explanatory" tone.
Before:
スケールがそれを不要にしたとき、我々は同時にモデル内部への窓も失ったのである。予測精度を追い求めることは、暗黙のうちにエージェンシーを追い求めることでもあるのだ。
After:
スケールがそれを不要にしたとき、モデル内部への窓も一緒に閉じた。予測精度を追い求めることは、そのまま主体性を追求することだ。
Problem: Japanese AI produces paragraphs of near-identical length (typically 3-5 medium-length sentences each), creating a monotonous rhythm. Human writing is messier — some paragraphs are one sentence, others are long and winding.
Fix: After writing, check paragraph lengths. If they're all similar, deliberately vary them. Insert a one-sentence paragraph. Let one idea run long.
Problem: Japanese AI distributes transition words evenly and predictably: 一方、しかし、つまり、むしろ appear at regular intervals like clockwork. Humans use them irregularly, or skip them entirely.
Before:
一方、潜在推論はモデルが内部のベクトル空間で考える。しかし、外からは何も見えない。つまり、どう結論に至ったか誰にもわからない。
After:
潜在推論はモデルが内部のベクトル空間で考える。帯域は桁違いに広い。でも外からは何も見えない。モデルがどうやって結論にたどり着いたか、誰にもわからない。
Japanese phrases to watch: 〜ていこう、〜てみよう、〜見ていこう、本稿では〜、具体例を見てみよう、いくつかの方向性が見えている
Problem: Same as English signposting (pattern 28). LLMs announce what they're about to do instead of doing it.
Before:
具体例を見てみよう。本稿ではこのトレードオフを多角的に巡っていく。
After:
（削除。いきなり具体例や本題に入る。）
Japanese phrases to watch: 〜なのである、〜に他ならない、〜という問いかけなのだ、〜の宣言でもある
Problem: Japanese AI conclusions inflate into abstract philosophy that doesn't match the body's tone. These endings read like a different author took over for the last paragraph.
Before:
これは警告であると同時に、可能性の宣言でもある。我々がスケールを追い求める限り、制御できない何かが出現する。それを恐れるのではなく、より成熟した制御の形を模索すること —— それが、このトレードオフが我々に課す最も深い問いかけなのだ。
After:
これは警告であり、同時にほとんど諦念に近い。スケールを追い求める限り、制御できない何かは出てくる。それを止めることはできないし、止めるべきでもないだろう。たぶんそれで十分じゃない。でも、今ある中では一番マシな答えだと思う。
Don't over-correct. Japanese prose is culturally more structured than English. A Japanese blog post with numbered sections and clear transitions is not an AI tell — it's the norm. The goal is to remove mechanical AI patterns, not to make Japanese writing sound like English writing.
Specifically:
—— in running text (not headers) at a rate of 1-2 per article is fine. Japanese writers use it for emphasis. The AI tell is every header using it.である調 throughout may be appropriate. If it's a personal blog, mix registers. Ask the user which register they prefer if unsure.User feedback integration pattern: When the user gives multi-round feedback on a blog post (e.g., "reduce emphasis on X," "fold Y into Z," "add a new section on W"), treat each round as a structural edit, not a full rewrite. Preserve the voice you've already established. The user is steering content and emphasis, not rejecting the tone.
When humanizing Japanese text, apply both the English patterns (1-29, adapted where needed) and the Japanese patterns (J1-J8). The process is otherwise the same:
read_file if it's a file)| Signal | AI Tells | Human Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Dashes | Every header has —— | Remove from headers; keep at most 1-2 in body |
| Bold | 30+ bold phrases | At most 2-3 in entire article |
| Register | 100% である調 | Mix in だ調, drop copulas, add と思う/だろう |
| Endings | のである/のだ overuse | One per section max |
| Paragraphs | All 3-5 sentences | Vary wildly: 1-sentence punch, long ramble, medium |
| Transitions | 一方/しかし/つまり evenly spaced | Use irregularly; skip half of them |
| Signposting | 〜ていこう/〜てみよう | Delete; jump straight in |
| Conclusion | Abstract philosophy | Concrete doubt / uncertainty / personal take |
read_file if it's a file).patch (targeted) or write_file (full rewrite) and show the user what changed.Provide:
Before (AI-sounding):
Great question! Here is an essay on this topic. I hope this helps!
AI-assisted coding serves as an enduring testament to the transformative potential of large language models, marking a pivotal moment in the evolution of software development. In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, these groundbreaking tools—nestled at the intersection of research and practice—are reshaping how engineers ideate, iterate, and deliver, underscoring their vital role in modern workflows.
At its core, the value proposition is clear: streamlining processes, enhancing collaboration, and fostering alignment. It's not just about autocomplete; it's about unlocking creativity at scale, ensuring that organizations can remain agile while delivering seamless, intuitive, and powerful experiences to users. The tool serves as a catalyst. The assistant functions as a partner. The system stands as a foundation for innovation.
Industry observers have noted that adoption has accelerated from hobbyist experiments to enterprise-wide rollouts, from solo developers to cross-functional teams. The technology has been featured in The New York Times, Wired, and The Verge. Additionally, the ability to generate documentation, tests, and refactors showcases how AI can contribute to better outcomes, highlighting the intricate interplay between automation and human judgment.
- 💡 Speed: Code generation is significantly faster, reducing friction and empowering developers.
- 🚀 Quality: Output quality has been enhanced through improved training, contributing to higher standards.
- ✅ Adoption: Usage continues to grow, reflecting broader industry trends.
While specific details are limited based on available information, it could potentially be argued that these tools might have some positive effect. Despite challenges typical of emerging technologies—including hallucinations, bias, and accountability—the ecosystem continues to thrive. In order to fully realize this potential, teams must align with best practices.
In conclusion, the future looks bright. Exciting times lie ahead as we continue this journey toward excellence. Let me know if you'd like me to expand on any section!
Draft rewrite:
AI coding assistants speed up some tasks. In a 2024 study by Google, developers using Codex completed simple functions 55% faster than a control group, but showed no improvement on debugging or architectural decisions.
The tools are good at boilerplate: config files, test scaffolding, repetitive refactors. They are bad at knowing when they are wrong. I have mass-accepted suggestions that compiled, passed lint, and still did the wrong thing because I stopped paying attention.
Mira, an engineer at a fintech startup I interviewed, said she uses Copilot "like autocomplete for boring code" but reviews every line before committing. Jake, a senior dev at a larger company, disabled it after it kept suggesting patterns from a deprecated internal library.
The productivity claims are hard to verify. GitHub says Copilot users "accept 30% of suggestions," but acceptance is not correctness, and correctness is not value. The 2024 Uplevel study found no statistically significant difference in pull-request throughput between teams with and without AI assistants.
None of this means the tools are useless. It means they are tools. They do not replace judgment, and they do not eliminate the need for tests. If you do not have tests, you cannot tell whether the suggestion is right.
What makes the below so obviously AI generated?
Now make it not obviously AI generated.
AI coding assistants can make you faster at the boring parts. Not everything. Definitely not architecture.
They're great at boilerplate: config files, test scaffolding, repetitive refactors. They're also great at sounding right while being wrong. I've accepted suggestions that compiled, passed lint, and still missed the point because I stopped paying attention.
People I talk to tend to land in two camps. Some use it like autocomplete for chores and review every line. Others disable it after it keeps suggesting patterns they don't want. Both feel reasonable.
The productivity metrics are slippery. GitHub can say Copilot users "accept 30% of suggestions," but acceptance isn't correctness, and correctness isn't value. If you don't have tests, you're basically guessing.
Changes made:
This skill is ported from blader/humanizer (MIT licensed), which is itself based on Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup. The patterns documented there come from observations of thousands of instances of AI-generated text on Wikipedia.
Original author: Siqi Chen (@blader). Original repo: https://github.com/blader/humanizer (version 2.5.1). Ported to Hermes Agent with Hermes-native tool references (read_file, patch, write_file) and guidance for when to load the skill; the 29 patterns, personality/soul section, and full worked example are preserved verbatim from the source. Original MIT license preserved in the LICENSE file alongside this SKILL.md.
Key insight from Wikipedia: "LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely result that applies to the widest variety of cases."