| name | auto-paper-response |
| description | Internal Harness instruction source for auto-paper-response. Route through visible Harness aliases or hook contracts instead of invoking directly. |
Auto Paper Response
Purpose
Handle reviewer comments and response letters without changing the paper's
claim boundary. This branch is optional and should not be entered by the main
auto-paper loop unless the operator asks for rebuttal or revision-response
work.
Required Inputs
- reviewer comments or decision letter
- current
claim_register.md
- current
citation_support_bank.md
- current patch or revision plan when available
- operator-approved commitments or non-negotiable boundaries
Outputs
Write under auto_paper_output/<paper_id>/:
reviewer_comment_map.md
response_strategy.md
revision_commitment_register.md
response_letter.md
Rules
- Do not promise experiments, analyses, citations, releases, or revisions that
are not done or explicitly approved.
- Do not introduce new claims to satisfy reviewers; route new claim pressure to
argument and citation first.
- Keep response commitments traceable to artifacts, patch ledger rows, or
operator gates.
- If a reviewer asks for unsupported scope expansion, return
USER_GATE or
route to the owning phase instead of writing around the issue.