| name | wf-review |
| description | Use for /wf-review in Claude Code, $wf-review or /skills wf-review in Codex, peer review, second opinion, or cross-model review. |
WF Review Adapter
Use the other available agent CLI for independent review. Never simulate a
cross-model review with the same model.
Invocation
- Claude Code: use
/wf-review [focus] or select the wf-review skill.
- Codex CLI or IDE: use
$wf-review or /skills then choose wf-review.
CLI Direction
| Runtime | Command |
|---|
| Claude Code -> Codex | `git diff |
| Codex -> Claude Code | `git diff |
| Only one CLI | Warn user. Do not self-review. |
Review Dimensions
Cover correctness, security, architecture, performance, and tests. Classify
findings as Critical, High, Medium, or Low. Return raw peer output first, then
your severity-classified synthesis.
Context
Include the relevant diff, Harness/architecture.md when architecture is in
scope, and any task acceptance criteria. If the diff is too large, ask for a
narrower scope before invoking the other CLI.