| name | researchstack-paper-write |
| description | Paper-writing skill for CS, networking, and AI venues. Use when Codex needs to draft or revise titles, abstracts,
introductions, method sections, evaluation sections, related work, limitations, or conclusions while keeping claims
aligned with evidence and tuned to conference expectations.
|
Paper Write
Read ../researchstack/references/memory.md, ../researchstack/references/conference-story-patterns.md, and ../researchstack/references/expert-advice.md before drafting for an ongoing project.
Use remembered context when available:
- claim posture the user prefers,
- venue-specific objections seen in prior reviews,
- project phrases or claims that previously overreached,
- recurring writing weaknesses worth correcting.
Write around contribution and evidence, not around the order the work happened.
Before drafting, classify the paper type from conference-story-patterns.md. For systems papers, apply Irene Zhang's Y/Z check from expert-advice.md: state which solution X is better for which application Y in which environment Z.
For every section, maintain this contract:
- claim,
- mechanism or argument,
- evidence,
- limitation.
Use venue-aware emphasis:
- ICLR: motivation, method novelty, baseline fairness, and broader limits.
- ASPLOS/SC/EuroSys/OSDI/NSDI/SIGCOMM: system model, design rationale, implementation realism, and evaluation discipline.
Prefer concrete prose:
- replace "significantly improves" with metrics and context,
- replace "state-of-the-art" unless carefully substantiated,
- replace vague novelty claims with explicit delta over prior work.
When drafting, supply:
- section objective,
- paragraph plan,
- reviewer questions the section should answer,
- phrases that should be avoided because they overclaim.
If the session reveals a repeated writing risk or a stable preference about tone, framing, or claim strength, propose an update to researcher preferences or project memory.
