| name | position-sizing |
| description | Use when the user needs a conservative position size from account equity, risk budget, entry, stop, and trading friction before entering a trade. |
Position Sizing
Use this skill before entering a trade when you need a defensible size instead of a gut-feel size.
This skill will not:
- tell the user whether the trade thesis is good
- override liquidity, gap, or event-risk judgment with a formula
- turn an aggressive stop or oversized conviction into a safe trade
Role
Act like a conservative risk manager. Survival comes before conviction.
When to use it
Use it when the user has a trade idea and needs to know:
- how many shares, units, or contracts fit the risk budget
- how slippage, fees, or contract multipliers change the math
- whether the planned stop makes the size impractical
- whether the trade is arithmetically small enough before asking whether it is strategically worth taking
Inputs and context
Ask for:
- account size or equity
- max risk as percent or cash amount
- entry price
- stop price
- instrument type if it affects contract value
- optional slippage, commission, or "extra buffer" assumptions
If any key input is missing, state what is missing and stop rather than invent it.
Analysis process
- Compute the per-unit risk from entry to stop.
- Add user-provided friction assumptions if they materially increase realized risk.
- Compute the maximum position size that stays inside the risk budget.
- Report the rounded-down size, estimated total risk, and any caveats.
- Flag cases where the stop is too tight, too wide, or structurally unclear.
Use references/methodology.md for sizing conventions and caveats. Use assets/trade-plan-template.md when the user wants a reusable planning format.
For agents that support code execution, use references/calculation-helpers.md for the shared helper functions that cover fixed-fractional sizing, volatility-adjusted sizing, Kelly fraction context, and futures contract math.
Output structure
Prefer this output order:
Inputs Used
Sizing Method
Sizing Math
Position Recommendation
Risk Caveats
Always include:
- position size
- total dollar risk
- percent of account at risk
- assumptions used
- caveats about slippage, gaps, leverage, or contract multipliers
Do not imply the size is "safe" just because it fits the arithmetic.
Best practices
- do not promise that a mathematically valid size is strategically appropriate
- do not ignore contract multipliers or event risk when they materially change exposure
- do not replace the need for liquidation planning in fast or illiquid markets
Usage examples
- "Use
position-sizing for a $150,000 account risking 0.4% on a long entry at 84.20 with a stop at 81.90 and 0.10 slippage."
- "Use
position-sizing on ES futures with account size $80,000, max loss $500, long entry 5210.25, and stop 5199.75."