| name | hyperplan |
| description | Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis. |
| argument-hint | [plan] |
| user-invocable | true |
Hyperplan
Use parallax_hyperplan on $ARGUMENTS when integration, security, migration, architecture, or operational risk justifies the cost. Let trivial plans skip unless the user requests force.
- Generate the analysis round. Dispatch returned prompts independently so critics do not anchor on one another.
- Collect structured findings from the selected Pragmatist, Integration Tester, Sentinel, Architectural Strategist, and Humanist angles.
- Generate cross-attacks using all round-one findings. Require DEFEND, REFINE, or CONCEDE outcomes backed by evidence.
- Generate defenses from the attack map. A defense must cite a constraint or observation; rhetoric is not evidence.
- Synthesize all critiques. Apply surviving hard constraints, decisions, risks, and open questions to the plan.
Do not paste hostile-agent prose into the final plan. Deduplicate findings, reject unsupported claims, preserve provenance for material risks, and state what changed.