Menu
Standards for Technical Specifications (TASK) and Use Cases.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Use when decomposing tasks into parallel sub-tasks or spawning sub-agents. Vendor-agnostic core; load a per-vendor reference for concrete tool names, directory conventions, and invocation syntax.
Use when performing Verification-Driven Development with adversarial approach. Actively challenge assumptions and find weak spots.
Use when performing VDD adversarial review with an opt-in sarcastic, provocative delivery style — a stylistic skin over vdd-adversarial mechanics (exhaustive reporting + objective bar).
Performance critic in adversarial style (optional sarcastic skin). Part of VDD Multi-Adversarial pipeline.
Use when performing OWASP security critique in adversarial style (optional sarcastic skin). Part of VDD Multi-Adversarial pipeline.
Use when performing security vulnerability assessment (OWASP, secrets, dependencies, IaC, LLM, API, MCP/agentic) or when "thinking like a hacker" to find exploits.
| name | skill-task-model |
| description | Standards for Technical Specifications (TASK) and Use Cases. |
| tier | 1 |
| version | 1.1 |
Purpose: Defines the structure and quality standards for Technical Specifications to ensure unambiguous implementation.
STOP if you are thinking:
[!TIP] See
examples/good_use_case.mdfor a complete, structured example.
[!TIP] See
examples/bad_use_case.mdfor what NOT to do.
| Agent Excuse | Reality / Counter-Argument |
|---|---|
| "Writing scenarios takes too long" | Rewriting code because of missed edge cases takes 3x longer. |
| "It's obvious what happens" | Obvious to you now. Not obvious to the Code Reviewer or you in 2 weeks. |
examples/: Reference use cases.