blog-drafter

name

blog-drafter

description

Orchestrate the full blog workflow for Signal to System: from post conception through design, drafting, editorial review/revision, and publication prep. Use when starting a new post from a topic, continuing from a spec, reviewing/revising an existing draft, or preparing content for publication. Coordinates drafting, voice calibration, review feedback, series continuity, and publication preparation. Handles all content phases (design → draft → review → publish) and editorial modes (review, revise, story-craft).

blog-drafter

Orchestrates the complete blog workflow for Signal to System, spanning post design through publication. Manages topic ideation, spec creation, research integration, MDX drafting with complete frontmatter, editorial review and revision, series continuity, and publication preparation. Works with /voice-writer (voice calibration), /humanizer (naturalness polish), /notebooklm (research grounding), /gemini-cli (web search), and /nano-banana (diagrams/images).

When to Use

• Starting a new post from a topic or idea — Phase 3 (Post Design)
• Continuing from an existing post spec — Phase 4 (Drafting)
• Reviewing/editing an existing draft — Phase 5 (Review & Revision)
• Reviewing for editorial quality — Phase 5, mode: review or revise
• Series narrative evaluation — Phase 5, mode: story
• Preparing a draft for publication — Phase 6 (Publication Prep)

Entry Points and Workflow Phases

The skill adapts to the input provided. Each entry point corresponds to a phase in the content lifecycle:

Phase 3: Post Design (Topic → Spec)

Triggered by: Topic, idea, or raw concept

Actions:

• Clarify the post angle, structure, and scope
  • Problem or misconception being addressed?
  • Primary audience (practitioner, technical leader, both)?
  • Content type (essay: long-form, structured; field-note: shorter, opinionated)?
  • Series context (belongs to a series in PKM Blogs/ directory)?
• Create a post spec using the template at docs/templates/post-planning.md
  • Working title, excerpt, thesis, section outline (3-6 sections)
  • Key claims with sources (research, experience, analysis)
  • Related posts in Signal to System
  • Series information
• Save spec to PKM: MeatyBrain/Blogs/<Series>/<Post>/[post-slug]-spec.md
• Proceed to Phase 4

Phase 4: Drafting (Spec → MDX Draft)

Triggered by: Post spec file

Actions:

• Read calibration materials (mandatory):
  • Voice spec: /Users/miethe/Documents/Other/PKM/MeatyBrain/Blogs/My Voice.md — in full
  • At least one published post from src/content/posts/ — recent preferred, in full
  • Post spec — in full
• Research integration (as needed):
  • Read series materials from PKM Blogs/ directory if applicable
  • Use /notebooklm for source-grounded research
  • Use /gemini-cli for web search or external validation
  • Flag gaps; do not invent claims
• Draft MDX:
  • Write to PKM: MeatyBrain/Blogs/<Series>/<Post>/drafts/[post-slug]-draft.mdx
  • Include complete frontmatter (see references/frontmatter-schema.md)
  • Follow voice spec and structural patterns from published posts
  • Structure: problem/misconception → definition → practical why → decision components → recommendations with rationale → caveats → practical takeaway
  • Clear headings, scannable prose, code blocks, named tools
  • Ground all claims in spec, research, or lived experience
• Proceed to Phase 5

Phase 3.5: Forensic Grounding (optional)

Triggered by: Any Dev Stories or "I Let Claude Build My App" post — or any post making numeric claims about a shipped feature (story points, timelines, agent counts, session counts, percentages, parallelism).

Actions:

• Enumerate the PRs and features the post references
• For each feature, run:
  • ccdash feature list — find candidate features
  • ccdash feature show <id> — feature mapping and metadata
  • ccdash feature sessions <id> — session telemetry and task attribution grounded in provenance
• Save consolidated output to PKM: MeatyBrain/Blogs/<Series>/<Post>/notes/ccdash/ccdash-insights-report.md
• Use that report as the single source of truth for numeric claims in the draft

This step bridges Phase 3 and Phase 4 — the spec frames the story; the forensics report supplies the evidence. Validated on Dev Stories B2, where CCDash replaced several guessed metrics with verifiable numbers.

Phase 5: Review & Revision (Draft → Polish)

Triggered by: Mode shortcut (review, revise, story) or user signal "review this draft"

Invocation modes:

• Review mode: Read draft fully; produce annotated editorial feedback using references/review-checklist.md
  • Flag sections with [NEEDS INPUT: ...] when author input required
  • Identify voice departures and structural issues
  • Suggest 3-5 specific revisions with rationale
  • Recommend next phase (return to Phase 4 for major revisions, proceed to Phase 6 for minor polish)
• Revise mode: Apply editorial feedback directly to draft while preserving voice
• Story-craft mode: Evaluate series-level narrative: post sequencing, concept timing, payoff structure

Self-review checklist (see references/review-checklist.md for full detail):

• Thesis is clear and defensible
• Post offers meaningful insight or useful guidance
• All major claims are supported by spec, research, or lived experience
• Writing is skimmable (clear headings, segmented blocks)
• Tone matches published posts (confident, technical, practical, conversational)
• Every section has practical payoff
• Voice spec patterns present (long-medium sentences, contrast definitions, embedded caveats, direct reader address)
• Reduction-list phrases (generic AI language) are minimal or absent
• Series awareness maintained (concepts properly seeded, continuity with earlier posts)

Proceed to Phase 6 when ready (minor polish or voice integration remaining)

Phase 6: Publication Prep (Draft → Published)

Triggered by: User signal "ready to publish"

Actions:

• Finalize frontmatter (see references/frontmatter-schema.md):
  • Verify title (clear, specific, not generic or tagline-like)
  • Verify excerpt (one sentence, direct, specific)
  • Verify date (today or desired publish date)
  • Verify readTime (5 min, 8 min, etc.)
  • Verify contentType (essay or field-note)
  • Verify category (one of 7 fixed categories from taxonomy)
  • Verify tags (3-6 tags from src/data/taxonomy.ts registry only)
  • Set status to "published" or "evergreen"
  • Optional: series, seriesOrder, featured, whyItMatters, leaderTakeaway, relatedSlugs, seoTitle, seoDescription
• Structural polish:
  • Add internal links to related Signal to System posts
  • Verify code blocks have language identifiers
  • Ensure prose is scannable (no dense paragraphs, clear breaks)
  • Check formatting consistency
• Final content check:
  • Verify all claims are factual or attributed
  • Check links and references are valid
  • Verify code examples are tested
• Move to publication:
  • Copy finalized MDX from PKM drafts/ to src/content/posts/[post-slug].mdx
  • Also copy finalized MDX to PKM final/ directory (see PKM Folder Structure)
  • Verify move was successful
• Generate social summary:
  • Create social-summary.md in the PKM final/ directory alongside the published MDX
  • Format: YAML frontmatter (post, series, platform, created) + two sections:
    • LinkedIn Post (200-350 words): Hook with core insight, evidence highlights, key concepts, series context (if first post or new series, announce the series), forward pointer, link to post, 3-5 hashtags
    • Key Quotes for Pull: 2-4 standalone quotable lines from the post for social snippets or comment replies
  • Voice: match Nick's direct, practitioner tone — no marketing, no hype. Grounded in data and lived experience.
  • Delegate writing to a subagent with full context from the post
• Optional polish: Offer /humanizer for final pass reducing AI-detectable patterns

PKM Folder Structure

Each post in MeatyBrain/Blogs/<Series>/<Post N>/ follows this layout:

Post N/
├── drafts/                  # Working drafts, intermediate revisions
├── notes/                   # Research notes, review feedback, editorial notes, sources
├── final/                   # Published MDX, social summary
│   ├── <post-slug>.mdx
│   └── social-summary.md
└── Post N Outline.md        # Spec/outline stays at root level

Conventions:

• Series-level docs (Blog Series.md, Detailed Series Outline.md, Post N Outline.md) stay at their respective root level
• drafts/ holds iterative draft files (e.g., <slug>-draft-v1.mdx, <slug>-draft-v2.mdx)
• notes/ holds research, review feedback, humanizer notes, sources — anything informing the draft
• final/ holds the publication-ready MDX and the social summary
• When reorganizing an existing post folder, move files into the appropriate subdirectory; do not delete or rename content files

Key Rules

1. Never freewheel — draft from spec + research + voice doc. Flag gaps rather than inventing claims.
2. Structure over ornament — clarity and practical payoff beat "sounding nice." Thesis clarity beats ornamentation.
3. Voice calibration is mandatory — read voice spec and at least one published post before drafting Phase 4 content. Do not approximate Nick's voice.
4. PKM is the working space; blog repo is the published artifact — specs, drafts, research notes, and review feedback live in the PKM vault (MeatyBrain/Blogs/<Series>/<Post>/). Only final, publication-ready MDX gets copied to src/content/posts/. Do NOT save working files to docs/specs/ or docs/drafts/ in the blog repo.
5. Research grounding — use /notebooklm for source-grounded answers. Use /gemini-cli for web search. Prefer primary sources and lived experience.
6. Series awareness — check if post belongs to a series. If so, read series materials from PKM and maintain continuity with earlier posts. Load series brief from references/series-*.md.
7. Taxonomy compliance — respect the 7 fixed categories and tag registry. Do not invent new categories or tags. Escalate to user if post does not fit.
8. Voice guardrails — keep: nuanced recommendations, trade-off framing, "here's what matters in practice" energy, first-person experience, concrete examples, stated caveats. Reduce: empty universals, generic AI phrasing, fake certainty, excessive summaries, product-brochure energy.
9. Anti-patterns — don't flatten opinions into neutral prose; don't add hype or futurism; don't over-explain to technical readers; don't let posts read as purely skeptical; don't revise sections you weren't asked to touch; don't generate research claims without grounding.
10. Cite-or-cut — for posts making numeric claims about shipped features (story points, timelines, agent counts, session counts, percentages, parallelism), every number must trace to CCDash, git history, or another authoritative source. If a number can't be grounded, either cut it or replace with a qualitative claim. Guessed metrics undermine credibility and are a common failure mode in agent-driven Dev Stories posts; readers will notice when the math doesn't reconcile with the artifact.

Progressive Disclosure: What to Read When

Before any Phase 4 drafting or Phase 5 review/revision:

• Read voice spec in full: /Users/miethe/Documents/Other/PKM/MeatyBrain/Blogs/My Voice.md
• Read at least one recent published post from src/content/posts/

Before Phase 6 publication prep:

• Read references/frontmatter-schema.md for complete frontmatter rules and taxonomy details

If post belongs to a series:

• Read matching references/series-*.md file to understand post sequencing, key concepts, and continuity needs
• Load from: references/series-governed-agentic-sdlc.md, references/series-ai-workflows.md, references/series-cs-books.md, references/series-dev-stories.md

For editorial feedback or revision:

• Read references/review-checklist.md for full self-review criteria and voice guardrails

Integration with Other Skills

• /voice-writer — use for voice-calibrated drafting in Phase 4. Hand over spec and voice spec; receive publication-ready draft focused on matching Nick's authentic voice.
• /humanizer — use for final naturalness pass in Phase 6. Reduces AI-detectable patterns and increases idiomatic smoothness after drafting is complete.
• /notebooklm — use for research grounding in Phase 3–4. Pass source documents; get source-grounded summaries and Q&A for spec and draft.
• /gemini-cli — use for web search or second opinions during research phases. Useful for validating claims and finding external context.
• /nano-banana / /nano-banana-pro — use for diagrams or images to include in draft.
• /ccdash — use for forensic analysis of agent-driven development work during the research phase. Run for any post making claims about shipped features, agent rosters, session counts, timelines, or parallelism. Produces a notes/ccdash/ccdash-insights-report.md with feature mapping, session telemetry, and task attribution grounded in provenance — the source of truth for numeric claims.

Quality Checklist by Phase

Phase 3 (Post Design)

• Spec has clear thesis or core argument
• Section outline is 3-6 levels deep
• Key claims are sourced (research, experience, analysis)
• Series information noted (if applicable)
• Spec saved to PKM series directory

Phase 4 (Drafting)

• Voice spec was read in full
• At least one published post was read
• Spec, research materials, and series context were read
• For posts making numeric claims about shipped features, the CCDash forensics report has been generated and saved to notes/ccdash/ before drafting began
• Opening grounds topic in a real problem or misconception
• Every section has practical payoff
• Recommendations include rationale, not just verdicts
• Caveats and trade-offs stated clearly
• Tone and register match published posts
• Frontmatter is complete and uses valid taxonomy values
• Draft saved to PKM series directory (drafts/ subfolder)

Phase 5 (Review)

• Entire draft was read before feedback produced
• All Phase 4 checklist items verified
• Feedback is specific and actionable
• Gaps flagged with [NEEDS INPUT]
• Top revisions suggested with rationale

Phase 6 (Publication Prep)

• Frontmatter is finalized and verified
• Categories and tags are from fixed registry
• Internal links to related posts added
• Code blocks have language identifiers
• All claims are factual or sourced
• Final MDX moved to src/content/posts/
• Final MDX copied to PKM final/ directory
• Social summary generated in PKM final/social-summary.md
• PKM post folder organized per convention (drafts/, notes/, final/)

---

File locations: See references/ subdirectory for detailed schema, checklists, and series briefs.