| name | email-respond |
| description | Draft a reply to an existing email thread in Misha's voice - reads the incoming message, mirrors context, and answers with a Voss-calibrated response. Use when responding to a received email. Trigger when the user says "respond to this email", "reply to this", or "draft reply". Do NOT use for a new outbound email (use /email-draft). NEVER auto-sends - produces a draft for review. |
| argument-hint | [notes] |
| allowed-tools | Read, Bash(python3:*) |
| metadata | {"author":"Misha Hanin","email":"misha.hanin@odinix.com","version":"1.1"} |
| x-heading-orchestration | {"parallel_safe":true,"shared_state":[],"triggers":["respond to this email","reply to this","draft reply"]} |
| x-heading-capability | {"what":"Drafts a reply to an incoming email in Misha's voice - reads the sender's real intent, applies Voss tactical empathy, leads with the key point, and closes with a clear next step.\n","how":"Run /email-respond with the incoming email pasted below the divider (plus optional notes). Returns a draft reply, a subject line, and one pre-send flag. Drafts only - never sends.\n","when":"Use to reply to an email you received. For a new outbound email use /email-draft; to triage the whole inbox use /email-intel.\n"} |
| x-heading-routing | {"category":"Communication","triggers":["respond to this email","reply to this","draft reply"],"exclusions":["New outbound email -> /email-draft"],"compound":"No","router":"auto"} |
Email Response
Draft a response to an incoming email in Misha's voice.
Variables
notes: [Any specific points to make, things to avoid, or context not visible in the email — optional]
[Paste the email to respond to below the divider]
[PASTE INCOMING EMAIL HERE]
Instructions
Before drafting, read:
reference/misha-voice.md — Voice guide
context/people.md — Check if sender is listed; load relationship context
context/pipeline.md — Check if this relates to an active deal or conversation
Analyze the incoming email:
- What is the sender's real intent or question?
- What tone are they using?
- Is this a decision request, information request, relationship maintenance, or problem?
- Tactical empathy read: Apply Voss per
.claude/rules/voss.md. Surface emotions under the words; label tension/frustration before addressing substance; redirect demands with calibrated questions. Full framework: reference/voss-negotiation.md.
Draft a response that:
- Addresses the sender's actual intent (not just the surface question)
- Leads with the most important point
- Is appropriately brief — never longer than the incoming email unless complexity requires it
- Closes with a clear next step or acknowledgment
After the draft, provide:
- Subject line (if replying to a new thread or re-titling)
- One flag: anything to double-check before sending
NEVER
- NEVER send the reply. This skill drafts only — outbound send is always human-gated (lethal-trifecta control). The CEO sends or approves explicitly.
- NEVER fabricate facts or commitments not present in the incoming thread.