Menu
Reviews argument structure for complete claim-evidence chains and counterargument handling
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Reference for configuring, launching, and monitoring research iteration loops and analysis polish loops
Verifies the analysis pipeline runs end-to-end, outputs match expectations, and LaTeX compiles
Hands-on QA of the research analysis pipeline. Use whenever the user asks to verify the pipeline end-to-end, check output file integrity, validate table and figure generation, test data processing, or verify LaTeX compilation. Triggers on phrases like "test the pipeline", "QA the analysis", "check the outputs", "verify the tables", "run end-to-end", "does the paper compile", or any request to validate a research pipeline.
Define research question, hypotheses, methodology outline, and literature gap
Decompose a research question into cook-it-ready epic beads with methodology specifications
Comprehensive playbook for building rigorous, publication-quality research papers. Covers the full research output sequence from paper structure and statistical reporting through table formatting, figure design, LaTeX conventions, academic writing quality, and pre-submission review.
| name | Argument Structure Reviewer |
| description | Reviews argument structure for complete claim-evidence chains and counterargument handling |
Review-phase role checking that argument structures are complete, with proper claim-evidence-warrant chains and adequate counterargument handling.
Share findings via SendMessage: logical gaps affecting methodology go to statistical-methods-reviewer; framing issues go to theoretical-framing-reviewer.
AgentTeam member in the review phase. Spawned via TeamCreate. Communicate with teammates via SendMessage.
