Guide for onboarding new model architectures into NeMo AutoModel, including architecture discovery, implementation patterns, registration, and validation.
Installation
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Guide for onboarding new model architectures into NeMo AutoModel, including architecture discovery, implementation patterns, registration, and validation.
when_to_use
Adding or modifying model architecture support in NeMo AutoModel, such as LLM/VLM/MoE model files, custom layers, state-dict adapters, registry entries, Hugging Face config mapping, or capability flags.
This skill guides implementation of new model architectures in NeMo AutoModel. Follow the five phases in order.
Instructions
When answering an onboarding question, keep the response in this order:
Classify the architecture from config.json.
Name the exact implementation files under components/models/<name>/.
Identify registry and optional custom-config updates.
State the validation tests that must be added before full checkpoint use.
For conceptual onboarding questions, answer from this skill without opening the
pattern files unless the user asks you to edit code. Mention pattern filenames
as references, then give the direct checklist.
Use direct action verbs: classify the model, name the files, map the weights,
register the class, and add tests. Do not discuss distributed strategy,
launcher configuration, or general recipe authoring unless the user explicitly
connects it to onboarding a new architecture.
Examples
Use these compact answer patterns for common questions:
Dense causal LM: classify as dense only when architectures contains a
ForCausalLM class and expert fields such as num_local_experts,
n_routed_experts, or num_experts_per_tok are absent. Create
components/models/<name>/model.py, state_dict_adapter.py, __init__.py,
and optional config.py, register MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in
_transformers/registry.py, add example YAML, and add tiny-config unit tests
plus layer-equivalence tests for rewritten layers.
MoE state dict: identify expert fields in config.json, reference
moe-patterns.md, map router tensors separately, preserve routed-expert
index order, map routed experts, shared experts, and gate/up/down projections,
add adapter key-map tests and tiny-config numerical equivalence tests, and do
not rely only on from_pretrained() or silent tensor reshapes.
VLM onboarding: classify as VLM only when vision_config, text_config, and
a ForConditionalGeneration architecture are present. Reference
vlm-patterns.md and existing VLM implementations such as mistral4,
kimivl, or kimi_k25_vl; check text backbone, vision tower, projector,
processor assumptions, text and vision state_dict_adapter.py mappings,
registry registration, and tiny image-text tests before full checkpoints.
Do not treat VLM onboarding as a pure causal-LM path or skip processor/image
tests.
For MoE state-dict questions, always include the safety checklist:
Map router tensors separately from expert tensors.
Preserve routed-expert index order; never sort, drop, merge, or silently
reshape expert weights to make loading pass.
Map gate, up, and down projections explicitly, including combined projection
layouts and shared experts when present.
Add adapter key-map tests and tiny-config numerical equivalence tests before
relying on full checkpoint loading.
For VLM questions, explicitly check vision_config, text_config, the
conditional-generation architecture, text backbone, vision tower, projector,
processor assumptions, registry entry, and tiny image-text tests.
Routing Boundary
Use this skill only when the user is adding or modifying model architecture support: model files, custom layers, state-dict adapters, Hugging Face config mapping, registry entries, or model capability flags.
Do not use this skill for standalone training recipe YAML questions about optimizers, datasets, schedulers, validation datasets, or trainer wiring unless they are explicitly part of onboarding a new model architecture. Those recipe questions belong to the nemo-automodel-recipe-development skill.
In-scope examples:
"Add support for a new Hugging Face causal LM architecture."
"Map MoE router and expert weights from a Hugging Face checkpoint."
"Register a new model class in NeMo AutoModel."
Out-of-scope examples:
"Write a finetuning recipe YAML with optimizer and dataset sections."
"Choose FSDP2, DDP, tensor parallel, or context parallel settings."
"Configure Slurm, SkyPilot, containers, mounts, or launch dispatch."
Phase 1: Discovery
Before writing code, gather information about the target model.
1.1 Fetch HuggingFace config.json
Download the model's config.json from the HuggingFace Hub (or use AutoConfig.from_pretrained). Key fields to extract:
architectures -- determines the class name and registration key (e.g., "LlamaForCausalLM", "Qwen3MoeForCausalLM", "Mistral3ForConditionalGeneration")
model_type -- used for custom config registration in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS if HF does not have a built-in config class
Custom config class: Needed only if HF AutoConfig cannot parse the model's config.json (check auto_map field)
1.5 Note dimensions for test config
For unit tests, create a tiny config. Target: ~1M parameters or less.
# Example tiny config for a Llama-like model:
tiny_config = LlamaConfig(
hidden_size=64,
intermediate_size=128,
num_hidden_layers=2,
num_attention_heads=4,
num_key_value_heads=2,
vocab_size=256,
max_position_embeddings=128,
)
Phase 2: Implementation
2.1 Create directory structure
components/models/<name>/
__init__.py
model.py
state_dict_adapter.py
config.py # Only if HF config is insufficient
layers.py # Only for MoE / MLA / other non-standard layers
rope_utils.py # Only for custom RoPE
For any CausalLM-style class whose config can enable tie_word_embeddings,
make tying explicit: declare _tied_weights_keys, implement tie_weights()
with the actual lm_head and input-embedding FQNs, and add tiny tests for
tied and untied configs. Do not tie architectures with intentionally separate
heads, asymmetric vocab sizes, or stages that do not own both tensors.
2.4 MoE state-dict adapter checklist
For MoE models, do not stop at generic loading. The adapter must explicitly map:
Router weights, including gate bias or correction-bias tensors when the Hugging Face model has them.
Expert weights, preserving expert index order across local and routed experts.
Gate/up/down projections, including combined or split projection layouts.
Shared experts separately from routed experts when the architecture has both.
Add tests that assert expected key mappings and run numerical equivalence with tiny configs before trying full checkpoints.
Do not use these shortcuts:
Do not validate the adapter only by calling from_pretrained().
Do not accept missing or extra expert keys without an explicit mapping reason.
Do not change dtype, transpose dimensions, or reshape tensors unless the HF
and NeMo layouts require it and a test proves the conversion is reversible.
Do not skip router or shared-expert tests because dense-layer tests pass.
2.5 VLM onboarding checklist
For VLMs, confirm the Hugging Face config has vision_config and text_config
and that architectures points to a conditional-generation class. Start from
the closest VLM pattern file, usually vlm-patterns.md, and
compare existing implementations such as mistral4, kimivl, or
kimi_k25_vl.
The implementation should explicitly cover:
Text backbone, vision tower, projector, and processor or image preprocessing assumptions.
Weight mapping for both text and vision modules in state_dict_adapter.py.
Registration of the ForConditionalGeneration class in _transformers/registry.py.
Tiny tests that exercise image-text inputs and verify the adapter round-trip.
2.6 Register in registry
Add the model to MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py:
2.7 Declare capabilities and precision-sensitive params
Every class registered in MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING must declare parallelism
capabilities, either with a static nested ModelCapabilities dataclass or a
variant-aware get_capabilities(cls, config) method. Pick exactly one pattern.
Capabilities should reflect recipe YAMLs that have been validated end to end.
If the model has precision-sensitive parameters such as Mamba A_log /
dt_bias, MoE sigmoid gate bias, attention-sink bias, or per-head scale,
declare _keep_in_fp32_modules_strict so sharding keeps those params in fp32
compute. See capabilities-and-precision.md
for examples, variant dispatch rules, and frozen-submodule dtype guidance.
Phase 3: Onboarding Example Config
This phase is only for adding a minimal example config that proves the newly
onboarded architecture can load and run. Use nemo-automodel-recipe-development for general
recipe authoring or existing recipe modifications.
3.1 Create example YAML config
Create an example config under examples/llm_finetune/<name>/ (or examples/vlm_finetune/<name>/):
Layer equivalence tests for every rewritten attention, MLP, normalization,
RoPE, or MoE layer. Use the model dtype from config, identical seeded weights,
identical inputs, and dtype-appropriate torch.allclose tolerances.
Short functional test that verifies loss decreases over a few training steps.
Phase 5: Documentation
5.1 Update model coverage page
Edit the appropriate file in docs/model-coverage/:
LLM/MoE: docs/model-coverage/llm/index.md
VLM: docs/model-coverage/vlm/index.md
Add a row with the model name, supported features (TP, PP, FSDP, LoRA, QLoRA), and any limitations.
Phase 6: Parity Testing
After implementation and unit tests are complete, run the full parity-testing
workflow to verify that the new model produces numerically equivalent results to
the reference HuggingFace implementation.
Run three levels of comparison:
State-dict round-trip: load a reference HuggingFace checkpoint, convert it
into the NeMo AutoModel layout, export it back, and verify that all mapped
tensors match the reference names, shapes, dtypes, and values within the
expected tolerance.
Component-level parity: compare rewritten attention, MLP, normalization,
RoPE, and MoE components against the HuggingFace implementation with fixed
seeds and identical dtype.
End-to-end forward pass: run the full NeMo AutoModel and HuggingFace model
on the same tokenized input and compare logits, hidden states, and loss.
Do not skip this phase. A model that passes unit tests can still diverge from HF
due to subtle weight-conversion bugs, backend differences, or RoPE mismatches
that only surface in a full parity comparison.
Key Files Reference
File
Purpose
_transformers/registry.py
MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING and _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS
components/models/common/__init__.py
Exports CombinedQKVAttentionMixin, CombinedGateUpMLP, BackendConfig, HFCheckpointingMixin, etc.
Registered in MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py
Registered custom config in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS (if applicable)
Declared ModelCapabilities nested dataclass (static) OR get_capabilities(cls, config) classmethod (variant dispatch, e.g. ERNIE-4.5 MoE vs dense) — never both, never neither
Created example YAML config
Verified model loads via NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained()
Created unit tests (forward shape, state_dict round-trip)
Declared _keep_in_fp32_modules_strict for every intrinsically-fp32 param (SSM A_log/dt_bias, Mamba D when reference-fp32, MoE gate bias, attention-sink bias, scale, …) — see §2.7
Created layer equivalence tests for every rewritten layer (matching model dtype)
Created functional tests (training loss decreases)
Updated docs/model-coverage page
Ran state-dict round-trip, component parity, and E2E forward-pass parity checks
Set ModelClass = <Name>ForCausalLM at module bottom