cpp-core-guidelines-review

name	cpp-core-guidelines-review
description	Parallel C++ Core Guidelines code review using multiple specialized sub-agents. Use when reviewing C++ code, modules, or files against C++ Core Guidelines to identify violations. Each sub-agent reviews against a specific guideline section (Functions, Classes, Resource Management, etc.) and outputs findings to separate markdown files in the review/ directory, followed by a consolidated summary.

C++ Core Guidelines Review

Overview

Review C++ code against the C++ Core Guidelines by launching parallel sub-agents, each analyzing code against a specific guideline section. This skill ensures comprehensive coverage while maintaining high confidence in violation identification.

Workflow

Step 1: Understand Scope Clarification

Before launching any sub-agents, clarify the review scope with the user:

1. Target files/directories: Which C++ source files or directories to review?
2. File patterns: What file extensions should be included? (e.g., .cpp, .h, .hpp)
3. Exclusions: Any files or directories to exclude?

Important: Do not proceed until the scope is clearly defined and unambiguous.

Step 2: Launch Parallel Sub-Agents

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS:

• You MUST launch one sub-agent for EVERY file in references/Content/. Do not skip any files. Each guideline section requires its own dedicated sub-agent.
• Use the guideline-section-reviewer agent in agents/guideline-section-reviewer.md from this plugin for each sub-agent.

Parallel launch strategy: To maximize performance, launch all sub-agents in parallel by sending multiple Task tool calls in a single response message. The Task tool documentation explicitly states: "When the user specifies that they want you to run agents 'in parallel', you MUST send a single message with multiple Task tool use content blocks."

Launch one sub-agent per guideline section. Each sub-agent:

• Reviews only against rules in its assigned guideline file
• Outputs findings to <current-working-directory>/review/<SectionName>.md
• Reports violations with: file path, line numbers, code snippet, and specific rule(s) violated

Agent invocation process:

1. Read the agent template: Read the agent definition from agents/guideline-section-reviewer.md
2. Substitute parameters: Replace the template variables in the agent file with actual values:
   • {{SECTION_NAME}}: The display name of the section (e.g., "Functions")
   • {{SECTION_FILE}}: The filename of the section in references/Content/ (e.g., "Functions.md")
   • {{TARGET_FILES_PATTERN}}: The files/directories to review (e.g., "src/**/*.cpp" or specific file paths)
   • {{OUTPUT_DIR}}: The output directory (typically <current-working-directory>/review)
   • {{DATE}}: Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format
   • {{FILES_COUNT}}: Number of files being reviewed
   • {{VIOLATION_COUNT}}: Placeholder, will be filled by agent
3. Launch the agent: Use the Task tool with subagent_type=general and the substituted prompt as the agent's instruction

Example invocation:

For section "Functions":
- Read agent template from agents/guideline-section-reviewer.md
- Substitute: SECTION_NAME="Functions", SECTION_FILE="Functions.md", etc.
- Launch guideline-section-reviewer agent with substituted prompt

The agent will:

1. Read the guideline section from the plugin's references/Content/ directory
2. Review the target files against that section's rules
3. Output findings to <OUTPUT_DIR>/<SECTION_NAME>.md
4. Report violations with file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and specific rule violations

Step 3: Wait for All Sub-Agents

After launching all sub-agents, collect their task IDs and wait for completion:

Waiting process:

1. Track task IDs: Store the task ID returned by each Task tool invocation
2. Wait for completion: For each task ID, use TaskOutput with:
   • task_id: The task ID from the sub-agent launch
   • block=true: Wait until the sub-agent completes
   • timeout=600000 (10 minutes): Maximum wait time per agent
3. Verify success: Check that each sub-agent:
   • Completed without errors
   • Created its output file in <current-working-directory>/review/<SectionName>.md
   • Did not modify any source files

Error handling:

• If a sub-agent fails: Report the error to the user and continue with other agents
• If timeout occurs: Note which agents timed out and report to user
• If output file missing: Indicate which section's review is incomplete

Verification checklist:

• All sub-agents have been launched
• All sub-agents have completed (or reported failures)
• Output files exist for each completed section
• No source files were modified

Step 4: Generate Summary

After all sub-agents complete, create <current-working-directory>/review/Summary.md with a comprehensive analysis of all findings.

Process:

1. Read all section review files from <current-working-directory>/review/*.md (excluding Summary.md itself)
2. Aggregate violation counts, affected files, and rule violations
3. Generate summary using the template below

Summary.md template:

# C++ Core Guidelines Review Summary

## Overview

**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Review Scope**: <Files/directories reviewed>
**Total Sections Reviewed**: <Number of sections completed>
**Total Violations Found**: <Total count across all sections>

## Summary by Section

| Section | Violations | Most Violated Rule |
|---------|------------|-------------------|
| Functions | N | F.15, ... |
| Classes and Class Hierarchies | N | C.7, ... |
| Resource Management | N | R.1, ... |
| [Continue for all sections] | | |

## Summary by File

| File | Total Violations | Top Violation Categories |
|------|------------------|--------------------------|
| path/to/file1.cpp | N | Resource Management, Error Handling |
| path/to/file2.h | M | Const Correctness, Interfaces |
| [Continue for affected files] | | |

## Top Violations by Frequency

| Rank | Rule ID | Rule Summary | Count |
|------|---------|--------------|-------|
| 1 | F.15 | Prefer simple and default constructs | N |
| 2 | R.3 | Raw pointers should not be used | M |
| [Continue] | | | |

## Critical Findings

### High-Priority Issues
<List violations with high impact or security implications>

### Most Common Patterns
<Identify recurring violation patterns across the codebase>





See: []()



See: []()





 : 
 : 
 : 



 : 
 : 
 : 
 : 

Key requirements for summary:

• Include exact violation counts aggregated from all section reports
• Sort tables by violation count (descending) where applicable
• Link to individual section reports for detailed findings
• Highlight patterns and systemic issues
• Provide actionable recommendations based on findings

Critical Constraints (Highest Priority)

1. No modifications: This skill and all sub-agents MUST NOT modify reviewed files. Write operations ONLY to <current-working-directory>/review/ directory.
2. Main session non-involvement: Main conversation MUST NOT perform code review. Only coordinate sub-agents.
3. Section-specific enforcement: Each sub-agent reviews ONLY against its assigned section. Cross-section violations are not reported.
4. Rule correspondence: Every reported violation MUST map to a specific guideline rule. Unmappable findings are invalid.
5. High confidence threshold: Only report violations with high confidence. Uncertain cases must be omitted.
6. Violations only: Report ONLY guideline violations. Do NOT report code that follows guidelines correctly. Positive/conforming code must NOT appear in findings.

C++ Core Guidelines Structure

The C++ Core Guidelines reference files are bundled in this skill's references/ directory:

• Introduction.md - Overview and glossary
• Content/ - Individual guideline sections

Each section contains multiple rules with:

• Rule identifier (e.g., "C.7", "F.15")
• Rule statement
• Rationale (Reason)
• Examples (positive/negative)
• Exceptions (if applicable)
• Enforcement suggestions

User Interaction Patterns

Example 1: Review specific files

User: "Review src/transaction.cpp and src/account.h against C++ Core Guidelines"

→ Clarify scope, then launch sub-agents for those files.

Example 2: Review directory

User: "Review all C++ files in the services/ directory"

→ Clarify file patterns and exclusions, then launch sub-agents.

Example 3: Review against specific sections

User: "Review using only Resource Management and Error Handling guidelines"

→ Launch only those two sub-agents.