| name | create-context-file |
| description | Creates a structured, date-stamped context file filed by typology (findings, plans, guides, follow-ups, merge-requests, tickets, decisions, notes, research) with YAML frontmatter. Use when saving a finding, writing a plan, capturing a guide, recording a decision, logging a follow-up, filing a merge-request note, plus ticket write-ups. |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","audience":"agents","workflow":"capture, planning, documentation"} |
Create Context File
Persist a working artifact into the project's context directory, filed by
typology and named with a date prefix so it sorts chronologically and never
collides.
When to Use
- Save an investigation write-up, plan, guide, or decision produced while working.
- Capture a follow-up, merge-request note, or ticket write-up for later.
- The user asks to "save this finding", "create a plan", or "write this up".
When Not to Use
- Do NOT use for technical notes that belong inline in source — write a code comment.
- Do NOT use for permanent, long-lived docs — use the README or docs site.
- Do NOT use for issue tracking — use the issue tracker.
- Do NOT use for content the team consumes externally — use the docs system.
Principles
- Typology is the organizing axis. ALWAYS choose the folder by what the
artifact is, not by how long it lives.
- One artifact, one file. ALWAYS keep a single typology per file; NEVER
merge a finding with a plan.
- Deterministic names. The generator MUST own the filename and frontmatter;
never hand-craft them.
- Curated growth. Extend the typology set deliberately, not per task.
Workflow
-
Choose the typology from the curated set. — Stop if: none fits and the
need will not recur; reuse the closest match instead of adding a folder.
-
Inspect what already exists for that typology to avoid duplicates:
ls .context/findings/
Expected result: the existing files, so you can confirm none already covers
this artifact.
-
Run the generator with a specific, task-tied title. — Verify: the printed
path uses the expected typology plus date.
-
Fill in the body beneath the generated heading. — Stop if: the content
spans two typologies; split it into separate files.
Quick Commands
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type findings --title "Auth token analysis" \
--tags "auth,oauth"
Expected result: a new dated finding file, printed as the only stdout line.
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type plans --title "Retriever rollout" << 'EOF'
...
EOF
Expected result: a dated plan file containing the heredoc body.
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type merge-requests --title "PROJ-1234" --dry-run
Expected result: the target path plus full file body printed; nothing written.
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type experiments --title "spike" --allow-new-type
Expected result: a file under a new typology folder, created knowingly.
Full option list: see the CLI reference below.
Anti-Patterns
NEVER create a file without checking the typology folder first
WHY: the same artifact captured twice fragments context and breaks search.
BAD: run the generator immediately for a plan that already exists.
GOOD: list the folder, confirm nothing covers it, then create.
Consequence: duplicate, drifting files that later readers cannot reconcile —
a common pitfall once a repository grows.
NEVER use a generic slug like notes or todo
WHY: vague slugs collide and read as noise when sorted by date.
BAD: --title "notes" yields a notes.md that clashes across tasks.
GOOD: --title "API refactor findings" yields a specific, searchable name.
Consequence: unsearchable filenames plus silent name clashes in production
repositories.
NEVER mix typologies in one file
WHY: a finding, a plan, and a follow-up have different lifecycles and readers.
BAD: one file holding analysis, a rollout plan, and open questions.
GOOD: three files, one per typology, cross-referenced if needed.
Consequence: no file can be retired cleanly; each keeps stale content alive.
NEVER hand-edit the filename or frontmatter date
WHY: the date prefix plus ISO date power sorting and downstream tooling.
BAD: rename to drop the date, or set date: Jul 21st.
GOOD: let the generator produce both; keep the original date on later edits.
Consequence: broken chronological ordering plus frontmatter parse failures.
NEVER invent a new typology for a one-off
WHY: ad-hoc folders erode the curated set that makes context navigable.
BAD: create a bespoke folder for a single throwaway note.
GOOD: reuse the closest typology, or pass --allow-new-type knowingly.
Consequence: folder sprawl that defeats predictable retrieval — a slow pitfall.
References
- Typologies — the curated catalog, selection rule, and how to extend the set; load when choosing or adding a typology.
- CLI reference — full generator flags, behavior, and examples; load when you need an option beyond the Quick Commands.