Load this skill BEFORE making any change to the fastWorkflow repo that touches git, beads (bd), version numbers, tests, or documents in docs/. Triggers: "commit this", "push", "bump the version", "close the issue", "bd create/update/close", "delete this test", "clean up docs/", "should this get a design doc?", "is this a patch or a minor?", "can I commit the skills library?". Also load when you see symptoms like a bd close that didn't stick, an epic that looks shipped but shows open, or untracked team-private docs in git status. Do NOT load for debugging runtime failures (use fastworkflow-debugging-playbook), for running/operating the app (fastworkflow-run-and-operate), or for how-to-test mechanics (fastworkflow-validation-and-qa).
Installation
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Load this skill BEFORE making any change to the fastWorkflow repo that touches git, beads (bd), version numbers, tests, or documents in docs/. Triggers: "commit this", "push", "bump the version", "close the issue", "bd create/update/close", "delete this test", "clean up docs/", "should this get a design doc?", "is this a patch or a minor?", "can I commit the skills library?". Also load when you see symptoms like a bd close that didn't stick, an epic that looks shipped but shows open, or untracked team-private docs in git status. Do NOT load for debugging runtime failures (use fastworkflow-debugging-playbook), for running/operating the app (fastworkflow-run-and-operate), or for how-to-test mechanics (fastworkflow-validation-and-qa).
fastWorkflow Change Control
TEAM-PRIVATE: embeds content from uncommitted internal docs. Do not commit or publish this skill without the developer'sexplicit approval.
How changes are classified, gated, reviewed, versioned, and released in this repo — and the
four non-negotiable rules, each earned through a real incident. This is policy inferred from
what actually happened in git history and the beads tracker, not aspiration.
Jargon, defined once:
bd / beads — the git-backed issue tracker used here (bd CLI; source of truth is .beads/issues.jsonl). Issue IDs look like fix-vof, children like fix-vof.1.
Epic — a bd issue of type epic with child issues.
tau-bench / tau2-bench (τ²-bench) — public customer-service agent benchmarks this project reports scores on. "Parity" = running under standard, unmodified benchmark conditions.
Design doc of record — a markdown file in docs/ that a change was reviewed against (e.g. docs/turn_result_design_final.md).
Adversarial review — a structured pass where reviewers (here: parallel AI review agents) attack a design and every finding gets a written resolution.
1. When to use / when NOT to use
Use this skill when deciding whether and how a change may land: commit/push etiquette, bd workflow, design-review gating, version bumps, test removal, and what may never enter the public repo.
Your actual need
Use instead
Why the architecture is shaped this way; invariants
Each rule exists because something went wrong. Cite the incident when enforcing the rule.
Rule 1 — NEVER git commit or git push without the developer's explicit request in that turn
Rule: No agent commits or pushes on its own initiative. A session-close protocol, a "wrap up" instruction, or a finished task does NOT override this. Explicit request, that turn, every time. Files written into the repo tree may still be private/team-only.
Rationale: The repo is PUBLIC on GitHub. Anything pushed is published to the world instantly; team-private strategy documents live inside the working tree as untracked files, so blanket staging (git add -A, git add .) is a publication event.
Incident: 2026-07-08 — a private planning doc was auto-committed and pushed to the public repo by an agent following a session-close routine. Recovery required a git history rewrite on a public repository. Recorded as a bd memory (bd memories --json, key never-git-commit-or-push-anything-without-dhar).
Corollaries: stage files by explicit path only, never -A/.; check git status for untracked private docs before any commit you were asked to make (see §7 for the do-not-commit list).
Rule 2 — One bd write at a time; verify the JSONL after each; never trust bd close --reason
Rule: Serialize all bd write commands. After every write, confirm it landed: grep '"id":"<issue-id>"' .beads/issues.jsonl and check the field you changed. Use bare bd close <id> (works) and add the close note via a separate verified update — bd close <id> --reason "..."reports success but silently fails to persist.
Rationale: The bd backend (a Dolt SQL server; repo-root config.yaml is its config, port 3307) can wedge into a state where every command re-imports issues.jsonl into an empty DB and async exports race and clobber each other. .beads/issues.jsonl is the source of truth; when bd is wedged, patching the JSONL directly is safe because every command re-imports it.
Incident: observed 2026-06-11 during the fix-vof review epic; recorded as bd memory beads-flakiness-observed-2026-06-11-in-the. Likely collateral: epic fix-7kp is a duplicate (created seconds apart) of the closed fix-2jo — same title, one closed, one open.
Doc-rot warning:AGENTS.md (lines 42 and 68) still recommends bd close bd-42 --reason "Completed" --json — the exact invocation the memory says silently fails. The 2026-06-11 memory overrides the AGENTS.md boilerplate. Trust the memory.
Rule 3 — Never let tests or experiments wipe trained example models
Rule: Nothing may delete or retrain-in-place fastworkflow/examples/*/___command_info (the trained intent-model artifacts: tinymodel.pth, largemodel.pth, threshold.json, ...). Tests and experiments that need training must copytree the workflow into a temp dir (tmp_path_factory) and train the copy.
Rationale: These artifacts are gitignored (.gitignore lines 2–5), exist only because a developer ran fastworkflow train locally with real API keys, and other tests depend on them silently. Destroying them costs a paid retraining run and breaks unrelated tests with confusing FileNotFoundErrors.
Incident:fix-0hb, fixed in commit fa97b48 (2026-06-15). A module-scoped fixture in tests/test_train_modern_stack.py ran shutil.rmtree(<workflow>/___command_info) on the REAL bundled hello_world example at setup AND teardown. The next full-suite run lost threshold.json and 4 test_fastapi_service.py tests failed. Fix: train into a temp copy; suite went 478 passed / 0 failed and is now idempotent.
Rule 4 — tau-bench benchmark parity is sacred
Rule: Never modify tau-bench / tau2-bench tools or tasks for benchmark runs. Any nonstandard trade must be disclosed in the results write-up, never silent.
Rationale: The project's headline external claim is small-model parity on tau-bench; a silently modified harness would invalidate the claim and the credibility behind it. The team-private tau2 plan encodes this as a design constraint, e.g. (docs/tau2_retail_reliability_implementation_plan.md): line 43 — "Tool layer | The Sierra/τ-bench tool implementations in tools/*.py. Defines benchmark parity — we do not modify these."; line 199 — "Pinning sim temperature/seed raises the ceiling but changes standard benchmark conditions — a disclosed trade if we make it."; line 630 — new search commands must be "fastWorkflow command-layer additions over load_data(), benchmark-parity-safe", with "the τ² tools themselves are untouched".
Incident: none yet — this is the one rule established preventively, because the tau2 reliability program (experiment cards E0–E25) will create constant temptation. Keep it that way.
3. Change classification: which gate does my change need?
There is no written gating policy; this table is de-facto policy inferred from git history, stated here so it becomes explicit. When in doubt, ask Dhar — he is the only approver (421 of 450 commits on main).
Tier
What qualifies
Required artifacts
Precedent
T0 — plain fix
Bug fix, dependency bump, perf fix, cache/staleness fix; no public contract change; roughly ≤ ~200 lines across ≤ ~4 source files
bd issue (before code), tests, patch version bump in the same commit, fix: vX.Y.Z — ... subject
New subsystem or concurrency/persistence semantics; new files; minor version bump; but contract already settled
Design doc committed to docs/ alongside code; bd epic with step-scoped children; verification evidence in close notes
cf3eeae v2.22.0: fastworkflow/run_fastapi_mcp/turns.py (424 lines) + docs/fastworkflow_turns_async_execution_design.md (538 lines) + epic fix-85g with 13 children, shipped Step 1 only; close notes record "full suite 457 passed"
T2 — adversarial-review change
Changes the data model, public wire contract, or system-of-record semantics — anything many future decisions will sit on
The full fix-vof pipeline (below)
TurnResult redesign, v2.21
The fix-vof model (T2), as a checklist
The TurnResult redesign is the repo's reference process for high-stakes changes. Gate rationale and cost/benefit: references/fix-vof-case-study.md (which points to the reusable procedure in fastworkflow-research-methodology and the full chronicle in fastworkflow-failure-archaeology).
One bd child per finding under a review-only epic (fix-vof, 48 children, "review-only — no implementation. Work one finding at a time").
One docs-commit per resolution, each a decision record. Verified format of 42e9b3a ("docs: resolve R1"): decision + rationale in body, then a trailer block: - design doc: Amendment A7 / - review doc: R1 marked resolved / - beads: fix-vof.1 closed (epic 7/48).
Second-order review of the resolved design by ten parallel review agents — docs/turn_result_architecture_review.md (concerns X1–X12). This stage reversed one ratified decision (X1) and found a two-amendment contradiction (X3).
Consolidated final spec that supersedes everything — docs/turn_result_design_final.md ("where this conflicts with any of those, this document wins").
Human pushback/teaching session — docs/turn_result_design_feedback.md (354 lines). This stage caught that the shipped v2.21 slice did NOT actually fix the user-visible bug.
Learning checklist for mastery tracking — docs/turn_result_learning_checklist.md.
Only then: implementation, sliced minimal (X6 shrank the plan from ~2.5k lines/120 files to ~500 lines/6 files, user-approved).
Gate triggers for T2 (any one suffices): breaking wire change (fix-qtq is explicitly labeled "a BREAKING WIRE CHANGE" and is held at T2-pending); new persistent record type or serialization format; semantics of success/failure reporting; anything the tau2 campaign will report externally.
Review-interaction rule (bd memory, established 2026-06-10, R11): in design reviews with Dhar, ALWAYS give an ELI5 plain-language explanation of each finding BEFORE asking decision questions via AskUserQuestion.
4. Beads discipline
Issue before code. Every T0+ change gets a bd issue first; discovered work gets a linked issue (--deps discovered-from:<parent-id>). AGENTS.md mandates bd for ALL tracking — no markdown TODOs, no duplicate trackers. Close notes must carry verification evidence (the house pattern: "Step 1 implemented & verified (full suite 457 passed)").
Doc-rot note:.cursor/rules/dev_workflow.mdc and taskmaster.mdc (both alwaysApply: true) still prescribe Task Master. Beads is the live system; the taskmaster rules are stale. Do not adopt Task Master.
Command reference (verified against this repo's bd)
do not use --reason (Rule 2); record the close note via a verified update instead
Inspect
bd show <id> --json / bd list --status open / bd stats
read-only, always safe
Memories
bd memories --json
bd memories show <name> is invalid ("accepts at most 1 arg"); use --json or a search term
Verify a write
grep '"id":"<id>"' .beads/issues.jsonl
JSONL is source of truth
Flakiness protocol (from the 2026-06-11 memory): one bd write at a time → verify .beads/issues.jsonl → if the Dolt server wedges (every command re-imports into an empty DB), restarting helps only partially; patching issues.jsonl directly is safe. Note .beads/issues.jsonl currently sits staged-but-uncommitted — per Rule 1 it awaits the developer'scommit; do not commit it yourself.
The stale-epic problem — needs owner adjudication, do NOT adjudicate yourself
These epics look shipped-but-open. The code demonstrably exists on main, yet children show open. Closing them requires a decision only Dhar can make (residual scope vs. forgotten bookkeeping):
Epic
Status shown
Evidence code shipped
Why it may be intentionally open
fix-yy1 (v2.21 TurnResult capture)
open, children open
fastworkflow/turn.py, process_turn at workflow_execution_context.py:484, shipped afcbe01
Its own notes say "Tasks left open until approval+commit" — approval happened, closure forgotten? Ask Dhar.
fix-qtq (TurnOutput wire cutover)
open, 9 children
turns.py types WorkFn as returning TurnOutput
Genuinely incomplete: run_fastapi_mcp/utils.py:427 still serves the old shape; breaking wire change pending. Likely legitimately open.
fix-7kp (speedict removal)
open
fix-2jo (identical title) CLOSED, shipped v2.21.4
Duplicate from the flaky-bd era — or an intentional extension (speedict remains in cache_matching.py, workflow.py, session_state_store.py). Ask Dhar.
5. Version and release conventions
Source of truth:pyproject.toml:12 (version = "2.22.2"). There is no CHANGELOG file; the git log is the changelog.
Bump ships inside the release commit — every release commit touches pyproject.toml (verified on 0e68284, b5747df, 033132f).
Subject format:fix: vX.Y.Z — <lowercase summary> for patches, feat: vX.Y.Z — <summary> for minors. Em dash (—), not hyphen. Append the bd issue in parens when there is one: fix: v2.21.5 — auto-evict abandoned Workflow session state (fix-04r), feat: v2.22.0 — turns-based async execution for run_fastapi_mcp (fix-85g Step 1).
Docs-only commits:docs: <summary>, no version bump. Test-only: test: <summary> (fa97b48).
Patch (x.y.Z) = bug fix, dependency/CVE bump, perf/staleness fix, no new public capability (v2.21.1–.6, v2.22.1–.2). Minor (x.Y.0) = new capability or subsystem, usually with a design doc and epic (v2.21.0 TurnResult, v2.22.0 turns engine). v2.17.x accumulated 35 patches — long patch trains on one minor are normal here. Major: v3.0 is reserved for the breaking wire/model collapse per turn_result_design_final.md §14–15 (designed, unbuilt).
Tags lag and are best-effort: tags exist through v2.22.0 but v2.22.1/v2.22.2 are untagged. Never treat tags as the release record; use pyproject + commit subjects.
Publishing:make publish (poetry build + publish to PyPI); make publish-testpypi for rehearsal. Both depend on gen-env (see §7 foot-gun). Per Rule 1, releases happen only on the developer'sexplicit request.
Agent trailer: commits authored with Claude Code end with Co-Authored-By: Claude ... <noreply@anthropic.com> (verified on 42e9b3a).
6. Test-removal prohibition
From .cursor/rules/testing_rules.mdc (alwaysApply: true), verbatim:
Don't use Mock fixtures. All our tests are integration tests
Do not remove pytest tests without explicit user approval
Operational meaning:
Never delete, @pytest.mark.skip, or comment out a test to make a change pass. If a test blocks you, that is a finding — file a bd issue and ask. Permanent skips that exist today (11 markers, e.g. tests/test_workflow_training.py:74,137 "takes too long") were each user-approved decisions.
Reality check (doc-rot, documented, not license): 11 test files already import unittest.mock/MagicMock (mostly to stub LLM/dspy calls while keeping workflows real). The no-mocks rule is aspirational in places — that is NOT permission to add new mocks; prefer the real test workflows tests/example_workflow/, tests/hello_world_workflow/ (and note CLAUDE.md omits the on-disk tests/todo_list_workflow/ naming — tests/example_workflow IS the todo-list app).
Changing a test's assertion to match new intended behavior is a normal T0/T1 change; removing its coverage is what needs approval.
CI runs only tests/test_train_modern_stack.py (single workflow .github/workflows/train-modern-stack.yml) — so a removed test will NOT be caught by CI. The full 495-test suite is local-only: source .venv/bin/activate && python -m pytest. Run it before release commits; Rule 3 applies to how training tests isolate themselves.
7. The public-repo boundary
The GitHub repo is public (Apache 2.0). Treat every commit as a press release.
NEVER commit or push (without the developer'sexplicit, per-item approval):
docs/Article*.pdf, docs/Analysis and Recommendations...docx (untracked)
pre-publication drafts
This skill library
.claude/skills/ (untracked)
team-private until Dhar decides; embeds the docs above
Secrets
passwords/ (gitignored), any real *.passwords.env
API keys
Sharp edges verified:
.claude/skills/ is untracked but NOT gitignored (git check-ignore .claude/skills/... matches nothing), and .claude/rules/command-authoring.md IS tracked — so git add .claude or git add -A would stage the private library. Stage by explicit file path only.
Untracked ≠ private-safe: the 2026-07-08 incident (Rule 1) was exactly an untracked private doc getting auto-committed.
env/.env IS tracked — deliberately: it holds model-name config only (verified: zero key/token/secret lines). Real keys belong in gitignored passwords/. The bundled template fastworkflow/examples/fastworkflow.passwords.env is tracked but contains a dead placeholder key.
gen-env.sh foot-gun:make gen-env (a dependency of make publish) merges every *.env in the tree — including gitignored password files — into root .env. Root /.env is gitignored, but never copy/rename/commit that merged file, and never widen the .gitignore negations (lines 141–143) without review.
There IS a sanctioned path for public skills: fastworkflow/docs/integrate-chat-agent/SKILL.md was deliberately committed in 1d3a6aa. Public skill ⇒ that directory, with approval. Team-private skill ⇒ .claude/skills/, uncommitted.
Public claims (benchmark numbers, DOI — note README and the Article PDFs currently disagree on the paper DOI) are governed by fastworkflow-docs-and-positioning; do not add or edit external claims as a side effect of a code change.
No routing around change control: nothing in this skill authorizes bypassing a gate because it is inconvenient. If a gate seems wrong, that is a conversation with Dhar, not an exception you grant yourself.
8. Provenance and maintenance
Facts verified 2026-07-09 against v2.22.2 (commit c33b9a5). This skill also embeds content from uncommitted team-private docs (tau2 plan) and bd memories, both volatile.
for i in fix-yy1 fix-qtq fix-7kp fix-2jo; do bd show $i --json | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); d=d[0] if isinstance(d,list) else d; print(d['id'],d['status'])"; done
bd close --reason still broken
do NOT test destructively; check bd memories --json for a newer memory superseding 2026-06-11, and check bd version
AGENTS.md still recommends --reason (doc-rot)
grep -n 'close bd-42' AGENTS.md
Test-removal rule text
sed -n '1,12p' .cursor/rules/testing_rules.mdc
.claude/skills not ignored; only rules file tracked
