RebeccAi (rebecc.ai) platform help — a cheap AI business-idea evaluator + one-off business-plan generator for solo founders and indie hackers: describe an idea (plus team size, budget, and a chosen "feedback personality") and it returns a quick evaluation, a strengths/weaknesses assessment, improvement tips, and an optional ready-to-use business plan. Use when running an idea through RebeccAi, interpreting its score or evaluation points, using the improve-my-idea suggestions, buying the one-time business plan, understanding the free tier's daily-idea and character caps vs Premium, wondering why the feedback feels flattering (the personality toggle biases tone), or asking whether it has an API. UI-only, NO public API/webhooks/Zapier/MCP; an AI evaluation is not validated demand and its plan financials are AI estimates. Do NOT use for the validate-before-building method or comparing idea validators across the market (use /sales-idea-validation), or building the smoke-test landing page (use /sales-funnel).
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
RebeccAi (rebecc.ai) platform help — a cheap AI business-idea evaluator + one-off business-plan generator for solo founders and indie hackers: describe an idea (plus team size, budget, and a chosen "feedback personality") and it returns a quick evaluation, a strengths/weaknesses assessment, improvement tips, and an optional ready-to-use business plan. Use when running an idea through RebeccAi, interpreting its score or evaluation points, using the improve-my-idea suggestions, buying the one-time business plan, understanding the free tier's daily-idea and character caps vs Premium, wondering why the feedback feels flattering (the personality toggle biases tone), or asking whether it has an API. UI-only, NO public API/webhooks/Zapier/MCP; an AI evaluation is not validated demand and its plan financials are AI estimates. Do NOT use for the validate-before-building method or comparing idea validators across the market (use /sales-idea-validation), or building the smoke-test landing page (use /sales-funnel).
argument-hint
[describe what you need help with in RebeccAi]
license
MIT
version
1.0.0
tags
["sales","validation","pre-launch","platform"]
RebeccAi Platform Help
RebeccAi (rebecc.ai — note: rebeccai.com is a parked/for-sale domain, not the product) is a
low-cost AI business-idea evaluator and one-off business-plan generator for solo founders, indie
hackers, and first-time entrepreneurs. You describe an idea in a single text box — plus your team
size, budget, and a chosen "feedback personality" — and it returns a quick evaluation, a
strengths/weaknesses assessment across its evaluation points, improvement suggestions
("improve your idea"), and an optional ready-to-use business plan (a ~15–25 page document sold as a
one-time product). Its pitch is price: among the cheapest ways to get an AI take plus a plan. It's a
UI web app — no public API — and both the evaluation and the plan's financials are AI estimates,
not proof anyone will pay.
Step 1 — Gather context
If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated platform knowledge.
Ask only what you can't infer:
What do you want from RebeccAi?
A) Evaluate/assess an idea — the quick evaluation + strengths/weaknesses
B) Improve an idea with its refinement suggestions
C) Interpret a score / evaluation point it produced
D) Buy/understand the one-time business plan (what's in it, is it worth it)
E) Understand pricing — the free tier's daily-idea and character caps vs Premium
F) Get reports out / automate them (export / API reality)
What's the real question — "is this idea worth building?" or "how do I use this tool?" If it's the
go/no-go decision or a cross-market validator comparison, that's /sales-idea-validation (an AI
evaluation is not demand) — route in Step 2.
Skip-ahead: if the user wants the validate-before-building method or to rank validators across the
market, route to /sales-idea-validation immediately.
Step 2 — Route or answer directly
If the user's question is about…
Route to
The validate-before-building method, or the go/no-go decision itself
/sales-idea-validation {question}
Comparing RebeccAi against other validators (Validator AI, IdeaProof, Informly, DimeADozen…)
/sales-idea-validation {question}
Deep Reddit demand-signal discovery / scoring as its own workflow
/sales-trendseeker {question}
Building the smoke-test / fake-door landing page to test real demand
/sales-funnel {question}
Growing a pre-launch waitlist / capturing real demand
/sales-audience-growth {question}
Writing a fuller / lender-ready business plan as its own job
/sales-idea-validation {question} (routes to the plan-writing tools)
When routing, give the exact command: "This is a {domain} question — run: /sales-idea-validation {original question}"
Otherwise, answer RebeccAi-specific questions using Step 3.
Step 3 — RebeccAi platform reference
Read references/platform-guide.md for the full reference — the evaluation/assessment/improvement
modules and the evaluation-point inputs (personality, team size, budget), the one-time business-plan
product, the free/Premium/Business-Plan pricing and the free tier's daily-idea and character caps, the
no-public-API automation reality, and how it compares to the validator cluster.
Answer using only the relevant section — don't dump the full reference.
Step 4 — Actionable guidance
The evaluation is an AI opinion, not demand — keep the structure, discard the verdict. RebeccAi
reads one text box and returns a score plus strengths/weaknesses. Keep the useful structured parts
(the weaknesses it flags, the improvement suggestions, any competitor/positioning angle) to sharpen the
pitch, but take the go/no-go from a real behavior test (smoke test / pre-sale), routed to
/sales-idea-validation. A high evaluation is not a paying stranger.
Warn about the "feedback personality" toggle — it biases the result. Choosing a feedback tone
(e.g. "conservative & traditional") lets the founder bias scoring toward the answer they want, which
undermines objectivity. Tell the user to pick the most critical/skeptical setting available, or to
read the encouraging tones as marketing, not signal — a tool you can tune to flatter you can't
objectively validate you.
A generated business plan for an unvalidated idea is a document, not a strategy. The one-time plan
is cheap and fast, but building a 15–25 page plan (with financial projections) around an idea nobody
has tested is, as reviewers put it, a "fantasy" — the financials are AI estimates with no real market
input and can be invented. Use the plan as a first draft/structure; replace every number, and
validate demand before trusting the plan.
Present pricing as best-effort and plan-gated. Note the free tier is capped (a small
daily-idea limit and a short per-point character cap, no customization), that unlimited ideas + full
evaluation points + longer output + customizable answers are Premium-gated, and that the business
plan is a separate one-time purchase — flag all specifics as best-effort and point to
rebecc.ai/pricing, since a small tool's tiers change (Premium is also an intro-then-higher price).
There's no public API — don't plan an integration around it. If asked to export or automate, say
plainly there's no documented public API, no webhooks, no Zapier/Make, no MCP — it's a UI web app;
the only export is the business-plan document (edit/save/download) and manual copy. If you need the
signals scripted, pull them from source (a keyword-volume API, Google Trends, Reddit) instead. The
thing worth automating is a real demand signal, not an AI evaluation.
If you discover a gotcha or tip not in references/learnings.md, append it there with today's date.
Gotchas
Best-effort from research (2026-07) — RebeccAi is a small, solo-maker tool with no verified third-party
reviews (G2/Trustpilot/Capterra); verify pricing, the free-tier caps, plan contents, and evaluation
behavior at rebecc.ai.
An AI evaluation is not validated demand. The score/assessment is opinion, not proof anyone will
pay — follow it with a real-behavior test (smoke test / pre-sale). The go/no-go is a stranger taking an
action.
The "feedback personality" toggle biases the verdict. You can tune the tone toward what you want to
hear; that undermines objectivity. Pick the most skeptical setting and treat encouraging output as
marketing.
The business plan is a cheap document, not a strategy. A 15–25 page plan built on an untested idea
is a "fantasy"; its financial projections are AI estimates with no real market input — replace the
numbers and validate first.
Single text-box input, no structured questioning. Unlike gap-surfacing interrogators
(ReadySetLaunch) it's a one-shot format with no per-weakness follow-up — output quality tracks how
concretely you frame the customer + problem.
Free tier is capped and plan-gated. A small daily-idea limit + a short per-point character cap and
no customization on free; unlimited ideas, all evaluation points, longer output, and customizable
answers are Premium; the business plan is a separate one-time buy. Confirm current limits.
No verified third-party reviews. No G2/Trustpilot/Capterra footprint — treat social-proof and
accuracy claims as unverified.
No public API, no webhooks, no Zapier/Make/MCP. UI web app — you can't script or batch-export the
evaluations; only the business-plan document exports. Copy manually or pull signals from source.
Related skills
/sales-idea-validation — The tool-agnostic validate-before-building method + the full validator/business-plan landscape (use this to actually decide build-or-not; an AI evaluation is not demand)
/sales-ideaproof — IdeaProof platform help (a credit-based 120s validator that also bundles a plan/brand/logo/pitch/ads — a richer sibling to RebeccAi's cheap evaluate-plus-plan)
/sales-informly — Informly platform help (a per-report validator that returns a 75+ page PDF — another cheap validate-plus-report sibling)
/sales-readysetlaunch — ReadySetLaunch platform help (an interrogation-style validator that surfaces gaps instead of a flattering score — the antidote to RebeccAi's tunable feedback tone)
/sales-funnel — Build the smoke-test / fake-door landing page the real demand test runs on
/sales-audience-growth — Grow a pre-launch waitlist and capture real demand
/sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do -a claude-code
Examples
Example 1: "RebeccAi scored my idea highly — should I build it?"
User says: "I ran my idea through RebeccAi and it gave a strong evaluation. Good to go?"
Skill does: Reframes the evaluation as a directional AI opinion, not demand — and flags that the
feedback-personality toggle may have biased it toward encouragement. Keeps the structured parts (the
weaknesses it flagged, the improvement suggestions) to sharpen the pitch, then prescribes the real test:
a smoke-test landing page with a pre-committed conversion threshold, then a pre-sale to see who actually
pays — routing the build to /sales-funnel and the decision framework to /sales-idea-validation.
Result: The founder earns a go/no-go from stranger behavior instead of trusting a tunable score.
Example 2: "Is RebeccAi's $14.99 business plan worth buying?"
User says: "Should I buy the one-time business plan from RebeccAi?"
Skill does: Explains it's the cheapest way to get a 15–25 page plan, but that a plan built on an
untested idea is a document, not validation — its financial projections are AI estimates with no
real market input and can be invented. Advises using it as a first-draft structure (replace every
number and edit heavily), and validating demand before relying on it. Presents the price as best-effort
and points to rebecc.ai/pricing.
Result: The user buys (or skips) the plan with clear eyes and doesn't mistake a cheap document for a strategy.
Example 3: Can I export RebeccAi's evaluations via an API? (developer/automation)
User says: "I want to pull RebeccAi's evaluations into my own database via API."
Skill does: States plainly there's no documented public API, no webhooks, no Zapier/Make, no MCP
— it's a UI web app, so there's no supported way to export programmatically; only the business-plan
document exports (edit/save/download). Suggests the fallbacks: copy the evaluation you can see into your
own store (mind their terms), or pull the underlying signals from source (a keyword-volume API, Google
Trends, Reddit). Notes the thing worth automating is a real demand signal, not an AI evaluation.
Result: The user avoids building on a non-existent API and picks a workable path to the signal.
Troubleshooting
The evaluation feels flattering / it likes almost every idea
Symptom: RebeccAi's assessment reads encouraging and rarely says "don't build this."
Cause: The feedback-personality toggle lets you bias the tone toward what you want to hear, and
the evaluation is an AI opinion with no independent rubric — so it skews optimistic.
Solution: Pick the most critical/skeptical personality setting, read encouraging output as marketing,
keep only the weaknesses/improvements it surfaces, and put the go/no-go on a real demand test (smoke test
/ pre-sale) via /sales-idea-validation.
The business plan's financials look made up
Symptom: The generated plan's revenue/cost projections don't match reality.
Cause: The plan is generated from a short idea description with no real market data input — the
financials are AI estimates (reviewers report hallucinated figures).
Solution: Treat the plan as a first-draft structure, not a forecast — replace every number with your
own research, and validate demand before trusting it. For a fuller/lender-ready plan, see the
business-plan tools via /sales-idea-validation.
I want an API or a way to export/automate the evaluations
Symptom: Want to script RebeccAi or pull its evaluations/plans into another system.
Cause: RebeccAi has no documented public API, webhooks, or iPaaS connectors — it's a UI web app; only
the business-plan document exports.
Solution: Copy the visible evaluation into your own store (mind their terms), or pull the underlying
signals from source (a keyword-volume API, Google Trends, Reddit). Automate a real demand signal
(landing-page analytics) instead. See /sales-idea-validation.
