| name | parallel-workflow |
| description | Enforces the parallel subtask workflow using tracker issues, git worktrees, and PRs. Auto-triggers when working with git, branches, worktrees, PRs, tracker issues/tasks, codegen, or CI. |
| user-invocable | false |
Parallel Workflow Rules
Non-negotiable prerequisites
- The tracker issue is the source of truth. A tracker issue is REQUIRED before starting any work. NEVER start working without one — if there isn't one, create it first (see
writing-task-specs; task-tracker owns the tracker itself and its commands).
- ALWAYS work in a dedicated worktree. NEVER create branches or make changes in the main worktree. The main worktree must stay clean — the only permitted operation there advances the local
main ref (the fast-forward refresh the cleanup skill owns — see "Keep local main fresh" below). No branch work, no manual edits.
Scope: all three repos
This workflow applies to the whole workspace — sworld (frontend), sworld-backend (Hono), and sworld-hasura-v2 (Hasura) — not just the frontend. Same rules everywhere: tracker issue first, dedicated worktree, commit often / push immediately, self-review loop before PR, CI loop after. Repo-specific adjustments:
- Substitute the repo name in
gh commands. Every gh / GraphQL call is repo-scoped — fill in sworld, sworld-backend, or sworld-hasura-v2. Querying the wrong repo silently returns nothing. (The ci-loop gate queries carry the same rule.)
- Worktree setup step 7 (
.linear.toml) applies everywhere; step 8 is frontend-specific (.env copies into apps/<app>/, packages/core/.env, pnpm install). In a sibling repo, copy .linear.toml the same way, then follow that repo's own setup instead of step 8.
- Trust boundaries get the deep treatment. Hasura permissions/metadata and Hono Action/Event/webhook handlers are trust boundaries — in those repos the self-review loop (step 11) MUST also include the
security-reviewer skill.
- Hasura changes are not done when their PR is clean. A schema change ripples into the frontend: apply the migration locally, re-run
pnpm codegen in packages/core (it introspects the LOCAL Hasura), and land the regenerated types as a follow-up frontend PR — linked in the tracker with a blocking relation from the Hasura issue.
Git fundamentals
- "main branch" ALWAYS means
origin/main — fetch first with git fetch origin main. The local main is often stale.
- ALWAYS
git merge, NEVER git rebase. This applies everywhere — syncing, resolving divergence, integrating changes.
- Sync before analyzing, not just before coding. Before exploring or reasoning about code anywhere in this workspace (any of the three repos), check
git status and pull/fast-forward to origin/main first. Analyzing a stale checkout produces wrong conclusions and clarifying questions that contradict what's actually on main.
Keep local main fresh
Fetching only advances the origin/main ref — the local main branch pointer stays stale, so any lazy reference to local main (a code read, a diff, a new worktree base) is wrong. Because of the parallel-worktree workflow, local main is chronically behind — keep the pointer current in every repo whose main you are about to read off or branch from.
The refresh mechanic and every trigger for it are owned by the cleanup skill — see cleanup. Refresh a repo's main before you start new work in it or read off it.
Before starting
- Read the current tracker issue and confirm its
state (see task-tracker).
- Verify an issue exists for this work — a sub-issue under a feature's parent issue, or a standalone issue. If none exists, create it first (
writing-task-specs).
- Check the issue's blocking relations (see
task-tracker); resolve those blockers first.
- Analyse before you build, then start. For any non-trivial issue — especially a large-feature parent or a reworked/reopened one — run the
analyze skill on the ticket + its breakdown first: it re-derives requirements (via grill-me's completeness sweep) and checks the breakdown is still internally consistent (stale blockers, parent drift, deploy-order encoded as real relations) before a line of code. Reconcile what it flags as fixable; raise anything that changes scope with the owner. Let its verdict gate the advance: if analyze concludes the breakdown needs the owner to resolve blocking findings first, stop at raising them — don't start building against a breakdown they haven't signed off (non-gating still holds — you surface and offer, you just don't unilaterally build past an unresolved blocker). Once analyze's verdict is safe-to-build — as-is or after the reconciling edits — or the owner says go, start the issue in the tracker (see task-tracker) before touching code. Skip the whole pass only for a trivial single-issue change with nothing to audit.
Creating a worktree
git fetch origin main first, then create worktree inside .claude/worktrees/ from origin/main.- Create the worktree under
.claude/worktrees/ — self-contained, gitignored, and aligned with Claude Code's official default — named for the issue per task-tracker's branch convention.
- Copy
.linear.toml from the repo root into the worktree root. It is gitignored (it can hold a plaintext API key), so a fresh worktree starts without it — and the linear CLI's config lookup stops at the checkout root, never walking up to the main worktree. Without it every tracker command silently resolves to the account's default workspace, which is not sworld: reads return the wrong workspace's data, and writes fail with Team not found: SWO. Applies to all three repos.
- Copy
.env files from the main worktree into the matching apps/<app>/ directories. Also copy packages/core/.env — pnpm codegen reads HASURA_GRAPHQL_URL / HASURA_ADMIN_SECRET from it; without it codegen aborts with Unable to find any GraphQL type definitions ... - undefined. Then run pnpm install in the worktree.
During work
Once a breakdown or plan is approved, work through it without pausing to reconfirm each step: don't ask "want me to start the next one?" between already-planned sub-issues/PRs — proceed automatically when one finishes and the next is unblocked, reporting progress as you go. Only stop to ask when there's a genuine decision the plan didn't settle: a real fork, a destructive/irreversible action, or new ambiguity.
- The 3 files limit is soft — more is fine if changes are small, cohesive, and easy to review.
- NEVER bypass commit hooks — code MUST be formatted, linted, and type-checked.
- Self-review before creating the PR — run the
self-review skill and follow it to a clean exit. It gates PR creation, not pushing (see step 14).
- Always verify
git branch --show-current before committing.
- Don't dismiss automated review findings without thorough verification.
- Commit often and push immediately — never ask, just do it. Pushing is backup, not publication: a pushed branch with no PR is invisible, and it means a broken laptop loses zero work. Pushing is NEVER gated; only PR creation is (step 11).
Codegen
- ALWAYS
git fetch origin main && git merge origin/main before running codegen.
- Run
pnpm codegen in packages/core to regenerate GraphQL types. Needs packages/core/.env in the worktree (see step 8) — codegen introspects the live Hasura schema using the URL/secret from it.
- See
architecture skill for GraphQL conventions (generated files, graphql() usage).
Resolving conflicts
- ALWAYS fetch the latest main first:
git fetch origin main && git merge origin/main. ALWAYS.
- NEVER rebase. ALWAYS merge.
- If conflicts are in codegen-generated files, take the changes from main and re-run
pnpm codegen in packages/core.
PR submission
- A PR may ONLY be created after the self-review loop (step 11) has exited clean. Pushing commits needs no gate; creating the PR does.
- Create PR with
[WIP] prefix (not draft).
- Reference the tracker issue in the PR description (see
task-tracker).
- ALWAYS assign PR to the user (
--assignee "@me").
- Ensure PR is independent and mergeable without other PRs.
- Run the
ci-loop skill after pushing.
CI loop ("do the loop")
Once the PR is up, hand off to the ci-loop skill to drive it to settled. See ci-loop.
Issue state management
An issue's status changes at exactly three moments — you start it, it's ready for review, it's done. Those moments are the workflow's; what each one requires — a manual step or nothing at all — is the tracker's. At every moment, do what task-tracker says. Starting a large-feature parent (even just to plan it) is a "start" moment too.
Good PR criteria
- Clear goal, scope, and impact (before vs after).
- Clear steps to test.
- Constants-only PRs are safe to merge.
- Props drilling can touch many files but few lines — still a good PR.
- Renaming/refactoring across files is easy to review.
