en un clic
discuss
Discuss and explore ideas before committing to an approach
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Menu
Discuss and explore ideas before committing to an approach
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Autonomous product factory — /make-a-goal in godmode. Point it at a north-star outcome and it runs the whole delivery machine unattended: brainstorm the feature landscape (Discover), put every idea through a Feasibility Court, cluster into a Roadmap of epics, then per epic Plan → adversarial review → Execute (model-paired build) → VERIFY (drive the real UI/TUI/API, not mocks) → ship a stacked PR, looping until the backlog is dry or a budget/time bound fires. One human gate (roadmap blessing), hard stop rules, always-on tabbed RAG dashboard, crash-proof resume from state files. Use when the user says 'godmode', 'run the factory', 'ship X to nirvana', 'execute this whole backlog autonomously', 'goals within goals', or wants a multi-epic programme driven end-to-end with real end-to-end verification. NOT for single features, one-off verification, or scoped builds — use /make-a-goal, browser/tmux verification skills, or a plain plan for those.
Sync user-level agent config changes back to the ainb-toolkit repo (works for Claude, Codex, Copilot)
Produce a self-contained, richly styled HTML explainer for any topic the user asks about. Picks the right template from a bundled set of 22 visual patterns (feature explainer, concept explainer, module map, PR review, ADR, options paper / trade-off analysis, system diagram, flow- chart, status report, slide deck, prototype, editor, etc.), fills it with real content, augments with inline diagrams via sister skills (/fireworks-tech-graph for architecture / flow / sequence diagrams, /graphify for knowledge graphs), applies a Claude-brand polish layer, and publishes it: by default onto the configured here.now custom domain (path mount + searchable categorised index + password lock per the config's protect rule, driven by ~/.herenow/explainers.json), or a plain here.now URL, or a GitHub gist (--gist / --gist --public). Local-only output is available with --local. Use when Stevie says "/explain-to-me", "explain-to-me X", "make me an explainer for X", "give me an HTML explainer", "render this as a webpage", "ADR for
Self-improvement through conversation analysis. Extracts learnings from corrections and success patterns, permanently encoding them into agent definitions. Philosophy - Correct once, never again.
Claude Code observability skill: analyze session traces stored in Langfuse, extract learnings from corrections, identify success patterns, and propose agent/skill improvements based on historical data. Powers self-improvement through trace analysis of Claude Code sessions.
Create well-formatted git commits for changes made during the session
| name | discuss |
| description | Discuss and explore ideas before committing to an approach |
| user-invocable | true |
Capture implementation decisions BEFORE planning. Produces a CONTEXT.md with locked decisions that /plan must honor.
/plan when the phase has ambiguities.planning/ROADMAP.md.planning/ROADMAP.md to identify the target phase.planning/STATE.md for current positionBased on what the phase is building, identify 3-4 ambiguities:
| Domain | Typical Gray Areas |
|---|---|
| UI/Frontend | Layout approach, interaction patterns, responsive behavior, state management |
| API/Backend | Response formats, error handling, auth strategy, data validation |
| Data/Storage | Schema design, migration approach, indexing strategy |
| Infrastructure | Deployment target, scaling approach, monitoring |
Present them:
Phase [N]: [Name]
I've identified these areas that need decisions before planning:
1. **[Area 1]**: [Why this is ambiguous]
2. **[Area 2]**: [Why this is ambiguous]
3. **[Area 3]**: [Why this is ambiguous]
Which areas would you like to discuss? (or "all")
For each selected area, ask 3-4 probing questions using AskUserQuestion:
Write to .planning/phases/{phase}/CONTEXT.md:
# Phase [N] Context: [Phase Name]
## Scope (from Roadmap)
[Copy from ROADMAP.md]
## Implementation Decisions
### [Area 1]
- **Decision**: [Concrete choice]
- **Rationale**: [Why this choice]
- **Trade-off**: [What we're giving up]
### [Area 2]
...
## Deferred Ideas
- [Idea mentioned but deferred to later phase]
---
*Locked on [date]. /plan must honor these decisions.*
Update .planning/STATE.md to record that discussion is complete for this phase.
If no .planning/ directory exists, /discuss still works:
plans/discuss_[topic]_[date].md instead