long-task-st

name	long-task-st
description	Use when all features in feature-list.json are passing - run comprehensive system testing before release, aligned with IEEE 829 and ISTQB best practices

System Testing — Cross-Feature & System-Wide Verification Before Release

Run cross-feature and system-wide testing after all features are implemented and passing. Per-feature ST test cases (functional, boundary, UI, security) have already been executed during each Worker cycle via long-task-feature-st. This phase focuses on what per-feature testing cannot cover: cross-feature interactions, multi-feature E2E workflows, system-wide NFR verification, compatibility, and exploratory testing.

Announce at start: "I'm using the long-task-st skill. All features are passing — time for cross-feature system testing."

Core principle: Per-feature ST test cases prove individual features meet their requirements. System testing proves the whole works together across feature boundaries.

Do NOT skip any applicable test category. A "Go" verdict requires evidence from EVERY category that applies to this project. "It probably works" is not evidence. Manual test escalation: When any test scenario in Steps 3-8 cannot be automated (requires physical device, human visual judgment, or external human action), use `AskUserQuestion` to present the test to the human and collect their verdict.

Format:

Manual Verification Required: {test description}
Category: {ST step — e.g., Integration, E2E, NFR, Compatibility}
What to verify: {specific check with acceptance criteria}
Expected result: {threshold or criterion from SRS}

Please report: PASS or FAIL on first line, then what you observed.
To skip: respond SKIP {reason}

• Parse response: first line PASS/FAIL/SKIP. If unparseable, re-prompt once; then record as BLOCKED.
• Record results as MANUAL-PASS or MANUAL-FAIL in the ST report.
• MANUAL-FAIL has the same severity implications as automated failure — it blocks Go verdict for Critical/Major items.
• SKIP {reason} records as BLOCKED with the reason (not silently skipped).

Checklist

You MUST create a TodoWrite task for each step and complete them in order:

1. ST Readiness Gate

python scripts/check_st_readiness.py feature-list.json

• All features have "status": "passing" — if any failing, invoke long-task:long-task-work instead
• SRS document exists (docs/plans/*-srs.md); Design document exists (docs/plans/*-design.md)
• Load config values if applicable — activate environment per long-task-guide.md; if the project uses a file-based config, ensure it is sourced before running the checks
• Start ST runtime services: Start services using commands from env-guide.md (skip if CLI/library only)
  • Read env-guide.md — use "Start All Services" section; run each command with output redirect:

    [start command] > /tmp/svc-<slug>-start.log 2>&1 &
    sleep 3
    head -30 /tmp/svc-<slug>-start.log
    

  • Extract PID and port from the first 30 lines
  • Run "Verify Services Running" health checks from env-guide.md — must respond before proceeding
  • If start fails: check the log, diagnose root cause; try corrected commands (port conflict, env vars, missing deps); once a working command is confirmed update env-guide.md (Services table + Start command); if the fix needs >2 steps, extract to scripts/svc-<slug>-start.sh and reference from env-guide.md
  • Record info: PIDs and ports in task-progress.md — required for Step 11 cleanup
• Read feature-list.json — note tech_stack, quality_gates, constraints[], assumptions[]
• Read SRS — extract all FR-xxx, NFR-xxx, IFR-xxx, CON-xxx requirements; read Stakeholders, User Personas, and Glossary sections
• Read Design doc — extract architecture, API design, testing strategy (§9), third-party dependencies (§8)
• If UI features exist: read UCD doc (docs/plans/*-ucd.md)
• Read task-progress.md — session history context

2. ST Plan

Create docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-st-plan.md with:

2a. Test Scope

Category	Applies When	Skip When
Regression	Always	Never
Integration	2+ features with shared data/state/APIs	Single isolated feature
E2E Scenarios	SRS has multi-step user workflows	Pure library/utility projects
Performance	SRS has NFR-xxx with response time / throughput targets	No performance NFRs
Security	Security NFRs OR project handles user input / auth / external data	Isolated offline tools
Compatibility	SRS specifies platform / browser / runtime targets	Single-platform CLI tools
Exploratory	Always	Never

2b. Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)

Map EVERY SRS requirement to ST test approach. Reference per-feature test case documents from Worker Step 9:

| Req ID | Requirement | Feature ST Status | System ST Category | ATS Categories | Test Approach | Priority |
|--------|-------------|-------------------|--------------------|----------------|---------------|----------|
| FR-001 | ... | docs/test-cases/feature-1-xxx.md (PASS) | E2E | FUNC,BNDRY,SEC | Scenario: ... | High |
| NFR-001 | ... | docs/test-cases/feature-5-xxx.md (PASS) | Performance | PERF | Load test: ... | Critical |
| IFR-001 | ... | N/A (cross-feature) | Integration | FUNC,BNDRY | Contract test: ... | High |

Every FR-xxx, NFR-xxx, IFR-xxx must appear in the RTM. Requirements without a test approach = gap.

If any requirements require manual verification (from ATS 自动化可行性 column or Feature-ST manual cases), include a Manual column in the RTM:

| Req ID | ... | Manual | Test Approach | Priority |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------|----------|
| FR-010 | ... | Yes: visual-judgment | Manual visual verification via AskUserQuestion | High |

ATS compliance gate (if ATS document exists):

python scripts/check_ats_coverage.py docs/plans/*-ats.md --feature-list feature-list.json --strict

Must exit 0. Any ATS category gap = finding to resolve before proceeding.

2c. Entry / Exit Criteria

Entry (must ALL be true): all features passing, environment provisioned, all required configs present.

Exit (must ALL be true for Go verdict): all regression/integration/E2E tests pass, all NFR thresholds met with measured evidence, no Critical or Major defects open, RTM shows 100% requirement coverage, ATS category compliance verified (if ATS exists: check_ats_coverage.py --strict exits 0).

2d. Risk-Based Prioritization

1. Critical path — core user workflows, highest business impact
2. Integration boundaries — cross-feature data flows, API contracts
3. NFR thresholds — performance, security (highest technical risk)
4. Edge cases — boundary conditions, error recovery
5. Compatibility — platform/browser variations

3. Regression Testing

1. Run full project test suite using commands from long-task-guide.md

2. Verify ALL tests pass — zero failures, zero errors

3. Verify line and branch coverage thresholds met project-wide

4. Check for new warnings, deprecation notices, dependency conflicts

5. Any failure → STOP — this is a regression. Diagnose before proceeding.

Record: total tests, passed/failed, line/branch coverage vs thresholds.

3b. Full Mutation Regression

Run full-codebase mutation testing. Per-feature mutation during Worker cycles may have only scoped feature tests (when active features > mutation_full_threshold); this step verifies mutation score holds project-wide with the full test suite.

1. Get the mutation_full command from long-task-guide.md
2. Run full mutation testing (all source files, all tests)
3. Verify: mutation score >= quality_gates.mutation_score_min from feature-list.json
4. If surviving mutants found:
   • Analyze: equivalent mutant (document + skip) vs real gap (add test → Major severity defect)
   • If score below threshold → treat as regression defect (Major severity)
5. Record: mutation score, killed/survived/total, command used

See references/st-recipes.md section "Full Mutation Regression" for per-tool commands and result interpretation.

Record: mutation score vs threshold, surviving mutant count, tool output summary.

4. Integration Testing

Test cross-feature interactions. Read references/st-recipes.md for language-specific patterns and real-vs-contract test classification.

Terminology (see st-recipes.md §1 for details):

• Contract test = mock-based, verifies call signatures — supplementary, not sufficient
• Integration test = real-service, verifies actual data flow — required per boundary

Every internal cross-feature boundary MUST have at least one real integration test (real DB, real HTTP, real file system). Contract tests (mocks) do NOT satisfy this gate.

For external third-party boundaries: if test credentials are available in required_configs or environment, write real integration tests. Otherwise, use contract tests and record the reason in the Mock Authorization column.

For each pair of features sharing data, state, or API boundaries:

• Data flow: Feature A produces data → Feature B consumes it → verify data integrity end-to-end; shared DB/state consistency
• API contracts: internal API calls between modules — verify request/response schemas; error propagation; version compatibility
• Dependency chains: walk dependencies[] graph in feature-list.json; verify features work in dependency order; test each dependency edge

Classification table (include in ST plan):

Boundary	Features	Type	Real Tests	Contract Tests	Mock Authorization	Status
shared DB	F1 → F3	Internal	2	1	N/A	PASS
REST API	F2 → F4	Internal	1	0	N/A	PASS
GitHub API	F5 → ext	External	1	0	N/A (user provided token)	PASS
Stripe API	F7 → ext	External	0	2	User confirmed no sandbox	PASS

Minimum per internal boundary:

• ≥1 real test that writes/reads through the real shared resource
• If real service cannot start: boundary is BLOCKED (not skipped) — diagnose via env-guide.md

External boundary protocol:

1. Check required_configs and environment for test credentials/sandbox environment
2. If available → write real integration tests (preferred)
3. If unavailable → use contract tests; record reason in Mock Authorization column

Write integration tests in tests/integration/ or tests/st/. Tag each test:

# Integration: Feature A → Feature B (shared DB) [Real]
def test_feature_a_data_consumed_by_feature_b():
    ...

# Contract: Feature C → External API [Contract]
def test_external_api_response_shape():
    ...

Run and record results per boundary.

4b. Full-Pipeline Smoke Test

Before E2E scenario testing, verify at least one complete data flow path through the entire system. This catches integration bugs that per-boundary tests miss.

At least ONE smoke test must exercise a real end-to-end data path (input → processing → storage → retrieval → output) using only real services. No mocks.

1. Identify the critical path — the single most important data flow through the system (e.g., "create entity → store → query → return")
2. Write one smoke test that:
   • Starts from external input (API call, CLI command, UI action)
   • Passes through all intermediate processing
   • Persists to real storage (if applicable)
   • Retrieves and verifies the persisted result
   • Uses ONLY real services — no mocks
3. Run the smoke test against running services (started in Step 1)
4. If it fails → Critical severity defect — diagnose before proceeding to E2E

Scaling:

Project Size	Smoke Tests
Tiny (1-5 features)	1 critical path
Small (5-15)	1-2 critical paths
Medium (15-50)	2-3 critical paths
Large (50+)	3-5 critical paths covering major subsystems

Record: smoke test description, real services used, pass/fail, execution evidence.

5. Cross-Feature E2E Scenario Testing

Test complete user workflows that span multiple features from SRS acceptance criteria. Single-feature scenarios are already covered by per-feature ST test cases.

For each user persona in SRS Stakeholders:

• Extract primary workflows that cross feature boundaries
• Create E2E scenarios spanning multiple features (happy path + error recovery)
• For each scenario: set up initial state → execute workflow → verify intermediate AND final states → clean up

For each scenario: set up initial state, execute step-by-step, verify intermediate states AND final outcome, clean up.

UI E2E Testing (only if "ui": true features exist): Use Chrome DevTools MCP for browser-based E2E verification.

Write E2E tests in tests/e2e/ or tests/st/. Run and record results.

6. System-Wide NFR Verification

Per-feature NFR checks were handled in feature-level ST. This step focuses on system-wide aggregate NFR measurement. For each NFR-xxx in SRS, verify with measured evidence — not estimates.

• Performance: measure p50/p95/p99 under expected load; throughput; memory/CPU/disk I/O. See references/st-recipes.md for benchmarking tools. Record: measured value vs SRS threshold.
• Security: input validation audit (SQL, XSS, command injection, path traversal); auth/session/privilege escalation; dependency vulnerability scan (npm audit, pip-audit, etc.); OWASP Top 10 checklist; secrets in code/logs. Record: per-check PASS/FAIL with evidence.
• Scalability (if load targets in SRS): run load tests at 1x, 2x, 5x expected load; measure degradation curve; identify bottlenecks.
• Reliability: error handling produces meaningful messages; graceful degradation when dependencies unavailable; no data corruption under error conditions.

7. Compatibility Testing

Skip if SRS does not specify platform/browser/runtime targets.

• Cross-browser (UI only): run E2E scenarios in each target browser; verify visual consistency via screenshots; check browser-specific console errors
• Cross-platform: build/install/run full test suite on each target OS; verify platform-specific behavior (file paths, line endings, permissions)
• Runtime versions: run full test suite for each target runtime version; verify no version-specific API issues

Record: per-platform/browser PASS/FAIL matrix.

8. Exploratory Testing

Charter-based, time-boxed sessions to find issues that scripted tests miss.

Create one charter per major feature area:

Charter: Explore [feature area]
         with [technique: stress/edge/abuse/workflow variation]
         to discover [bugs/usability issues/undocumented behavior]

For each charter: time-box 15-30 minutes; follow intuition — try unexpected inputs, unusual sequences, rapid interactions; log observations in real-time (Bug / Question / Note with severity).

If an exploratory charter identifies issues requiring physical device access or human visual judgment beyond what Chrome DevTools MCP can verify: use AskUserQuestion to collect the tester's findings with the charter context.

After all charters: consolidate findings; cross-reference with RTM for requirement gaps; add new defects to triage queue.

9. Defect Triage

If ANY defects were found in Steps 3-8:

Severity	Definition	Action
Critical	System crash, data loss, security breach	BLOCK release — fix immediately
Major	Core workflow broken, NFR threshold failed	BLOCK release — fix before release
Minor	Non-core affected, workaround exists	Document — fix now or defer (decide with user)
Cosmetic	Visual/text issue, no functional impact	Document — defer to next release

Escape analysis — for each defect, classify where it should have been caught:

Escaped From	Meaning	Systemic Action
Unit	TDD should have caught this	Add unit test; review coverage for similar gaps
Feature-ST	Per-feature acceptance testing gap	Add test case via increment skill
Mock-Leaked	Mock test passed but real integration fails	Replace mock with real integration test
Integration	Cross-feature boundary not tested	Add integration test for boundary
Spec	Requirement ambiguous or missing	Clarify SRS via increment skill

Include the "Escaped From" column in the defect table:

#	Severity	Escaped From	Category	Description	Status	Fix Ref

Fix loop (if Critical/Major defects exist):

1. Mark affected features "status": "failing" in feature-list.json; document in task-progress.md
2. Invoke long-task:long-task-work to fix
3. After fixes: re-run affected ST test categories (not full ST)
4. Return to triage — repeat until no Critical/Major remain

For Minor/Cosmetic deferrals: document in ST report with severity, description, workaround.

10. ST Report

Before writing, verify: every SRS requirement appears in RTM; every NFR has a measured value meeting the threshold; every applicable category has results; all defects are classified.

Generate docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-st-report.md with these sections:

1. Executive Summary — 1-3 sentences: overall quality assessment and release recommendation
2. Requirements Traceability Matrix — full RTM table with Feature ST status, System ST category, ATS categories, result, evidence; coverage count (X/Y requirements, Z%); list any gaps; include ATS compliance check result (check_ats_coverage.py --strict output)
3. Test Execution Summary — table: category, tests run, passed, failed, skipped, notes (one row per category from Step 2a); include a final row Real Test Cases — aggregate Real test case counts (total / passed / failed) from all feature ST documents (docs/test-cases/feature-*.md Real Test Case Execution Summary tables); if any manual test cases exist, include a Manual Test Cases row — aggregate manual test case counts (total / MANUAL-PASS / MANUAL-FAIL / BLOCKED) from all Feature-ST documents and System-ST execution steps
4. Defect Summary — table: severity, escaped from, category, description, status (fixed/deferred), fix reference; totals; open Critical/Major count (must be 0 for Go); if ≥2 defects share the same "Escaped From" source, flag as systemic gap in Risk Assessment
5. Quality Metrics — line/branch coverage vs thresholds, full mutation score vs threshold (from Step 3b), total test count; real test cases: total / passed / failed (aggregated from all docs/test-cases/feature-*.md Real Test Case Execution Summary tables)
6. Risk Assessment — residual risks with likelihood, impact, mitigation
7. Recommendations — post-release monitoring, known limitations, suggested improvements

11. Persist

• Git commit ST artifacts (docs/plans/*-st-plan.md, docs/plans/*-st-report.md, test files)
• Validate: python scripts/validate_features.py feature-list.json
• Cleanup (MANDATORY): Stop services started in Step 1
  • Read env-guide.md "Stop All Services" section — kill by PID (from task-progress.md, preferred) or by port (fallback)
  • If the stop command fails: try port-based fallback; once a working command is confirmed, update env-guide.md Stop command; if >2 steps are needed, extract to scripts/svc-<slug>-stop.sh and reference from env-guide.md
  • Run env-guide.md "Verify Services Stopped" commands — ports must not respond
  • Record cleanup result: Note cleanup status in task-progress.md

12.5 Retrospective Report (Conditional)

python scripts/check_retrospective_readiness.py

If exit 0 (records found) AND retro_authorized is true in feature-list.json:

• Invoke long-task:long-task-retrospective
• Wait for completion before proceeding to Verdict

If exit 1 (no records) OR retro_authorized is absent/false → skip to Verdict.

12. Verdict

Determine the Go/No-Go verdict based on exit criteria. Record in the ST report:

• Go: All exit criteria met, no open Critical/Major defects, RTM 100% covered
• Conditional-Go: Minor/Cosmetic defects deferred, all critical paths verified
• No-Go: Open Critical/Major defects, NFR thresholds not met, or RTM gaps

MANUAL-FAIL results are treated identically to automated FAIL for verdict determination. A Critical/Major defect discovered via manual testing blocks Go verdict, same as automated.

13. Finalize (on Go/Conditional-Go)

If verdict is Go or Conditional-Go:

• Invoke long-task:long-task-finalize
• Wait for completion before ending session

If No-Go → skip (loop back to Worker for fixes; Finalize runs after eventual Go).

Scaling ST to Project Size

Project Size	Features	ST Depth
Tiny (1-5)	1-5 features	Regression + lightweight integration + 1 smoke test + 2-3 E2E scenarios + 1-2 exploratory charters
Small (5-15)	5-15 features	Full regression + integration per shared boundary + 1-2 smoke tests + E2E per persona + NFR spot-checks + 3-5 charters
Medium (15-50)	15-50 features	Full regression + systematic integration + 2-3 smoke tests + comprehensive E2E + full NFR + compatibility matrix + 5-10 charters
Large (50+)	50+ features	Full regression + integration test suite + 3-5 smoke tests + E2E automation + full NFR load testing + full compatibility + security audit + 10+ charters

Critical Rules

• Readiness gate first — never start ST with failing features
• Evidence-based verdicts — every PASS must have measured evidence; "it looks OK" is not evidence
• RTM completeness — every SRS requirement must appear in the RTM; gaps are findings
• NFR thresholds are hard gates — measured value must meet SRS threshold, not "close enough"
• Defect severity is non-negotiable — Critical/Major defects block release; no exceptions
• ALL bugs must be fixed — Any bug found in ST testing (frontend, backend, integration) MUST be fixed before release. There is no "not my code" exemption.
• Re-test after fix — never assume a fix works; re-run affected test categories
• Real test cases must pass — any failed Real test case in the ST report's Real Test Cases row is an unresolved defect that blocks a Go verdict
• Exploratory testing is mandatory — scripted tests cannot find everything
• ST report before verdict — document first, then decide; never skip the report
• No new features during ST — ST tests the integrated system as-is
• ATS categories are binding — if ATS exists, check_ats_coverage.py --strict must exit 0; every required category must have test coverage
• Real integration tests required per boundary — internal boundaries need ≥1 real test; external boundaries should use real credentials when available; contract tests with documented reason when unavailable
• Full-pipeline smoke test mandatory — at least one real end-to-end data path must be verified before E2E scenarios
• Defect escape analysis required — every defect must be classified by "Escaped From" source to identify systemic testing gaps

Integration

Called by: using-long-task (when feature-list.json exists AND all features passing), or long-task-work (Step 12 when no failing features remain) Reads: feature-list.json, docs/plans/*-srs.md, docs/plans/*-design.md, docs/plans/*-ucd.md (if UI), docs/test-cases/feature-*.md (per-feature ST from long-task-feature-st), task-progress.md, project config file (if applicable) May invoke: long-task:long-task-work (if Critical/Major defects found → fix loop), long-task:long-task-finalize (after Go/Conditional-Go verdict) Produces: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-st-plan.md, docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-st-report.md Read on-demand (via Read tool, NOT Skill tool): references/st-recipes.md