Skip to main content
Exécutez n'importe quel Skill dans Manus
en un clic
TGPSKI
Profil créateur GitHub

TGPSKI

Vue par dépôt de 30 skills collectés dans 9 dépôts GitHub.

skills collectés
30
dépôts
9
mis à jour
2026-07-22
carte des dépôts

Où se trouvent les skills

Principaux dépôts par nombre de skills collectés, avec leur part dans ce catalogue créateur et leur couverture métier.

Les 8 principaux dépôts sont affichés ici ; la liste complète continue ci-dessous.
explorateur de dépôts

Dépôts et skills représentatifs

go-release
Développeurs de logiciels

Manage the full Go module release lifecycle: determine next semver version, update CHANGELOG.md, create and push a git tag, and verify pkg.go.dev picks up the new version. Use when the user asks to tag a release, bump the version, update the changelog, or publish a new module version.

2026-04-10
cli-flag-review
Analystes en assurance qualité des logiciels et testeurs

Audit and optimize CLI flag definitions across all skeptic subcommands. Reviews help text quality, global-vs-local flag modeling, short flag coverage, shorthand config-precedence safety, help formatter consistency, and test isolation. Use when adding flags, reviewing CLI ergonomics, refactoring subcommand interfaces, or debugging flag override behavior.

2026-04-09
doc-accuracy-audit
Développeurs de logiciels

Audit a document against the codebase for accuracy, then tighten it: verify claims, cut drift, simplify, restructure for the reader. Use when the user says a doc is loose, stale, or wrong, or asks to tighten/audit a README, guide, config reference, or any prose that makes claims about code.

2026-04-09
documentation-lifecycle
Développeurs de logiciels

Generate, update, and maintain per-module documentation under docs/modules/, keep ARCHITECTURE.md and README.md current, and produce Mermaid diagrams for data-flow, block, and dependency views. Use when the user asks to document a package, update architecture docs, generate diagrams, or audit documentation freshness.

2026-04-09
ruleset-lifecycle-operations
Développeurs de logiciels

Add or update rule definitions, create and manage rule groups, and migrate rules across groups in skeptic using the property-based layout. Use when the user asks to add/update rules, add/manage groups, or reorganize `internal/rules`.

2026-04-09
threat-rules-ingestion
Analystes en sécurité de l'information

Ingest fresh security research from URLs/files, generate signed scanner rule packs, and validate with policy and behavior scan styles across ecosystems. Use when the user asks to operationalize new threat intel into skeptic detections.

2026-04-09
workflow-action-updates
Développeurs de logiciels

Audit and update GitHub Actions workflow files to use the latest action releases pinned to full commit SHAs. Scans all .github/workflows/*.yml files, resolves current vs latest versions, and applies upgrades. Use when the user asks to update actions, check for outdated workflow dependencies, pin actions to SHAs, or audit CI workflow hygiene.

2026-04-09
release-prep
Développeurs de logiciels

Prepare a leather release: auto-detect next version from git history, insert CHANGELOG section, update docs, commit and push. USE FOR: cutting a new release; bumping version after feature or fix work. DO NOT USE FOR: tagging the release (use release-tag after this skill completes).

2026-07-05
agents-doc-lifecycle
Développeurs de logiciels

Manage AGENTS.md and .subagents/*.md across the leather subagent guide set (currently 17 guides spanning core, runtime, worker, serve, tannery, quality, performance, security, operations, shell-mcp, ui, replay, agent-definition, tools/skills/toolsets semantics, integrations, examples, and observability). USE FOR: auditing every guide against the codebase; adding routing-table rows for new packages or features; splitting an overloaded guide; merging thin guides; updating flag/type/subcommand tables; validating cross-references and ownership uniqueness; enforcing the per-guide `last reviewed` footer; running the full ownership/footer/cross-ref health check. DO NOT USE FOR: writing implementation code; debugging runtime errors; running tests.

2026-07-05
documentation-lifecycle
Développeurs de logiciels

Generate, update, and maintain per-module documentation under docs/modules/, keep docs/ARCHITECTURE.md and README.md current, and produce Mermaid diagrams for data-flow, block, and dependency views. USE FOR: documenting a package; updating architecture docs after structural changes; generating diagrams; auditing documentation freshness; first-time doc generation for the project. DO NOT USE FOR: writing implementation code; debugging runtime errors; updating AGENTS.md or .subagents/ guides (use agents-doc-lifecycle instead).

2026-07-05
release-tag
Développeurs de logiciels

Tag a prepared leather release and push the tag to origin. Triggers the automated release pipeline. USE FOR: after release-prep has committed and pushed. DO NOT USE FOR: preparing the CHANGELOG or docs (use release-prep first); creating GitHub releases directly (the pipeline handles that).

2026-06-05
code-quality-lifecycle
Analystes en assurance qualité des logiciels et testeurs

Audit and improve test coverage, formatting, linting, and test organization for the leather codebase. USE FOR: finding untested exported functions; identifying test files that should be split; checking and fixing gofmt/golangci-lint issues; producing a coverage gap report; catching benchmark regressions; full quality gate pre-PR. DO NOT USE FOR: writing business logic; documentation (use documentation-lifecycle); agents doc sync (use agents-doc-lifecycle).

2026-06-01
abductive-triage
Développeurs de logiciels

Structured diagnostic reasoning for AI agents investigating incidents, failures, and unexpected behavior. Teaches agents to resolve coordinate mismatches first (majority of incidents), then build timelines, generate competing hypotheses, identify discriminating evidence, and produce portable investigation artifacts. Use when asked to create a triage workflow, investigate an incident, debug a failure, or encode a diagnostic process.

2026-06-11
hidden-pipeline-race-investigate
Analystes en assurance qualité des logiciels et testeurs

Investigate a system that appears to work but silently fails under specific conditions. Demonstrates Tier 2 investigation with the 'no hypotheses survive' recovery pattern and hidden mechanism discovery.

2026-06-11
supply-chain-ioc-investigate
Analystes en sécurité de l'information

Investigate potential supply chain compromise indicators. Demonstrates Tier 2 investigation with multi-finding triage, timeline construction across systems, and evidence hierarchy in practice.

2026-06-11
vault-path-confusion-investigate
Administrateurs de réseaux et de systèmes informatiques

Investigate reported secret mismatches between a cluster and a secret store. Demonstrates Tier 1 resolution — coordinate mismatch identified and resolved without deep analysis.

2026-06-11
your-investigation-name
Administrateurs de réseaux et de systèmes informatiques

Multi-phase investigation for {problem class}. Routes to the appropriate phase based on artifact state. Phase 1 resolves coordinate mismatches (majority of incidents). Phase 2 investigates systemic issues. Phase 3 remediates and documents.

2026-06-11
fips-crypto-audit
Analystes en sécurité de l'information

Runs a FIPS 140-3 crypto compliance audit across Go repositories, classifying every crypto/ import by risk and generating per-component reports. Separates first-party code from vendored dependencies and flags non-cryptographic uses of crypto primitives that break under GODEBUG=fips140=only. Use when auditing Go services for FIPS compliance, assessing new repos before adding them to FIPS CI, re-running an audit after vendor bumps, or generating evidence for compliance documentation.

2026-07-22
fips-finding-triage
Analystes en sécurité de l'information

Classifies an individual FIPS crypto audit finding as real cryptography or a non-cryptographic use of a crypto primitive, using structured diagnostic reasoning. Follows the abductive triage methodology of resolving coordinate mismatches first, since most findings are non-crypto, then tracing data flow and protocol requirements only when a usage is genuinely ambiguous. Use when an audit surfaces a CRITICAL or WARNING finding that needs classification, when a vendored dependency's crypto usage may not ship in the binary, or when producing evidence for a compliance review.

2026-07-22
fips-remediation-plan
Analystes en sécurité de l'information

Generates component-specific FIPS remediation TODO lists from crypto audit results, with effort estimates and suggested PR sequencing. A directed workflow following the Inspect-Decide-Generate pattern, splitting findings into must-fix, primitive swaps, no-change-needed, and upstream dependencies. Use after a FIPS crypto audit when a component team asks what they need to fix, when planning sprint work for a FIPS migration, or when writing remediation PR descriptions.

2026-07-22
9 dépôts affichés sur 9
Tous les dépôts sont affichés