serene-bliss

name	serene-bliss
description	Use when the user wants to brainstorm and refine developer-experience, documentation, or tooling UX work through a "serene DX" aesthetic lens — three fixed variants that sweep across DX Bliss (frictionless), DX Serenity (calm clarity), and DX Sublimity (showcase-grade novelty). Triggers on phrases like "serene bliss", "DX bliss", "DX serenity", "DX sublimity", "reader happiness", "make this serene", "serene developer experience", or "serene DX". Runs the /weave:serene-bliss command, which dispatches three lens variants across all available models in parallel and judges each refine pass with a multi-model panel (Claude + Antigravity + GPT, peer-only averaging).
user-invocable	true
argument-hint	<prompt> [--passes=N] [--timeout=N|none] [--mode=fast|balanced|deep] [--judge=host|round-robin]

Weave Serene Bliss

A three-lens aesthetic brainstorm-and-refine pipeline for DX, documentation, and developer-tooling UX work. Each of the three weave variant slots carries a different serene-DX lens, so a single invocation yields three independent aesthetic takes before the refine phase picks and polishes the strongest.

When to Use

• Sphinx / MyST / docs site polish (badge styling, navigation, code fixture showcases, dark mode, mobile responsiveness)
• CLI / TUI output design — where logging and user-facing output need distinct visual channels
• Developer-tooling UX (error messages, empty states, onboarding flows)
• Component galleries, docs landing pages, and reference implementations where the output is consumed by humans reading docs

Do not use this for implementation work without a reference anchor named in the prompt — serene-DX prompts need something concrete to compare against.

The Three Serene Lenses

Slot	Lens	Aesthetic	Ask of each model
1	DX Bliss	Frictionless, delightful, zero-friction	"Make this feel effortless. Does every interaction feel weightless?"
2	DX Serenity	Calm, unhurried, information-architectural clarity	"Make this feel like a quiet library. Does the reader's eye rest naturally?"
3	DX Sublimity	Awe-inducing, showcase-grade, novel	"Make this feel like a first. Would this be memorable enough to screenshot?"

The lenses are exhaustive for serene-DX work — pick one aesthetic per invocation, not all four of the source-skill quality keywords. "Reader happiness" collapses into Serenity here; use it as a trigger phrase, not a fourth slot.

How to Invoke

Run the /weave:serene-bliss command. It is a locked preset of /weave:brainstorm-and-refine that fixes --variants=3 and a compound preamble mapping each variant slot to one of the three lenses.

/weave:serene-bliss "<user-prompt>" [--passes=N] [--timeout=N|none] [--mode=fast|balanced|deep] [--judge=host|round-robin]

The command locks --variants and --preamble; do not override either. For the canonical compound preamble text and the delegation contract, see ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/commands/serene-bliss.md.

Context Packet Expectations

Weave builds a standard context packet for every invocation. For serene-DX work, make sure the host surfaces these fields before invoking, so each lens has something concrete to react to:

• Reference anchor — a file path, URL, or snippet of a known-good implementation to compare against (e.g., libtmux-mcp/custom.css, a reference Sphinx theme, a CLI whose output you admire).
• Current state — the file, markup, or screenshot description of what looks ugly or broken right now. Name the ugly element explicitly; "the badges look like an eyesore" beats "improve the badges."
• Constraint envelope — what must NOT change (branch, file scope, no mutations) and what must be preserved (accessibility, WCAG, dark mode, NO_COLOR / FORCE_COLOR handling, mobile responsiveness).
• Technology stack — Sphinx + MyST, Furo variables, React + Tailwind, Python stdlib-only, etc. Each lens responds differently to what's idiomatic in the stack.
• Known gaps / unknowns — open questions the models should address rather than hand-wave past.

Anti-Patterns

• No reference anchor. Prompting for bliss / serenity / sublimity without a concrete comparison target produces generic advice from every lens. Always name a known-good implementation.
• No constraint envelope. Without explicit "do not modify files" and stack boundaries, models will start proposing edits instead of design critique.
• Mixing quality keywords in one invocation. The three slots already cover the range. Don't rephrase the prompt to ask for "bliss and serenity and sublimity at once" — that defeats the lens-differentiation that makes the brainstorm phase useful.
• Using this for implementation tasks. Serene-bliss is a design-research pattern. For actual code changes, run /weave:execute or /weave:prompt instead.