academic-writing-toolkit

Use when AI-assisted thesis edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of author control, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides spine cards, edit contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.

Stop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weak/越改越乱, version contamination, or possible gap/claim/evidence/venue-fit drift.

Build and audit the manuscript argument system: intent, gap-contribution alignment, hierarchical claims, evidence balance, limitations, and reviewer attack surfaces. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or rebuttal needs explicit intent registers, contribution chains, claim hierarchy, argument maps, evidence-fit checks, or reviewer-risk matrices before drafting, revision, peer review, or self-review.

Review another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacy, methods, evaluation, overclaim risks, structure, writing, required revisions, or recommendation without rewriting the manuscript or using private author context.

Review the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls. Use when asked for self-review, internal review, pre-submission review, readiness check, reviewer simulation on own work, or claim-evidence self-audit where prior chat memory, unstated assumptions, model background knowledge, or unlisted local notes must not be treated as evidence.

Reframe academic manuscript drafts that read like engineering reports, module inventories, internal validation packets, or system notes into paper-form scientific arguments with clear gap, contribution chain, results narrative, figure/table roles, AI-assisted component boundaries, and submission-readiness blockers.

Use when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checking row alignment, detecting cross-snapshot contamination, converting old labels to current schemas, generating refill/import CSVs, and deciding whether filled annotations are safe for formal aggregation.

Use when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.

Use when preparing, auditing, releasing, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, or agent-assisted drafts.

Build evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing review papers, thesis literature reviews, scoping reviews, or evidence syntheses where adjacent-domain evidence, candidate records, unpublished work, and unsupported claims must be kept separate.

Convert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.

Use when checking a thesis draft before submission for inconsistent numbers, terminology, cross-references, or citation problems.

Convert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.

Review chapter drafts for paragraph-level flow, transitions, and argument continuity before editing.

Check thesis text for British English consistency and safe mechanical spelling fixes.

Use when checking a thesis draft before submission for inconsistent numbers, terminology, cross-references, or citation problems.

Use when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.

Review chapter drafts for paragraph-level flow, transitions, and argument continuity before editing.

Show or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.

Record reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.

Check thesis text for British English consistency and safe mechanical spelling fixes.

Fact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.

Show reading and writing progress dashboard — how many sources read, chapters completed, word counts, and coverage gaps.

Map reading notes to thesis chapters and integrate key arguments into the manuscript. Use after completing a reading session to weave new material into the thesis.

Read PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.