docs-review

name	docs-review
description	Review benchflow documentation for drift, staleness, duplication, and alignment
user-invocable	true

Docs Review Skill

Review the repo's documentation against the current codebase and surface a punch list. Do not auto-fix. Report findings; let the user approve edits.

Commands

The user may say /docs-review with an optional argument:

• /docs-review — full review across all in-scope docs
• /docs-review <path> — single doc (e.g. /docs-review README.md)
• /docs-review --drift — fast subset: drift-vs-code + stale refs only

In-scope docs

Full review (all seven checks)

• docs/architecture.md
• docs/cli-reference.md
• docs/task-authoring.md
• docs/getting-started.md
• docs/labs.md
• README.md
• CLAUDE.md

Light-touch (checks 1, 2, 6 only — drift, stale refs, link integrity)

• .dev-docs/sdk-reference.md — internal SDK surface; verify class/function names + signatures still resolve in src/benchflow/.
• .dev-docs/harden-sandbox.md — sandbox hardening notes; verify referenced files / knobs / env vars still exist.
• .dev-docs/tested-agents.md — matrix of agent × model × provider; verify names still appear in agents/registry.py and agents/providers.py.

Skipped entirely

• .dev-docs/sdk-refactor-notes.md — dated refactor record (April 2026); historical, status language is expected. Do not flag or edit.
• Anything matching *-notes.md, *-archive.md.
• .smoke-jobs/, trajectories/, examples/, fixtures/ — generated or sample output, not documentation.

Checks

1. Drift vs. code

Project-structure trees, module one-liners, env var names, registry entries. Cross-check:

• ls src/benchflow/, ls src/benchflow/agents/, ls src/benchflow/acp/, ls src/benchflow/cli/ against trees in architecture.md and Key modules blocks in README/CLAUDE.
• Module descriptions — does sdk.py still own what the doc claims? Does job.py still drive the run loop? Spot-check first ~40 lines of each named module.
• Registry drift (high-churn surface). For each agent/provider name mentioned in docs, grep src/benchflow/agents/registry.py and src/benchflow/agents/providers.py. A name in docs but not in the registry dict → stale; a name in the registry but not documented where expected (docs/architecture.md matrix, .dev-docs/tested-agents.md) → gap.
• Env vars mentioned in docs (ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY, BENCHFLOW_*, etc.) — still referenced in src/benchflow/?
• pyproject.toml — python version pin, dep names, extras. Verify Setup / Install blocks in README and docs/getting-started.md.

2. Stale references

Grep each doc for file paths, function names, class names, CLI commands, task/agent IDs. For each hit, verify it resolves in the current tree:

• File paths → ls (watch for renames — e.g. a file split into a package, a private module prefix added like _acp_run.py).
• Function / class / decorator names (register_agent, SDK, RunResult, detect_services_from_dockerfile, …) → Grep in src/benchflow/ and the __init__.py re-exports.
• CLI commands (benchflow run, benchflow ls, benchflow view, …) → check the Typer app in src/benchflow/cli/.
• Task IDs referenced in examples → check examples/ and fixtures/.

3. Status-language rot

Grep for implementation-tracking words: CURRENT, NEXT, shipped, Phase \d, proposed, planned, not started, TODO, FIXME, WIP.

For each hit, ask: is this describing the design (stays true) or in-flight work (rots)? In-flight language belongs in commit messages, PR descriptions, or .dev-docs/*-notes.md, not user-facing reference docs.

Suppress for .dev-docs/*-notes.md — dated refactor notes legitimately carry status language.

4. Duplication

Any fact stated in ≥2 docs that could be a link instead? Big offenders for benchflow:

• Project-structure trees (belongs only in architecture.md)
• SDK Run Phases (SETUP → START → AGENT → VERIFY) — should live in architecture.md; others should link.
• Registry examples — one copy in architecture.md + one in task-authoring.md or .dev-docs/sdk-reference.md is OK if they illustrate distinct use cases; two near-identical register_agent(...) blocks is not.
• Agent × Model × Provider matrix — live in .dev-docs/tested-agents.md; architecture.md should link, not duplicate.
• Env var reference — should live in docs/getting-started.md or docs/cli-reference.md; not re-listed in README.

Target state: architecture.md is the sole deep reference for internals, cli-reference.md for commands, task-authoring.md for task YAML / verifier shape. README and CLAUDE.md link to them instead of duplicating.

5. Cross-doc alignment

• docs/cli-reference.md flag list ↔ actual Typer definitions in src/benchflow/cli/. Every documented flag resolves; every command in the CLI has a documented entry (or an intentional hide).
• docs/task-authoring.md YAML schema ↔ TaskConfig / loader in src/benchflow/tasks.py. Every field has a loader path.
• docs/architecture.md "Error Taxonomy" / "Trajectory event format" sections ↔ the actual dataclass fields in src/benchflow/models.py and emit sites in job.py / _trajectory.py.
• docs/architecture.md ACP Protocol section ↔ src/benchflow/acp/ and _acp_run.py.
• Cross-references between docs — does each [text](other-doc.md) link still point at a section that exists?

6. Link integrity

All markdown links resolve:

• [text](path) → file exists
• [text](path#Lnum) → line exists (file has ≥ N lines)
• [text](#heading) → heading exists in the same doc
• [text](../foo.md) → relative path resolves
• Inline backticked paths (`src/benchflow/sdk.py`) still exist — not strictly links, but the same drift vector.

7. Doc-role violations

• README.md: outward-facing only. Install / quickstart / one-screen architecture pointer. No full internals tree (use Key modules + link to docs/architecture.md). No deep rationale.
• CLAUDE.md: AI entry-point. Stays compact (~50 lines max — it's always loaded into Claude's context). Links to design docs rather than inlining them. Encodes conventions, not reference material.
• docs/architecture.md: sole deep reference for internals. All module descriptions, full project tree, SDK phases, registry pattern, error taxonomy live here.
• docs/cli-reference.md: flag-level reference. Not narrative.
• docs/task-authoring.md: task YAML + verifier contract. Not a "how benchflow works" overview — link to architecture for that.
• docs/getting-started.md / docs/labs.md: tutorial tone; design rationale belongs elsewhere.
• .dev-docs/: internal — can carry status language, refactor histories, signature tables.

Execution

For a full review:

1. Dispatch in parallel. Spawn one Explore agent per full-review doc. Each agent gets: the doc path, the seven checks, "report ≤ 250 words, concrete file:line references only, no prose rewrites." Light-touch docs get a trimmed prompt (checks 1, 2, 6 only). Skip entirely the docs under "Skipped entirely."

2. Synthesize. Merge agent findings into a single punch list. Group by severity:

   • Blocker — broken link, flat-out wrong fact, dead file reference, documented CLI flag that doesn't exist, agent/provider name that doesn't resolve in the registry. Reader will be misled.
   • Stale — outdated but currently harmless (old phase names, settled open questions, retired status labels, superseded rationale that's still correct-shaped).
   • Polish — duplication, doc-role creep, language smells.

   Each item: <severity> · <doc>:<line> — <one-line description>.

3. Ask for approval. Present the punch list. Do NOT start editing. Wait for "fix 1-4", "ignore 5, it's intentional", "all", or similar.

4. Apply fixes. Edit only what was approved. After edits, re-verify the specific items you touched (don't re-run the full review).

Anti-patterns

• Don't auto-fix. Surface findings; let the user decide.
• Don't false-positive on quoted history. A doc can mention a retired module inside a "previously this was structured as …" sentence without being stale. Verify each hit reads as a current reference, not a historical one, before flagging.
• Don't rewrite for style. Scope is factual drift and structure, not prose quality or tone.
• Don't grow scope. If a check isn't in the seven above, don't add it mid-review. File a suggestion in the punch list instead.
• Don't touch archives or refactor notes. .dev-docs/*-notes.md legitimately carry status language and reflect state at the time they were written; don't normalize them.
• Don't flag registry drift without reading the registry dict. registry.py and providers.py are the source of truth — a name missing from docs is a doc bug; a name missing from the registry is a code bug (surface separately, don't silently "fix" docs).

Example output

Docs review punch list (3 blocker, 4 stale, 2 polish)

Blockers:
- docs/architecture.md:114 — references AgentConfig at src/benchflow/agents/registry.py, but file defines AgentSpec (renamed)
- docs/cli-reference.md:142 — documents `benchflow verify --strict` flag; flag doesn't exist in cli/verify.py
- README.md:62 — example uses register_agent(..., model=...) kwarg; signature takes models=[...] (list)

Stale:
- docs/architecture.md:39 — "Phase 1: SETUP (host)" numbering implies sequential work-in-progress; phases are always-on
- docs/task-authoring.md:88 — "TODO: document verifier timeout knob"
- docs/getting-started.md:121 — example task ID "demo-fizzbuzz" renamed to "examples-fizzbuzz"
- .dev-docs/tested-agents.md:14 — lists claude-code-acp; registry only has claude-agent-acp

Polish:
- README.md:98-134 — full src/ tree duplicates docs/architecture.md:12-38
- CLAUDE.md:14-22 — Setup block duplicates docs/getting-started.md; consider linking

Reply with which to fix, or "all".