assumption-cascade

name	assumption-cascade
description	Tactic: Surface assumptions, sort by dependency, attack root assumptions first, then trace cascade failures through the dependency graph.
type	tactic
strategies	["assumption-challenge","systematic-probing","groupthink-mitigation"]
dependencies	{"sops":["assumption-cascade-tracer","devils-advocacy","finding-aggregation","key-assumptions-check","probe-execution"]}

Assumption Cascade Tactic

Attack assumptions at their roots and trace how failures propagate through dependency chains.

Orchestration

1. key-assumptions-check surfaces all assumptions (explicit and implicit)
2. assumption-cascade-tracer builds dependency graph (which assumptions depend on which)
3. Root assumptions identified (those with no upstream dependencies)
4. devils-advocacy constructs strongest attack against each root assumption
5. probe-execution tests root assumptions — if root fails, trace downstream cascade
6. assumption-cascade-tracer maps full cascade: which conclusions collapse if root fails
7. finding-aggregation reports cascade paths and total impact scope

Subagents Dispatched

• key-assumptions-check (1 call for enumeration)
• assumption-cascade-tracer (2 calls: dependency build + cascade trace)
• devils-advocacy (1 call per root assumption)
• probe-execution (1 call per root attack)
• finding-aggregation (1 call at end)

Termination Conditions

• All root assumptions tested (budget permitting)
• Cascade found that invalidates >50% of conclusions (critical finding)
• All assumptions survive attack (artifact resilient at assumption level)
• Budget exhausted (report partial coverage)

Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

SOP	When to use
assumption-cascade-tracer	Build assumption dependency graphs and trace cascade failures when root assumptions are invalidated.
devils-advocacy	Construct the strongest possible counter-argument against a position, steelmanning the opposition before attacking.
finding-aggregation	Aggregate, deduplicate, and classify findings from multiple probes into a coherent vulnerability report.
key-assumptions-check	Military ACT: systematically enumerate all assumptions, classify by type, and evaluate evidence strength supporting each.
probe-execution	Execute a single attack probe against an artifact, record the result with evidence and severity classification.