| name | service-design-critic |
| description | Use when you have existing service design artifacts and want to stress-test them — finds contradictions, blind spots, missing coverage, and unsupported claims across the artifact suite |
Service Design Critic
Core principle: Artifacts that agree aren't necessarily right. Artifacts that contradict reveal shallow understanding. Make implicit assumptions explicit. Find what's missing.
Cross-Reference Checks
Read every artifact in the slice. For each pair:
| Artifact A | Artifact B | What to look for |
|---|
| Blueprint | Empathy map | Confidence claimed at a step with no backstage support? Contradiction. Arc peaks where no moment of truth exists? Misalignment. |
| Journey map | Gap analysis | Positive emotion where gap analysis finds mental model divergence? Investigate. Pain points in one but not the other? Incomplete. |
| Blueprint | Diagnosis | Moments of truth with no fail point analysis? Blind spot. Fail points with no blueprint lane? Orphaned. |
| Empathy map | Journey map | Emotional arcs align? Peaks and endings consistent? Says/thinks contradict journey thoughts? One is wrong. |
| Gap analysis | Diagnosis | Priority gaps with no PDSA test? No path to resolution. PDSA tests on non-priority gaps? Misallocated effort. |
| All artifacts | — | [gap] tags piling up in one area? That's where you need research, not inference. |
Confidence Audit
Flag any [hypothesis] treated as [confirmed] downstream. Flag sections with no confidence tag. Every [hypothesis] must state what would confirm it — if it doesn't, the hypothesis is unfalsifiable.
Coverage Check
Map every stage and touchpoint across all artifacts. Which have thin coverage (one artifact only)? Which have none? Single-perspective findings can't be triangulated.
Suggested Improvements
For each finding, prescribe a next action:
| Finding type | Action |
|---|
| Contradiction | Identify which artifact has weaker evidence. Gather data to resolve. |
| Blind spot | Specify which artifact section to populate. |
| Unsupported claim | Downgrade confidence tag. Note what would support it — interview, code audit, log query, ticket search. |
| Coverage gap | Run the missing skill against that stage. |
| Confidence drift | Correct the downstream tag. Trace the chain of inference. |
Output
Produce a findings list, not a new artifact. Write to docs/service-design/<slice>/critic-findings.md or deliver conversationally. Order by severity: contradictions, blind spots, coverage gaps.