woos-roadmap-review-gate

Étoiles7

Forks1

Mis à jour16 juin 2026 à 10:16

Independent roadmap review gate for discovery. Checks roadmap quality and returns PASS or REQUEST_CHANGES.

Installation

Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.

Source

zero-click

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Ouvrir le dépôt GitHub Voir les dépôts du créateur

Téléchargement

Métiers associésSOC

Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC

Spécialistes en gestion de projetsProfessions des affaires et des opérations financières·SOC 13-1082

Explorateur de fichiers

2 fichiers

SKILL.md

readonly

name	woos-roadmap-review-gate
description	Independent roadmap review gate for discovery. Checks roadmap quality and returns PASS or REQUEST_CHANGES.
version	1.0.0
author	Hermes Profile
license	MIT
metadata	{"hermes":{"tags":["product","roadmap","review","gate"],"related_skills":["woos-product-discovery","woos-roadmap-authoring"]}}

Roadmap Review Gate

Output Language

Author all user-facing prose (narratives, findings, summaries) in the user's most recent input language (e.g. if the user is writing in Chinese, write the PRD body, review findings, and summaries in Chinese).
Keep these tokens verbatim in English regardless of the user's language, because they are contract identifiers consumed by other skills and gates:
- Verdict tokens: PASS, REQUEST_CHANGES, BLOCKED, NOT_RUN
- Severity tokens: critical, high, medium, low, warning
- Tag tokens: [ASSUMPTION: ...], [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...], [NEEDS INPUT: ...]
- Phase / dimension IDs: P0 … P11, P2a, Phase A, Phase B
- Shape values: internal-tool, single-operator, consumer-product, multi-stakeholder, CLI
- P0 rating values: strong, adequate, thin, broken
- Section headings declared in templates (e.g. ## Background, ## Functional Requirements, ## Assumptions Index) — translations break downstream structural checks
- Field labels inside templates (e.g. **Consequences (testable):**, **Out of Scope:**, **User value:**, Given … When … Then …)
Code, file paths, IDs, and quoted PRD excerpts stay in their original form.

Purpose

Review the roadmap in fresh context before architecture work continues.

Required Load Set (mandatory)

references/persona-prd-validator.md
docs/product/<project>-roadmap.md
ideas/<slug>/00-idea-capture.md

If any required file is not loaded, return BLOCKED.

Output

docs/reviews/<project>-roadmap-review-rN.md

Checklist

#	Criterion	Fix Hint
R1	Vision differentiated	Add a distinct angle compared with alternatives
R2	Versioning logical	Keep V1 independently shippable
R3	Metrics measurable	Replace vague claims with observable thresholds
R4	Non-goals effective	State concrete exclusions
R5	Decision Log sound	Record real alternatives and rationale
R6	Personas grounded	Tie personas to evidence or observed behavior

Every row must have a finding and status.

Plus depuis ce dépôt

même dépôt

woos-architecture-overview

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Produce the high-level architecture overview used by downstream product design and engineering.

2026-06-167

woos-architecture-review-gate

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Independent high-level architecture review gate for discovery.

2026-06-167

woos-idea-capture

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Capture and structure raw ideas through guided interview or quick note. Produces a structured idea document ready for research or PRD pass. Focuses purely on product intent — no technical decisions.

2026-06-167

woos-idea-to-design

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Entry-point product workflow from raw idea to validated product design artifacts. Stops at reviewed PRD readiness and does not include engineering implementation.

2026-06-167

woos-prd-authoring

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Write the per-feature PRD from the ranked requirements contract using the mandatory PRD template.

2026-06-167

woos-prd-consistency-audit

zero-click/zero-ratchet

Dedicated analyze gate for PRD and UI brief consistency. Runs script extraction first, then semantic review with evidence-backed findings.

2026-06-167

Roadmap Review Gate

Output Language

Author all user-facing prose (narratives, findings, summaries) in the user's most recent input language (e.g. if the user is writing in Chinese, write the PRD body, review findings, and summaries in Chinese).

Keep these tokens verbatim in English regardless of the user's language, because they are contract identifiers consumed by other skills and gates:

Verdict tokens: PASS, REQUEST_CHANGES, BLOCKED, NOT_RUN
Severity tokens: critical, high, medium, low, warning
Tag tokens: [ASSUMPTION: ...], [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...], [NEEDS INPUT: ...]
Phase / dimension IDs: P0 … P11, P2a, Phase A, Phase B
Shape values: internal-tool, single-operator, consumer-product, multi-stakeholder, CLI
P0 rating values: strong, adequate, thin, broken
Section headings declared in templates (e.g. ## Background, ## Functional Requirements, ## Assumptions Index) — translations break downstream structural checks
Field labels inside templates (e.g. **Consequences (testable):**, **Out of Scope:**, **User value:**, Given … When … Then …)

Code, file paths, IDs, and quoted PRD excerpts stay in their original form.

Purpose

Review the roadmap in fresh context before architecture work continues.

Required Load Set (mandatory)

references/persona-prd-validator.md

docs/product/<project>-roadmap.md

ideas/<slug>/00-idea-capture.md

If any required file is not loaded, return BLOCKED.

Output

docs/reviews/<project>-roadmap-review-rN.md

Checklist

Criterion

Fix Hint

Vision differentiated

Add a distinct angle compared with alternatives

Versioning logical

Keep V1 independently shippable

Metrics measurable

Replace vague claims with observable thresholds

Non-goals effective

State concrete exclusions

Decision Log sound

Record real alternatives and rationale

Personas grounded

Tie personas to evidence or observed behavior

Every row must have a finding and status.