| name | copy-planner |
| type | planner |
| description | Plan content briefs — audience, goals, messaging, success criteria. Prevents rewrites and scope drift before drafting. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
Copy Planner Skill
JTBD (Jobs To Be Done)
Primary Job
When copy needs to be written but the team is not yet aligned on audience, message, and success criteria,
I want a clear brief before drafting starts,
so I can avoid expensive rewrites and keep everyone working toward the same outcome.
Secondary Jobs
- When multiple stakeholders need input before writing, I want one agreed specification, so I can reduce debate during review.
- When a campaign or page is starting from scratch, I want a structured content plan, so the writer knows what "done" actually means.
Job Layers
- Functional: Create a content brief that defines audience, goals, structure, message, and review criteria before copy is written.
- Emotional: Reduce the frustration of endless revisions, vague direction, and shifting stakeholder expectations.
- Social: Helps the user look organized and strategically clear to writers, editors, marketers, and approvers.
This Skill Is For
- A user starting a page, campaign, blog post, email sequence, or messaging refresh and wanting alignment before writing.
- A user who wants to prevent scope creep or revision churn by locking a brief first.
- A user coordinating multiple contributors who need one shared target.
This Skill Is NOT For
- A user who already has finished copy and wants it reviewed; use
copy-critic.
- A user doing purely exploratory brainstorming with no need to lock the brief yet.
Paired With
copy-critic: After the draft exists, use it to review against the brief and quality criteria.
seo-advisor: Use it when discoverability and search-intent alignment should shape the content structure.
brand-voice-guide: Use it when voice and tone need stronger grounding in the brief.
Resolution Paths
| User's Situation | What Happens | What They Leave With |
|---|
| Starting new content with unclear alignment | Copy Planner defines the brief | A writing target everyone can agree on |
| Managing many stakeholders | Copy Planner consolidates expectations | A shared decision document |
| Planning content that must also be discoverable | Copy Planner structures the brief, then hands off to seo-advisor as needed | A brief with stronger structural alignment |
When to Escalate
- If the user already has draft copy and needs evaluation, escalate to
copy-critic.
- If the user needs search-data-driven keyword work rather than structural planning, escalate to dedicated SEO tools outside this repo.
Purpose
Writing without a brief is like building without a blueprint. Content briefs prevent costly rewrites, misaligned messaging, and off-brand deliverables. This skill creates strategic content specifications that guide writers, align teams, and enable efficient copy-critic review.
A good brief answers:
- WHO are we writing for? (audience, persona, psychographics)
- WHAT is the goal? (awareness, conversion, engagement, retention)
- WHY should they care? (value prop, key message, hook)
- HOW should we approach this? (tone, format, structure, evidence)
- WHEN is success? (metrics, review criteria, handoff checklist)
Without these answers locked in, writers guess. Stakeholders disagree. Multiple revision rounds follow.
Use When
- Starting a new web page (landing page, product page, resource hub)
- Planning a blog post or thought leadership piece
- Creating an email campaign (drip series, newsletter, transactional)
- Developing social media content (organic or paid)
- Writing product descriptions, service pages, or case studies
- Launching new messaging for a campaign or brand refresh
- Multiple people need to provide input before writing begins
- You want to avoid mid-project scope creep or revision cycles
Do Not Use When
- You're in an emergency rewrite cycle (write first, brief after)
- The content is purely exploratory/brainstorm (brief comes after exploration)
- You already have a detailed creative direction from a designer/strategist
- You're iterating on existing content (use copy-critic to review instead)
Why This Exists
Real-World Problems This Solves
Scenario 1: Web page written without audience clarity
- Writer assumes B2C SMB audience; stakeholder expected B2B enterprise
- Page emphasizes ease-of-use; enterprise buyers needed security credentials
- CTA is "Start Free Trial"; enterprise buyers need "Request Demo"
- Result: 3-round revision cycle, launch delay
Scenario 2: Email copy without success criteria
- Campaign sent without agreed metrics
- Copywriter optimizes for opens; marketer measured conversions
- Same data, different conclusions
- Result: Team debate, unclear if campaign succeeded
Scenario 3: Blog post without outline agreement
- Writer delivers 4,000-word deep dive
- Editor expected 1,200 words
- 60% of content needs cutting
- Result: Frustration, extended timeline
Scenario 4: Product description without brand voice alignment
- Copy mirrors competitor tone (clinical, feature-focused)
- Brand voice is conversational, benefit-focused
- Review round reveals mismatch
- Result: Major rewrite instead of fine-tune
The Brief Prevents This: All stakeholders align on goals, format, tone, and success criteria before writing begins. Writers have a clear target. Reviewers know what "done" looks like.
Companion Skills
- copy-critic: Reviews finished copy against the brief. Completes the write-review cycle.
- brand-voice-guide: Defines organizational tone and style. Referenced in brief Phase 1 (brand voice specification).
- seo-advisor: Handles keyword strategy and technical SEO. Briefing phase includes structural topic planning (not data-driven SEO optimization).
- doc-coauthoring: Used in Phase 5 for collaborative brief refinement and handoff document creation.
Skill Steps
Step 1: Intake & Scope Clarification
Gather initial brief context:
- Content type/format (what kind of content?)
- Business goal (what should this content achieve?)
- Target audience segment (who reads this?)
- Key constraint (timeline, length, format, brand guidelines)
Step 2: Content Brief Type Selection
Confirm which brief template applies:
- Web Page Brief (landing, product, about, resource, service)
- Blog Post Brief (thought leadership, how-to, listicle, case study, industry analysis)
- Email Brief (nurture drip, newsletter, transactional, promotional)
- Social Media Brief (organic feed content, paid ad copy, story/carousel)
- Product Description Brief (ecommerce, app store, catalog)
- General Marketing Brief (campaign-level messaging, repositioning, announcement)
Step 3: Execute Full Planning Protocol (Phases 1-5)
Run the embedded protocol below with stakeholder input.
Step 4: Create Deliverables
Generate:
- Content Brief (master document with all phases)
- Writer's Outline (section-by-section structure with key points)
- Quality Checklist (for writer + reviewer)
- Review Criteria (for copy-critic pass)
Step 5: Handoff & Iteration
- Export brief document (Google Doc, Notion, or markdown)
- Establish review workflow (who reviews? copy-critic or manual review?)
- Set success metrics
- Prepare for doc-coauthoring workflow for collaborative refinement
Full Copy Planning Protocol
Phase 1 — Audience & Goal Definition
Purpose: Lock in WHO we're writing for and WHAT we want them to do.
Prompts & Questions:
1. Target Persona
- Primary audience segment (job title, industry, company size, experience level)
- Demographics (age range, location, education level)
- Psychographics (mindset, values, priorities, pain points)
- Current awareness state (unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware)
- Decision-making role (user, influencer, decision-maker, buyer)
Example: Primary: Marketing director at mid-market B2B SaaS. Age 30-45, manages 2-5 person team. Pain points: limited budget for tools, pressure to prove ROI, overwhelmed by vendor options. Currently aware of the problem but evaluating solutions.
2. Content Goal (select one, can have secondary)
- Awareness: Introduce product/concept to new audience
- Consideration: Help audience evaluate options or understand approach
- Conversion: Drive action (signup, purchase, demo request, consultation)
- Retention/Advocacy: Deepen relationship with existing customers
- Education: Build expertise and trust as thought leader
3. One-Sentence Key Message
The single idea readers should remember after consuming content.
Bad: "We offer cloud-based marketing automation." (feature)
Good: "Modern marketing teams spend 30% less time on manual tasks when they adopt intelligent automation." (outcome)
4. Desired Action (CTA)
What specific action should the reader take after consuming the content?
- Sign up for email list
- Download resource
- Request demo
- Make purchase
- Visit product page
- Share content
- Schedule consultation
5. Success Metrics (how will we know this content worked?)
- Pageviews / unique visitors
- Time on page (engagement depth)
- Conversion rate (clicks to CTA)
- Engagement (shares, comments, saves)
- Email open/click rate (if applicable)
- Lead quality (sales qualified vs. MQL)
- Brand lift (perception shift)
6. Brand Voice Reference
- Link to brand-voice-guide if available
- Key tone attributes (professional/conversational, formal/casual, expert/peer, authoritative/helpful)
- Any content examples that nail your voice
Phase 2 — Content Strategy
Purpose: Choose the FORMAT and ANGLE that best reaches the audience with the message.
1. Content Type & Format Selection
Selected: _______
Rationale:
- Why this format? (matches audience consumption preference, aligns with goal, fits platform)
- What competing formats were considered and rejected?
- Format specifications (word count if known, visual requirements, interactive elements)
Examples by Content Type:
| Type | Format Options | Best For |
|---|
| Web Page | Long-form sales page, scannable product page, detailed resource guide, FAQ, comparison | Different audience readiness levels |
| Blog | How-to tutorial, original research, curated roundup, listicle, case study, opinion | SEO, thought leadership, audience education |
| Email | Promotional, educational, re-engagement, nurture sequence, announcement | Warm audiences, multi-touch campaigns |
| Social | Text-only carousel, video teaser, quote graphic, behind-the-scenes, live stream, CTA post | Platform-specific, fast consumption |
| Product Description | Feature-focused, benefit-focused, lifestyle positioning, technical specifications, use case | Shopping context, product discovery |
2. Keyword/Topic Research Summary
(Note: Structural topic planning, not SEO data optimization)
Topics to cover (in priority order):
- Primary topic (what's the main subject?)
- Secondary topics (what supports the main idea?)
- Related concepts reader needs context for
- Objection/concern topics to address
- Comparison topics (if competitive positioning needed)
3. Competitor Content Analysis
What exists in this space?
- Competitor pieces (titles, angles, length)
- What are they doing well?
- What gaps exist? (What's missing or underexplained?)
- How will your content be different?
4. Content Angle/Hook
What makes THIS piece unique or compelling?
- Angle: "Automation + human touch" instead of "automation replaces people"
- Hook: "Most teams waste 30 hours/month on busywork" (opens with tension)
- Unique data/research: "Our analysis of 500+ teams shows..."
- Contrarian take: "Industry best practice is wrong because..."
- Personal narrative: "Here's how we changed our process..."
5. Tone and Reading Level
- Tone: (reference brand voice)
- Professional/Conversational
- Formal/Casual
- Expert/Peer
- Authoritative/Approachable
- Reading level target:
- Executive summary (skim in 2 min)
- General reader (8th grade+ reading level)
- Industry expert (specialized terminology acceptable)
- Mixed audience (explain jargon, multiple difficulty levels)
6. Length Recommendation with Justification
Recommended length: _______ words
Rationale:
- Audience consumption context (how much time do they have?)
- Topic complexity (simple = shorter, complex = longer)
- Platform/medium requirements
- Precedent (what performs well for this audience?)
- Format requirements (scannable lists need different length than narrative)
Phase 3 — Content Architecture
Purpose: Design the STRUCTURE that guides reader from headline to CTA.
1. Outline/Structure with Section Purposes
Intro/Hook Section
- Purpose: Capture attention, establish relevance, preview value
- Length guideline: 50-150 words
- Key elements:
- Hook (question, statistic, or tension)
- Reader benefit statement (why they should keep reading)
- Preview of what's covered
- [Include bridge to main section]
Main Body Section 1: [Topic]
- Purpose: [What should reader understand/believe after this section?]
- Key points to cover:
- Evidence needed: (statistic, example, testimony, screenshot)
- Transition to next section: [how does this connect?]
Main Body Section 2: [Topic]
- Purpose: [Learning objective]
- Key points:
- Evidence needed:
- Transition:
[Continue for all main body sections]
Objection/Concern Section
- Purpose: Address "but what about..." questions before reader leaves
- Common objections to counter:
- Objection 1 → Counter
- Objection 2 → Counter
- Format: FAQ, short paragraphs, or [other]
CTA/Closing Section
- Purpose: Clarify next step and remove friction
- CTA button/link text: [e.g., "Request Your Free Demo"]
- Supporting text: [brief why they should act now]
- Secondary CTA: [optional backup action if primary feels too big]
- Trust signals: (testimonial quote, guarantee, social proof, credential)
2. Heading Hierarchy
H1: [Main headline]
H2: Section 1 Topic
[Body content]
H3: Subsection detail if needed
H2: Section 2 Topic
[Body content]
H2: Objections
[Body content]
H2: CTA Section
[Body content]
3. Key Points Per Section
(Already covered in outline above — ensure 2-4 key ideas per section)
4. CTA Placement Strategy
- Primary CTA location: [top, middle, bottom, or multiple placements?]
- CTA format: [button, inline link, form, calendar, other]
- CTA frequency: [how many times is this CTA repeated?]
- Rationale: [why this placement works for this audience]
5. Trust Signals Needed
Identify where credibility is essential:
- Customer testimonial/review: [what should it cover?]
- Statistical evidence: [what stat would validate the claim?]
- Credential/authority: [expert name, certification, publication]
- Security/compliance badge: [if relevant to B2B purchase decision]
- Before/after or case study: [which scenario to feature?]
- Guarantee/promise: [what removes risk?]
6. Visual Content Guidance
- Hero image: [what should it convey? style?]
- Inline images/screenshots: [where and why?]
- Diagrams/infographics: [concepts that need visualization?]
- Video: [where would video add value? what type?]
- Icons/graphics: [navigation, feature callouts, step-by-step illustration?]
- Alt-text approach: [descriptive for accessibility]
7. Internal/External Link Strategy
- Internal links: [what should link to existing content to build SEO authority?]
- External links: [what resources should we cite? credibility signals?]
- Competitor references: [any useful comparisons to reference?]
Phase 4 — Evidence & Source Planning
Purpose: Identify what RESEARCH and ASSETS we need before writing begins.
1. Claims That Need Citations
List every assertion that requires support:
-
Claim: "Automation reduces manual work by 30%"
Source needed: [industry report, research study, case data?]
Priority: [high/medium/low]
-
Claim: [Next claim]
Source needed:
Priority:
[Continue for all major claims]
2. Statistics/Data to Gather
3. Subject Matter Expert Interviews Needed
-
Interview 1: [What expert, what topic, what quote do we need?]
Name/Contact: [if known]
Timeline: [by when?]
-
Interview 2:
Name/Contact:
Timeline:
4. Competitor References to Analyze
- Competitor A: [URL, what are they saying?]
- Competitor B: [URL, what angles are they taking?]
- Competitive advantage we're highlighting: [how we differ]
5. Brand Assets to Incorporate
- Logo placement: [where, size, usage]
- Product screenshots: [which features to show?]
- Company photos: [team, office, events?]
- Customer logos: [which customers to feature?]
- Case study data: [metrics, quotes, results]
Phase 5 — Quality Assurance Planning
Purpose: Define what "done" looks like and set up for efficient review.
1. Brand Voice Checklist
(Pulled from brand-voice-guide or defined here)
Before copy-critic review, writer should verify:
2. Reading Level Target
- Target readability score: [Flesch-Kincaid grade level, ___]
- Approach: [short paragraphs, subheadings, bullet points, glossary for terms, other]
3. Accessibility Requirements
- Alt-text: [descriptive image captions for every visual]
- Plain language: [define acronyms on first use, explain acronyms]
- Link text: [descriptive link anchors, not "click here"]
- Heading hierarchy: [proper H1→H2→H3 nesting for screen readers]
- Color contrast: [text readable on background, not color-coded as sole identifier]
4. SEO Requirements (technical page elements)
- Meta title: [recommended title tag, 50-60 characters]
- Meta description: [recommended description, 155-160 characters]
- H1 tag: [should include primary keyword naturally]
- URL slug: [recommended URL structure]
- Internal link anchors: [2-3 internal pages to link to]
5. Review Workflow
Who reviews this and in what order?
- Writer self-review: [use brand voice checklist above]
- [Stakeholder review]: [marketing, product, legal, other?]
- copy-critic subagent: Runs automated review against this brief + brand-voice-guide
- [Final sign-off]: [who approves before publication?]
Timeline: [how many days for each stage?]
6. Success Criteria for Finished Piece
The brief is done when:
The content is successful when:
Tool Usage
Recommended Workflow
- Intake conversation: Gather initial context (goal, audience, type, constraints)
- Brief template selection: Choose the right template above
- Collaborative completion: Work through Phases 1-5 with stakeholder input
- Export brief: Save as shared document (Google Doc, Markdown, Notion) for reference during writing
- Handoff to writer: Writer receives outline + checklist + success criteria
- Review setup: Prepare for copy-critic pass or manual review
- Iterative refinement: If brief needs adjustment during writing, use doc-coauthoring skill for collaborative updates
Integration with doc-coauthoring Skill
When brief needs to be refined collaboratively:
- Use doc-coauthoring
compose phase for initial drafting
- Use
refine phase for stakeholder feedback incorporation
- Use
test phase to validate brief against draft copy
Integration with copy-critic Skill
After copy is written:
- Invoke copy-critic with this brief as reference
- copy-critic checks finished copy against all brief criteria
- Results feed back into revision cycle (if needed) or publication approval
Examples
Example 1: Landing Page Brief
Content Type: Web Page (Product Landing)
Goal: Drive conversions from marketing campaign traffic
Audience: Marketing manager at SMB, evaluating email marketing tools
Key Message: Save 10 hours/week on repetitive email tasks, focus on strategy
Phase 1: [Persona: Marketing director, 2-5 person team, limited budget, wants ROI proof]
Phase 2: [Format: Scannable landing page, 1200 words, benefit-focused design]
Phase 3: [Structure: Problem → Solution → Proof → CTA with 3 objection counters]
Phase 4: [Sources: Customer case study (30% time savings), ROI calculator, 2 testimonials]
Phase 5: [Success: 8% CTA click rate, 2% conversion to demo request, tone passes brand check]
Example 2: Blog Post Brief
Content Type: Blog Post (How-To)
Goal: Awareness + thought leadership positioning
Audience: Early-stage founder learning startup operations
Key Message: Delegation is a learned skill, not a sign of weakness—here's the framework
Phase 1: [Persona: First-time founder, solopreneur mindset, overwhelmed by 100 tasks]
Phase 2: [Format: Step-by-step guide, 2000 words, conversational tone, personal narrative]
Phase 3: [Structure: Intro (vulnerability) → 5-step framework → mistakes to avoid → CTA for mini-course]
Phase 4: [Sources: Founder interviews (3), book references (2), personal experience, no original research]
Phase 5: [Success: 500+ pageviews, 30+ email signups, shares indicate resonance]
Notes
- Briefing is not waste: It feels slower upfront but saves 2-3x time in revision cycles. Measure time-to-publication, not time-to-first-draft.
- Stakeholder alignment: Brief creates the conversation about what success looks like before writing begins. Saves argument later.
- Reusable briefs: For content series or recurring content types, save templates and refine them over time.
- Brief-to-draft ratio: Good brief should reduce writing time by 30-40%. Writer should not be making strategy decisions while drafting.
- copy-critic integration: Pair this skill with copy-critic for end-to-end write-review cycle. Brief provides context; copy-critic enforces execution.
Frontmatter Installation Note
When installed via npx claude-skills add or manual copy to ~/.claude/skills/copy-planner/, this SKILL.md becomes a slash command /copy-planner available in Claude Code.
To invoke:
/copy-planner
This routes to the associated agent (copy-planner.md in ~/.claude/agents/), which runs the full planning protocol.