Menu
Review dashboards for metric clarity, layout effectiveness, drill-down paths, and data integrity.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Use when you have an existing component, flow, or interface and need an evidence-backed accessibility design review after basic checks pass. Best for focus management, ARIA pattern quality, semantics, and state communication gaps automated tools miss.
Use when you know what component, flow, or interface you need but not yet the right accessibility approach. Best for turning requirements into an accessible implementation plan before code hardens bad interaction and state patterns.
Review content for Google AI Overview eligibility — RAG retrievability, E-E-A-T signal completeness, fan-out coverage, semantic HTML for agent parsability, schema markup quality.
Plan AI Overview readiness improvements — RAG retrievability, E-E-A-T signals, query fan-out coverage, semantic HTML, schema markup, agentic channel setup.
Assess organizational AI readiness — capabilities, gaps, adoption roadmap for strategic planning.
Alex Urevick-Ackelsberg's personal writing voice and style. Use this skill whenever writing AS Alex or ghostwriting content that should sound like him — emails to clients, community posts, conference session descriptions, proposals, LinkedIn posts, listserv replies, internal strategy docs, or any communication where Alex is the named author. Also use when Alex asks you to 'write this up,' 'draft a response,' 'help me write,' or when the output needs his voice rather than a generic professional tone. This is Alex's PERSONAL voice — for Zivtech brand/marketing content, use zivtech-writing-style instead (though both can apply when Alex is writing on behalf of Zivtech).
| name | dashboard-critic |
| type | critic |
| description | Review dashboards for metric clarity, layout effectiveness, drill-down paths, and data integrity. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
Primary triggers:
dashboard-plannerdashboard-executordataviz-critic| Situation | Route |
|---|---|
| Have a dashboard, need architecture review | This skill |
| Have a dashboard, need individual chart review | Use dataviz-critic |
| Need to design a dashboard | Use dashboard-planner |
| Need to generate a dashboard | Use dashboard-executor |
| Dashboard critic returns REVISE/REJECT | Route fixes to dashboard-planner for re-planning |
| Area | What's Evaluated |
|---|---|
| KPI Hierarchy | Do primary → supporting → diagnostic metrics decompose logically? |
| Information Architecture | Does spatial layout support decision-making flow? |
| Filter Architecture | Do global filters cascade? Cross-filtering work? Sensible defaults? |
| Drill-Down Paths | Can users navigate deeper without losing context? |
| Cross-Chart Consistency | Same category = same color everywhere? Aligned time axes? |
| Responsive Layout | Does column collapse preserve comparison context? |
| Performance | Chart count, data volume, lazy loading, debounced filters? |
| Accessibility | ARIA landmarks, keyboard nav, screen reader, alt text, contrast? |
Listed under the Critics table.
Trigger signals: review dashboard, critique dashboard, dashboard review, evaluate dashboard, dashboard architecture review, check dashboard KPIs