self-improvement

---

name: self-improvement description: "捕获学习经验、错误和纠正信息以实现持续改进。触发：命令失败、用户纠正（"不对"、"其实..."）、能力缺失、外部 API 失败、知识过时、发现更优方案；执行重要任务前回顾经验。不适用于：无学习价值的一次性修复、系统级配置变更。" metadata:

Self-Improvement Skill

Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.

Quick Reference

Situation	Action
Command/operation fails	Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md
User corrects you	Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category correction
User wants missing feature	Log to .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md
API/external tool fails	Log to .learnings/ERRORS.md with integration details
Knowledge was outdated	Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category knowledge_gap
Found better approach	Log to .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with category best_practice
Simplify/Harden recurring patterns	Log/update .learnings/LEARNINGS.md with Source: simplify-and-harden and a stable Pattern-Key
Similar to existing entry	Link with **See Also**, consider priority bump
Broadly applicable learning	Promote to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and/or .github/copilot-instructions.md
Workflow improvements	Promote to AGENTS.md (OpenClaw workspace)
Tool gotchas	Promote to TOOLS.md (OpenClaw workspace)
Behavioral patterns	Promote to SOUL.md (OpenClaw workspace)

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you notice:

Corrections (→ learning with correction category):

• "No, that's not right..."
• "Actually, it should be..."
• "You're wrong about..."
• "That's outdated..."

Feature Requests (→ feature request):

• "Can you also..."
• "I wish you could..."
• "Is there a way to..."
• "Why can't you..."

Knowledge Gaps (→ learning with knowledge_gap category):

• User provides information you didn't know
• Documentation you referenced is outdated
• API behavior differs from your understanding

Errors (→ error entry):

• Command returns non-zero exit code
• Exception or stack trace
• Unexpected output or behavior
• Timeout or connection failure

Priority Guidelines

Priority	When to Use
critical	Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue
high	Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue
medium	Moderate impact, workaround exists
low	Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have

Area Tags

Area	Scope
frontend	UI, components, client-side code
backend	API, services, server-side code
infra	CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud
tests	Test files, testing utilities, coverage
docs	Documentation, comments, READMEs
config	Configuration files, environment, settings

Best Practices

1. Log immediately - context is freshest right after the issue
2. Be specific - future agents need to understand quickly
3. Include reproduction steps - especially for errors
4. Link related files - makes fixes easier
5. Suggest concrete fixes - not just "investigate"
6. Use consistent categories - enables filtering
7. Promote aggressively - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md
8. Review regularly - stale learnings lose value

Route Table

Topic	Reference
Setup (OpenClaw / Generic / Multi-Agent)	setup.md
Logging format (Learning / Error / Feature entries)	logging-format.md
Promoting to project memory	promotion.md
Simplify & Harden, Skill Extraction, Hooks, Gitignore	advanced-features.md

Periodic Review

Review .learnings/ at natural breakpoints:

When to Review

• Before starting a new major task
• After completing a feature
• When working in an area with past learnings
• Weekly during active development

Quick Status Check

# Count pending items
grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l

# List pending high-priority items
grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["

# Find learnings for a specific area
grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md