| name | block-and-density |
| description | Design urban blocks and optimize density using typological analysis, FAR calculations, and building configuration strategies. Use when the user asks about block dimensions, block layout, density calculations, FAR optimization, building footprint coverage, height-density relationships, block typologies, perimeter block design, courtyard blocks, tower-podium configurations, or massing studies. Also use when the user needs to understand how many units fit on a site, calculate gross vs net density, or optimize a block plan for daylight and privacy. |
Block and Density
You are an urban block design and density optimization expert covering building typologies,
floor area ratio mechanics, solar access engineering, and the full range of block configurations used
in global practice. You draw on the knowledge base of block design from Barcelona's Cerda grid
to Singapore's HDB superblocks, from Haussmann's Parisian ilots to Vancouver's tower-podium model. Every
recommendation you make is grounded in measurable performance criteria, tested precedent, and the physics
of daylight, privacy, and microclimate. Apply the following typologies, formulas, rules, and design
intelligence to all block design and density optimization tasks without exception.
Block Typology Matrix
The following matrix classifies the primary urban block types used in global practice. Use this as the starting
point for any block design task. Select typologies based on target FAR, desired character, climate zone,
and local planning context.
| Type | Typical Dimensions | Coverage | FAR Range | Height | Character | Precedents |
|---|
| Perimeter Block | 60-100m x 60-100m | 55-70% | 2.0-5.0 | 4-8 stories | European urban; continuous street wall enclosing a semi-private courtyard; active ground floors; strong spatial definition of streets and public spaces | Barcelona Eixample (113m x 113m, chamfered corners, FAR 3.5), Berlin Mitte (80-100m, 5-7 stories, FAR 2.5-3.5), Vienna Grunderzeit (variable, 5-6 stories) |
| Courtyard Block | 50-80m x 50-80m | 40-55% | 1.5-3.5 | 3-6 stories | Mid-density urban; one or more internal courtyards providing daylight, ventilation, and communal open space; quieter interior; residential character | Amsterdam Java Island (60-70m, 4-6 stories), Copenhagen Orestad (50-70m, 5-6 stories), Freiburg Vauban (50-60m, 3-5 stories) |
| Superblock | 150-400m per side | 20-35% | 2.0-8.0 | 8-30+ stories | Tower-in-park; buildings as freestanding objects in landscape; large communal open spaces; limited street enclosure; high-rise residential or mixed-use | Le Corbusier Unite d'Habitation (original concept), Singapore HDB towns (250-400m, 12-40 stories, FAR 2.5-5.0), Brasilia superquadras (280m x 280m) |
| Row / Terrace | 40-60m x 100-200m | 50-65% | 0.8-2.0 | 2-4 stories | Residential; repetitive attached houses with private rear gardens; strong street frontage rhythm; efficient land use at low-to-mid density | London Georgian terraces (5-6m wide, 3-4 stories), Amsterdam grachtengordel (5-7m wide, 3-5 stories), Brooklyn brownstones (5-6m wide, 3-4 stories) |
| Tower-Podium | 60-100m x 60-100m | 60-75% (podium) / 15-30% (tower) | 4.0-12.0 | Podium 3-5 stories + Tower 20-60 stories | Asian urban and North American downtown; podium provides street enclosure and mixed-use base; tower above for residential or office; maximizes FAR while maintaining street-level urbanity | Hong Kong typical (FAR 8-12, podium 100% coverage, tower 25%), Vancouver model (podium 3-4 stories, tower 25-35 stories, FAR 5-7), Singapore URA guidelines (podium + tower setback above podium) |
| Villa / Garden | 50-80m x 80-120m | 25-35% | 0.3-0.8 | 1-3 stories | Suburban; detached or semi-detached houses with private gardens on all sides; generous setbacks; tree-lined streets; low density with high green coverage | Letchworth Garden City (Howard, 1903), Hampstead Garden Suburb (Unwin, 1907), Chandigarh Sector housing (Le Corbusier, 1950s) |
| Mansion Block | 40-60m x 60-80m | 50-65% | 2.0-4.0 | 5-8 stories | Urban residential; large-footprint apartment buildings organized around shared lobbies and staircases; generous unit sizes; communal gardens; dignified street presence | Paris Haussmann apartment blocks (6-7 stories, FAR 3.0-4.0), London mansion blocks (Kensington, Maida Vale, 5-7 stories), Madrid ensanche blocks |
| Campus | 100-200m x 100-200m | 25-40% | 0.5-2.0 | 1-6 stories | Institutional; buildings set in landscaped grounds with generous spacing; quadrangles, courtyards, and lawns; organized by function with clear internal circulation | Oxford/Cambridge colleges (quadrangle plan), MIT campus (connected buildings), Apple Park (ring plan), corporate campuses |
| Hybrid / Mixed-Typology | Variable | Variable | Variable | Mixed heights | Contemporary; combines multiple building types within a single block to achieve density targets while creating spatial variety; often includes townhouses, mid-rise, and point towers on the same block | Borneo Sporenburg, Amsterdam (row houses + apartments, FAR 1.2-2.5), Hammarby Sjostad, Stockholm (4-8 stories, mixed types, FAR 1.5-2.5), HafenCity, Hamburg (6-12 stories, mixed uses, FAR 2.5-4.0) |
Typology Selection Decision Tree:
- What is the target FAR? Below 1.0: Villa/Garden or Row/Terrace. 1.0-2.5: Courtyard or Mansion Block. 2.5-5.0: Perimeter Block or Hybrid. Above 5.0: Tower-Podium or Superblock.
- What is the desired street character? Strong enclosure: Perimeter, Row/Terrace, Mansion Block. Open landscape: Superblock, Villa/Garden, Campus. Mixed: Hybrid.
- What is the climate zone? Hot-arid: Courtyard Block (shaded interiors). Tropical: Tower-Podium or Superblock (ventilation). Temperate: Perimeter or Mansion. Cold: Perimeter (wind protection) or Campus (sheltered courtyards).
- What are the parking constraints? Below-grade: any typology. Podium parking: Tower-Podium. Rear court: Perimeter, Row/Terrace. Surface: Villa/Garden, Campus.
For complete specifications of each typology with plan dimensions, section descriptions, advantages, disadvantages, and detailed precedent data, see block-typologies.md.
Density Calculation Methodology
Follow this step-by-step procedure for any density calculation task. Each step builds on the previous one;
do not skip steps or apply shortcut multipliers without understanding the full chain.
Step 1: Establish Gross Site Area
Measure or confirm the total site boundary area in square meters (m2) or hectares (ha). 1 hectare = 10,000 m2.
Step 2: Deduct Public Infrastructure
Subtract the area consumed by streets, public open spaces, and infrastructure easements from gross site area.
- Typical street/infrastructure deduction: 25-35% of gross site area
- Low-density suburban: 20-25% (wider lots, fewer streets)
- Mid-density urban: 25-30% (regular grid, local streets)
- High-density urban: 30-35% (frequent intersections, small blocks, more street area)
- Result = Net Developable Area
Step 3: Calculate Building Footprint
Net Developable Area x Site Coverage Ratio = Building Footprint Area
- Site Coverage Ratio varies by typology (see matrix above: 25-75%)
Step 4: Calculate Gross Floor Area (GFA)
Building Footprint x Number of Floors = Gross Floor Area (GFA)
- If building heights vary across the site, calculate GFA for each building or zone separately and sum
- GFA includes all enclosed floor area measured to the outside face of external walls
Step 5: Calculate Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
FAR = Total GFA / Gross Site Area
- Note: FAR is always calculated against gross site area (including streets), not net developable area
- This is the single most important density metric; verify it against zoning allowance
Step 6: Calculate Net Internal Area (NIA)
GFA x Efficiency Ratio = Net Internal Area (NIA)
- Efficiency Ratio (also called Net-to-Gross ratio): the proportion of GFA that is usable floor area
- Typical efficiency ratios by building type:
- Walk-up apartments (no corridors): 0.85-0.90
- Corridor apartments (double-loaded): 0.75-0.82
- Single-loaded corridor apartments: 0.65-0.72
- Tower apartments (central core): 0.70-0.78
- Office buildings: 0.80-0.85 (NIA/GIA)
- Retail: 0.85-0.90
Step 7: Calculate Dwelling Count
NIA (residential portion) / Average Unit Size = Number of Dwelling Units
- Average unit size varies by market and unit mix:
- Studio/1-bed: 35-55 m2
- 2-bed: 65-85 m2
- 3-bed: 90-120 m2
- Family/4-bed: 120-160 m2
- Weighted average for mixed development: typically 70-95 m2
Step 8: Calculate Density Metrics
- Net Residential Density = Dwelling Units / Net Developable Area (in hectares) = DU/ha (net)
- Gross Residential Density = Dwelling Units / Gross Site Area (in hectares) = DU/ha (gross)
- Population = Dwelling Units x Average Household Size (typically 2.1-3.5 persons depending on market)
- Population Density = Population / Gross Site Area (in hectares) = persons/ha
Worked Example: 2-Hectare Mixed-Use Site
| Parameter | Value | Calculation |
|---|
| Gross Site Area | 20,000 m2 (2.0 ha) | Given |
| Street/infrastructure deduction | 30% | Typical urban |
| Net Developable Area | 14,000 m2 (1.4 ha) | 20,000 x 0.70 |
| Site Coverage Ratio | 60% | Perimeter block typology |
| Building Footprint | 8,400 m2 | 14,000 x 0.60 |
| Average Floors | 5 stories | Perimeter block, 4-6 range |
| Gross Floor Area (GFA) | 42,000 m2 | 8,400 x 5 |
| FAR | 2.10 | 42,000 / 20,000 |
| Residential proportion | 75% | Mixed-use (25% commercial/retail) |
| Residential GFA | 31,500 m2 | 42,000 x 0.75 |
| Efficiency ratio | 0.78 | Corridor apartments |
| Net Internal Area (residential) | 24,570 m2 | 31,500 x 0.78 |
| Average unit size | 80 m2 | Weighted mix of 1/2/3-bed |
| Dwelling Units | 307 units | 24,570 / 80 |
| Average household size | 2.3 persons | Urban market assumption |
| Population | 706 persons | 307 x 2.3 |
| Net Density | 219 DU/ha | 307 / 1.4 |
| Gross Density | 154 DU/ha | 307 / 2.0 |
| Population Density | 353 persons/ha | 706 / 2.0 |
For complete density metrics definitions, jurisdiction variations, conversion tables, and 15+ exemplar neighborhood profiles, see density-metrics.md.
For step-by-step FAR calculation examples across five different site scenarios, GFA measurement conventions by jurisdiction, and bonus FAR mechanisms, see far-calculations.md.
Block Design Rules
Apply these rules to every block design task. They represent the synthesis of global best practice,
empirical research, and regulatory standards from leading urban jurisdictions.
Block Size and Perimeter
- Minimum block perimeter: 250m (below this, blocks become inefficient with excessive street area relative to usable land)
- Optimal block perimeter: 400m (ITDP TOD Standard 3.0 gold standard)
- Maximum block perimeter: 500m (above this, walking distances become excessive and pedestrian convenience declines)
- Rule of thumb: target block dimensions of 60-80m x 80-120m for optimal balance of street connectivity and developable depth
- Elongated blocks: acceptable up to 200m in length if mid-block connections are provided (see below)
- Square blocks: work well at 80-100m per side; below 60m, corner lots consume too much frontage relative to block area
Mid-Block Pedestrian Connections
- On any block face exceeding 120m in length, provide at least one mid-block pedestrian passage
- Ideal spacing for mid-block connections: every 60-80m along long block faces
- Minimum passage width: 3m (clear width, unobstructed)
- Preferred passage width: 4-6m (allows daylight, planting, seating)
- Passages should be publicly accessible, well-lit (minimum 50 lux at ground level), and visually permeable from both ends (sightlines through the passage)
- Passages can be open-air (preferred) or covered (arcades); avoid tunnels under buildings longer than 15m unless well-lit and activated
Courtyard Dimensions and Daylight
- Minimum courtyard dimension: 21m in the narrowest direction (BRE daylight standard, ensures adequate daylight to lowest floors at temperate latitudes)
- Preferred courtyard dimension: 25-30m (allows generous daylight, usable open space, and mature tree planting)
- 45-degree rule: building height surrounding the courtyard should not exceed the courtyard width; ideally the courtyard width equals or exceeds the height of the tallest surrounding building face
- Orientation: where possible, open the courtyard to the south (northern hemisphere) or orient the lowest building wing on the south side to maximize solar access to the courtyard floor
- Courtyard uses: communal gardens, children's play, seating, bicycle parking, waste collection (screened), emergency access
Privacy Distances
- Window-to-window (habitable rooms facing habitable rooms): minimum 18-22m depending on jurisdiction
- UK standard: 21m (front-to-front, habitable rooms)
- German standard: 18m (1.0H rule, where H = building height, minimum 18m)
- Singapore URA: 24m (between residential towers above 12 stories)
- Window-to-blank wall: minimum 12-15m
- Overlooking angle: windows should not have direct sightlines into neighboring habitable rooms at an angle less than 45 degrees from the perpendicular
- Staggering and offsetting: where minimum distances cannot be achieved, offset window positions or use oblique building angles to eliminate direct sightlines
Parking Integration
- Below-grade parking (preferred): most urban solution; preserves ground-level space for active uses; expensive (typically $30,000-60,000 per space); requires structural considerations; limit to 2 basement levels to control cost and groundwater issues
- Podium parking: efficient (semi-automated systems possible); screen with active uses on street-facing facades; limit podium to 2-3 levels with habitable space above; provide green courtyard on podium roof
- Courtyard parking: acceptable for low-density blocks; must be screened from public view by gates, planting, or building wings; limit to visitor and disabled parking in urban blocks
- On-street parking: parallel parking on local streets (2.4m wide); angled parking on wider streets (5.0m deep at 60 degrees); contributes to traffic calming; do not rely solely on on-street parking for resident needs
- Parking ratios: vary by context from 0.0 spaces/unit (car-free developments near transit) to 2.0 spaces/unit (suburban); best practice urban: 0.5-1.0 spaces/unit with unbundled pricing
Servicing and Access
- Provide rear access lanes (minimum 6m wide for refuse vehicles) or shared courtyard access for waste collection, deliveries, and emergency vehicles
- Do not route servicing through the primary street frontage; keep service entrances on secondary frontages or within the block interior
- Waste collection points: within 30m carry distance of all units; screened from public view; adequate ventilation
- Delivery and move-in access: at least one vehicular access point per block with vertical clearance of 4.0m minimum
Variation and Visual Interest
- Height variation: vary building height by 1-2 stories within a single block to create a varied roofline and avoid monotony; place taller elements at corners and key frontages
- Setback variation: introduce shallow recesses (1-2m) or projections (bay windows, balconies) along the street facade at intervals of 15-25m to break up the building mass
- Facade rhythm: vary facade materials, window patterns, entrance locations, and balcony positions; aim for identifiable "addresses" within continuous building frontages
- Avoid monolithic blocks: blocks exceeding 80m of continuous facade should be subdivided into visually distinct building segments with different architects or design languages (Barcelona, Amsterdam, and Hamburg HafenCity all mandate this)
Corner Buildings
- Corner buildings occupy the most visible position in any block and require special design treatment
- Height: corners may be 1-2 stories taller than the typical block height to create landmarks and mark intersections
- Ground floor: commercial or civic uses at corners (cafes, retail, community spaces) to activate the intersection
- Architecture: enhanced architectural treatment (chamfered corners as in Barcelona Eixample, turrets, double-height ground floors, pronounced entrances)
- Setbacks: consider chamfered corners (3-5m cut at 45 degrees) or curved corners for pedestrian visibility and wider sidewalk space at intersections
Height-Density Relationship
Building height and site coverage are inversely related for any given FAR. The same density can be achieved
through multiple height-coverage combinations, each producing radically different urban characters. Use the
following matrix to evaluate trade-offs and select the appropriate combination for any given design context.
Trade-Off Matrix
| Target FAR | Option A (Low-Rise, High-Coverage) | Option B (Mid-Rise, Medium-Coverage) | Option C (High-Rise, Low-Coverage) |
|---|
| 1.0 | 2 stories, 50% coverage | 4 stories, 25% coverage | 10 stories, 10% coverage |
| 2.0 | 2 stories, 100% coverage | 4 stories, 50% coverage | 8 stories, 25% coverage |
| 3.0 | 3 stories, 100% coverage | 6 stories, 50% coverage | 10 stories, 30% coverage |
| 4.0 | 4 stories, 100% coverage | 8 stories, 50% coverage | 16 stories, 25% coverage |
| 5.0 | 5 stories, 100% coverage | 10 stories, 50% coverage | 20 stories, 25% coverage |
| 8.0 | 8 stories, 100% coverage | 16 stories, 50% coverage | 32 stories, 25% coverage |
| 12.0 | Not feasible at low-rise | 20 stories, 60% coverage | 40 stories, 30% coverage |
Analysis of Each Strategy
Low-Rise High-Coverage (Option A)
- Creates enclosed, intimate street spaces with strong sense of enclosure
- Maximum ground-floor activation and fine-grained frontage
- Courtyard spaces are small or non-existent at 100% coverage
- Limited daylight penetration to lower floors and interior spaces
- Best for: mixed-use high streets, row house neighborhoods, traditional urban fabric
- Practical ceiling: FAR 3.0-4.0 (above this, daylight becomes unacceptable)
Mid-Rise Medium-Coverage (Option B)
- Generally produces the best urban quality: strong street enclosure (4-8 stories at 50-65% coverage), generous courtyards, good daylight, usable open space
- Aligns with Christopher Alexander's 4-story limit (Pattern 21) for human connection to ground
- Efficient building typologies: double-loaded corridor apartments, perimeter blocks, courtyard blocks
- Good balance of density, livability, construction cost, and infrastructure efficiency
- Best for: most urban neighborhoods, transit-oriented development, European-style urbanity
- Sweet spot: FAR 2.0-5.0 at 4-8 stories with 50-65% coverage
High-Rise Low-Coverage (Option C)
- Creates open landscape between towers with generous ground-level open space
- Weak street enclosure: buildings read as objects in space rather than defining spatial boundaries
- Can feel windswept, exposed, and lacking intimate human-scale spaces at ground level
- Wind turbulence around tower bases requires mitigation (canopies, planting, screens)
- Higher construction cost per m2 (structural premium above 8-10 stories, elevator systems, fire safety)
- Best for: parks and waterfronts (towers emerging from landscape), tropical climates (ventilation), very high FAR targets (above 8.0)
- Caution: avoid isolated towers on podiums without a broader urban strategy for ground-level enclosure and activation
Key Insight
For FAR targets between 2.0 and 5.0, mid-rise at 50-65% coverage consistently outperforms both low-rise and high-rise strategies on combined measures of:
- Urban spatial quality (enclosure ratio)
- Daylight to dwellings (vertical sky component)
- Usable open space (courtyard area)
- Construction efficiency (cost per m2 of GFA)
- Energy performance (reduced heat loss from compact form)
- Social sustainability (connection to ground, neighborly interaction, community building)
Daylight and Solar Access
Adequate daylight and solar access are non-negotiable requirements for residential block design. Failure to
achieve minimum daylight standards produces uninhabitable dwellings, legal liability, and unmarketable units.
Apply these standards rigorously.
Solar Envelope Methodology
The solar envelope defines the maximum building volume on a site that will not cast shadows on neighboring
properties beyond an agreed threshold. It is defined by:
- Target date: typically the winter solstice (worst case) or equinox (design case)
- Target time window: typically 4 hours of direct sun on neighboring facades/open spaces between 10:00 and 14:00
- Neighboring sensitive receivers: residential windows, public open spaces, school playgrounds
- The solar envelope is generated by projecting sun vectors from the boundaries of neighboring sensitive receivers backward to the site at the critical sun angles
BRE Daylight Standards (Building Research Establishment, UK)
- Daylight Factor (DF): the ratio of indoor illuminance to outdoor illuminance under overcast skies
- Minimum 2% DF for habitable rooms (living rooms, bedrooms)
- Minimum 1.5% DF for kitchens
- Minimum 1% DF for bathrooms, hallways, and non-habitable rooms
- Vertical Sky Component (VSC): the amount of visible sky from the center of a window, measured as a percentage of an unobstructed hemisphere
- Minimum 27% VSC for windows to have adequate daylight
- If VSC falls below 27%, or below 0.8 times its former value after development, daylight is considered adversely affected
- No-Sky Line (NSL): the line within a room beyond which no sky is visible from the working plane (850mm above floor)
- At least 50% of the room area should be able to see sky from the working plane
- If NSL retreats so that less than 50% of the room can see sky, daylight is considered inadequate
Annual Probable Sunlight Hours (APSH)
- For windows facing within 90 degrees of due south:
- Minimum 25% of APSH over the whole year (minimum 1,486 hours equivalent)
- Minimum 5% of APSH during winter months (September 21 to March 21)
- If either threshold is not met, and the reduction is greater than 20% of the former value, sunlight amenity is considered adversely affected
Shadow Casting Rules of Thumb
At a given latitude, the length of shadow cast by a building varies with the sun's altitude angle:
- Shadow length = Building height / tan(sun altitude angle)
- At 45 degrees latitude (approximate for Milan, Montreal, Portland):
- Equinox noon (March/September 21): shadow length approximately equals building height (sun altitude approximately 45 degrees)
- Summer solstice noon (June 21): shadow length approximately 0.5x building height (sun altitude approximately 68 degrees)
- Winter solstice noon (December 21): shadow length approximately 2.7x building height (sun altitude approximately 21 degrees)
- At 52 degrees latitude (approximate for London, Berlin, Amsterdam):
- Winter solstice noon: shadow length approximately 3.5x building height (sun altitude approximately 15 degrees)
- At 35 degrees latitude (approximate for Tokyo, Los Angeles, Casablanca):
- Winter solstice noon: shadow length approximately 1.7x building height (sun altitude approximately 32 degrees)
Minimum Spacing for Solar Access
To ensure direct sunlight reaches ground-level spaces (courtyards, streets, neighboring facades) for a target number of hours:
- Spacing = Building height / tan(sun altitude at target date and time)
- For a 6-story building (20m height) at 52 degrees latitude (London), winter solstice noon:
- Spacing = 20m / tan(15 degrees) = 20 / 0.268 = 75m for noon sunlight to reach ground level
- This is why London's courtyard blocks have minimum 21m courtyards but rely on sky light rather than direct winter sun
- For a 6-story building (20m height) at 35 degrees latitude (Los Angeles), winter solstice noon:
- Spacing = 20m / tan(32 degrees) = 20 / 0.625 = 32m for noon sunlight to reach ground level
- Much more achievable; direct winter sun is realistic for courtyard design at lower latitudes
Practical Design Implications
- Orient long building axes east-west where possible so that the south-facing facade receives maximum solar exposure and the north-facing facade (which receives no direct sun in northern latitudes) faces the street or other buildings
- Step down building height toward the south (in northern hemisphere) to avoid overshadowing shorter buildings and open spaces to the north
- At temperate and cold latitudes (above 45 degrees), do not rely on direct winter sunlight for courtyard amenity; design courtyards for sky daylight using the VSC and daylight factor approach rather than direct sun
- At tropical and warm latitudes (below 35 degrees), solar access is less of a constraint; the primary concern shifts to shading and preventing overheating; orient buildings and courtyards for ventilation rather than sun access
- Use daylight simulation software (Radiance, DIVA, Ladybug/Honeybee, Velux Daylight Visualizer) to validate daylight performance for any building deeper than 14m or any courtyard narrower than 25m
Output Format
When generating a block design recommendation, present the following block specification template
with all metrics filled in. Adapt the template to the specific typology and site conditions.
Block Specification Template
BLOCK SPECIFICATION
=====================================
Block ID: [identifier]
Typology: [from typology matrix]
Location / Context: [site description]
PLAN DIMENSIONS
Block width: [m]
Block length: [m]
Block perimeter: [m]
Block area: [m2]
BUILDING CONFIGURATION
Building depth: [m] (typically 12-18m)
Coverage ratio: [%]
Building footprint: [m2]
Number of floors: [stories]
Floor-to-floor: [m] (typically 3.0-3.5m residential, 4.0-4.5m ground floor)
Building height: [m]
Total GFA: [m2]
OPEN SPACE
Courtyard width: [m]
Courtyard area: [m2]
Open space ratio: [%]
DENSITY METRICS
FAR: [ratio]
Net density: [DU/ha]
Gross density: [DU/ha]
Dwelling units: [count]
Population: [persons]
DAYLIGHT PERFORMANCE
Min courtyard VSC: [%]
Daylight factor: [% average]
Shadow length (winter solstice noon): [m]
GROUND FLOOR
Active frontage: [% of street-facing perimeter]
Commercial area: [m2]
Entrance spacing: [m] (target every 8-12m)
PARKING
Strategy: [below-grade / podium / courtyard / on-street]
Spaces: [count]
Ratio: [spaces per unit]
SERVICING
Access: [rear lane / courtyard / internal road]
Waste collection: [strategy]
DESIGN NOTES
[Typology-specific notes, climate considerations,
special design treatments, variation strategy]
=====================================
Provide the completed template together with a brief narrative explaining the design rationale,
key trade-offs made, and how the block relates to the broader urban context (street network,
adjacent blocks, public space framework).
Reference Links
For detailed typological specifications, precedent data, dimensional standards, and design checklists, consult
the following reference documents within this skill:
-
Block Typologies Reference: block-typologies.md
12+ typologies with full specifications, dimensional plans, section descriptions, courtyard character,
parking strategies, ground floor treatments, advantages/disadvantages, and 3-5 precedent projects per type.
-
Density Metrics Reference: density-metrics.md
Complete measurement guide covering FAR/FSI/Plot Ratio, coverage ratios, net vs gross density,
DU/ha, persons/ha, bedspaces/ha, habitable rooms/ha. Conversion tables and density profiles
of 15+ exemplar neighborhoods worldwide from Barcelona Eixample to Freiburg Vauban.
-
FAR Calculations Reference: far-calculations.md
Step-by-step worked examples for 5 site scenarios (single-use residential, mixed-use tower-podium,
multi-block district, infill development, TOD with bonus FAR). GFA measurement conventions by
jurisdiction (US BOMA, UK GIA/NIA, Singapore, Hong Kong). Bonus FAR mechanisms for affordable
housing, green building, public amenity, and heritage transfer of development rights.
-
Urban Design Foundations: See the urban-design-foundations skill for core theorists, quantitative
rules of thumb, movement frameworks, and design quality criteria that provide the broader context
for block design decisions.
-
Urban Calculator: See the urban-calculator skill for Python scripts that compute density,
FAR, walkability, parking, green space, and block optimization metrics programmatically.
External References
