cui-documentation

name	cui-documentation
description	General documentation standards for README, AsciiDoc, and technical documentation
allowed-tools	["Read","Edit","Write","Bash","Grep","Glob"]

CUI Documentation Skill

Standards for writing clear, maintainable technical documentation in CUI projects.

Note: This skill covers general documentation. For code documentation, use:

• cui-javadoc for Java code documentation
• cui-frontend-development/jsdoc-standards.md for JavaScript documentation

Workflow

Step 1: Load Applicable Documentation Standards

CRITICAL: Load current documentation standards based on context.

1. Always load core documentation standards:

   Read: standards/documentation-core.md
   

2. Conditional loading based on context:

   • If creating or editing README files:

     Read: standards/readme-structure.md
     

   • If working with AsciiDoc files:

     Read: standards/asciidoc-formatting.md
     

   • If reviewing tone, style, or language (or comprehensive reviews):

     Read: standards/tone-and-style.md
     

   • If organizing, restructuring, or reviewing documentation structure:

     Read: standards/organization-standards.md
     

3. Extract key requirements from all loaded standards

4. Store in working memory for use during task execution

Step 2: Analyze Existing Documentation

When to Execute: After loading standards

What to Analyze:

1. General Documentation Quality:

   • Check tone and style (see documentation-core.md for requirements)
   • Verify no marketing language or promotional wording
   • Validate factual descriptions with sources
   • Review technical precision
   • Check for conciseness and clarity

2. Tone and Style (if tone-and-style.md loaded):

   • Identify marketing language and subjective claims
   • Check for qualification patterns ("production-proven", "extensively tested")
   • Verify no transitional markers (status indicators, TODO items)
   • Ensure objective vs subjective language compliance
   • Review for promotional wording and self-praise
   • Validate all claims are verifiable or attributed

3. Organization and Structure (if organization-standards.md loaded):

   • Verify document follows single-aspect principle
   • Check document size (50-400 lines)
   • Validate file naming (kebab-case)
   • Identify duplicate content across documents
   • Check for transitional/status markers
   • Assess cross-reference integrity
   • Review logical document organization

4. AsciiDoc Format (if .adoc files):

   • Verify document header with required attributes
   • Check cross-reference syntax (xref: format)
   • CRITICAL: Validate blank lines before all lists
   • Review code block formatting with language specification
   • Check section hierarchy and numbering

5. README Structure (if README files):

   • Verify title and description
   • Check Maven coordinates placement
   • Review core concepts section
   • Validate usage examples completeness
   • Check configuration documentation
   • Review best practices section

6. Content Quality:

   • Only existing code/features documented
   • All references verified to exist
   • RFC references must be relevant (see documentation-core.md for verification requirements)
   • Consistent terminology used
   • Code examples from unit tests
   • All public APIs documented

Step 3: Apply Documentation Standards

When to Execute: During documentation creation or review

What to Apply:

1. Core Documentation Principles:

   • Professional, neutral, objective tone
   • No marketing or promotional language
   • Technical precision with verifiable sources
   • Concise, clear language
   • Document only existing features
   • Use linking instead of duplication

2. AsciiDoc Formatting (if .adoc files):

   README Files (README.adoc, */README.adoc):

   • Use :toc: macro (NOT :toc: left)
   • Place toc::[] manually where TOC should appear
   • Example header:

     = Module Name
     :toc: macro
     :toclevels: 3
     :sectnums:
     :source-highlighter: highlight.js
     
     Brief module description.
     
     toc::[]
     
     == Core Concepts
     

   General Documentation Files (not READMEs):

   • Use :toc: left for automatic left sidebar TOC
   • Do NOT use :toc: macro
   • Example header:

     = Document Title
     :toc: left
     :toclevels: 3
     :toc-title: Table of Contents
     :sectnums:
     :source-highlighter: highlight.js
     

   All AsciiDoc Files:

   • Use xref:path/to/file.adoc[Link Text] for cross-references
   • ALWAYS add blank line before lists
   • Specify language in code blocks
   • Follow proper section hierarchy

3. README Structure (if README files):

   • Title and brief description
   • Maven coordinates immediately after description
   • Core Concepts section
   • Detailed Component Documentation with links to source
   • Usage Examples (complete, working code)
   • Configuration section
   • Best Practices
   • Technical Details
   • Related Documentation

4. Code Examples:

   • Must be complete and compilable (see documentation-core.md for requirements)
   • Include all necessary imports
   • Show proper error handling
   • Follow project coding standards
   • Be verified by unit tests
   • Use clear variable names
   • Include comments for complex steps
   • Configuration placeholders must be clearly identified

Step 4: Verify Documentation Quality

When to Execute: After creating or updating documentation

Quality Checks:

1. Tone and Style Verification:

   • Professional, neutral tone
   • No marketing language
   • Factual descriptions
   • Technical precision
   • Concise language

2. AsciiDoc Format Verification (if .adoc):

   • Document header complete
   • Cross-references use xref: syntax
   • Blank lines before all lists
   • Code blocks have language specification
   • Section hierarchy correct

3. README Structure Verification (if README):

   • Title and description present
   • Maven coordinates included
   • Core concepts documented
   • Usage examples complete
   • Configuration documented
   • Best practices included

4. Content Quality Verification:

   • Only existing features documented
   • All references verified
   • Consistent terminology
   • Code examples from tests
   • All public APIs documented

5. Build Verification (if applicable):

   # Verify documentation builds successfully
   mvn clean install -DskipTests
   

Step 5: Automated Validation (AsciiDoc)

When to Execute: After creating or updating AsciiDoc files

Available Validation Scripts:

This skill includes two validation scripts in the scripts/ directory:

1. asciidoc-validator.sh - Format validation script

   • Validates AsciiDoc format compliance
   • Checks for blank lines before lists
   • Verifies section header formatting
   • Detects list syntax issues

   Usage:

   # Validate a single file
   scripts/asciidoc-validator.sh path/to/file.adoc
   
   # Validate all files in a directory
   scripts/asciidoc-validator.sh directory/
   

2. verify-adoc-links.py - Link verification script

   • Validates cross-reference links
   • Checks for broken file references
   • Verifies anchor existence
   • Detects deprecated syntax

   Usage:

   # Verify links in a single file
   python3 scripts/verify-adoc-links.py --file path/to/file.adoc --report target/links.md
   
   # Verify links in directory (non-recursive)
   python3 scripts/verify-adoc-links.py --directory directory/ --report target/links.md
   
   # Verify links recursively
   python3 scripts/verify-adoc-links.py --directory directory/ --recursive --report target/links.md
   

Validation Workflow:

1. Run format validation:

   scripts/asciidoc-validator.sh target_file_or_directory 2>&1
   

2. Run link verification:

   mkdir -p target/asciidoc-reviewer
   python3 scripts/verify-adoc-links.py --file target.adoc --report target/asciidoc-reviewer/links.md 2>&1
   

3. Distinguish link validation results:

   • Syntax Valid + Target Exists: ✅ Link is correct
   • Syntax Valid + Target Missing: ❌ Reference to non-existent file
     • Common cause: Documentation for planned/future features
     • Action: Either create the target document or remove the reference
     • Do NOT leave references to non-existent files
   • Syntax Invalid: ❌ Malformed cross-reference
     • Fix syntax to use proper xref:path[text] format

4. Review validation output and fix issues

5. Re-run validation to confirm fixes

Script Paths:

• Scripts are located in the skill directory at: scripts/asciidoc-validator.sh and scripts/verify-adoc-links.py
• When running from project root, use relative path from current working directory
• Scripts require execution from a location where relative paths to AsciiDoc files are correct

Step 6: Document Changes and Commit

When to Execute: After verification passes

Commit Standards:

• Follow standard commit message format
• Reference related issues
• Document significant documentation changes
• Add co-authored-by line for Claude Code

Common Documentation Patterns

AsciiDoc Document Header

= Document Title
:toc: left
:toclevels: 3
:toc-title: Table of Contents
:sectnums:
:source-highlighter: highlight.js

== Purpose
Brief description of the document's purpose.

== Related Documentation
* xref:other-document.adoc[Other Document]
* xref:../category/document.adoc[Category Document]

README Structure Example

= Module Name

Concise description of the module's purpose and key features.

== Maven Coordinates

[source, xml]
----
<dependency>
    <groupId>group.id</groupId>
    <artifactId>artifact-id</artifactId>
</dependency>
----

== Core Concepts

=== Feature One

* Capability details
* Integration points
* Key benefits

== Usage Examples

=== Basic Usage
[source,java]
----
// Complete code example
----

== Configuration

=== Property Configuration
[source,properties]
----
# Configuration examples
----

Code Block with Language

[source,java]
----
@Test
void shouldValidateToken() {
    // Test implementation
}
----

Error Prevention

Common Documentation Issues

1. Missing Blank Line Before List: AsciiDoc grammar requires blank line
2. Wrong Cross-Reference Syntax: Use xref: not link:
3. Missing Language Specification: Always specify language in code blocks
4. Marketing Language: Use neutral, factual descriptions
5. Incomplete Code Examples: Provide complete, compilable examples

Quality Violations

1. Promotional Tone: "Our amazing feature" → "Feature X provides..."
2. Incomplete Header: Missing required document attributes
3. Invalid References: Links to non-existent files
4. Speculative Documentation: Documenting planned features
5. Duplicate Content: Copy-paste instead of cross-reference

Quality Verification

All documentation must pass:

• Professional, neutral tone
• Proper AsciiDoc formatting
• Complete code examples
• Verified references
• Consistent terminology
• No marketing language
• Documents only existing features

References

All documentation standards are located in the standards/ directory:

• Core documentation principles: standards/documentation-core.md
• Tone and style requirements: standards/tone-and-style.md
• Organization and structure: standards/organization-standards.md
• AsciiDoc formatting guidelines: standards/asciidoc-formatting.md
• README structure patterns: standards/readme-structure.md