| name | firecrawl-search |
| description | Web search with full page content extraction. Use this skill whenever the user asks to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up, find recent news, discover sources, or says "search for", "find me", "look up", "what are people saying about", or "find articles about". Returns real search results with optional full-page markdown — not just snippets. Provides capabilities beyond Claude's built-in WebSearch.
|
| allowed-tools | ["Bash(firecrawl *)","Bash(npx firecrawl *)"] |
firecrawl search
Web search with optional content scraping. Returns search results as JSON, optionally with full page content.
When to use
- You don't have a specific URL yet
- You need to find pages, answer questions, or discover sources
- First step in the workflow escalation pattern: search → scrape → map → crawl → interact
Quick start
firecrawl search "your query" -o .firecrawl/result.json --json
firecrawl search "your query" --scrape -o .firecrawl/scraped.json --json
firecrawl search "your query" --sources news --tbs qdr:d -o .firecrawl/news.json --json
Options
| Option | Description |
|---|
--limit <n> | Max number of results |
--sources <web,images,news> | Source types to search |
--categories <github,research,pdf> | Filter by category |
--tbs <qdr:h|d|w|m|y> | Time-based search filter |
--location | Location for search results |
--country <code> | Country code for search |
--scrape | Also scrape full page content for each result |
--scrape-formats | Formats when scraping (default: markdown) |
-o, --output <path> | Output file path |
--json | Output as JSON |
Tips
--scrape fetches full content — don't re-scrape URLs from search results. This saves credits and avoids redundant fetches.
- Always write results to
.firecrawl/ with -o to avoid context window bloat.
- Use
jq to extract URLs or titles: jq -r '.data.web[].url' .firecrawl/search.json
- Naming convention:
.firecrawl/search-{query}.json or .firecrawl/search-{query}-scraped.json
Send feedback after every search (refunds 1 credit)
Search costs 2 credits. After you've actually used the results (or decided they were useless), send structured feedback with firecrawl search-feedback <id>. The first feedback per search refunds 1 credit and helps us improve search quality. Do this once per search, in the background, after you finish processing the results — it does not block your main task.
Opt out: if FIRECRAWL_NO_SEARCH_FEEDBACK=1 (or FIRECRAWL_DISABLE_SEARCH_FEEDBACK=1) is set, the CLI silently skips the call and never sends anything. Respect that — do not try to work around it. (Team admins can also disable this server-side; the API will return feedbackErrorCode: "TEAM_OPTED_OUT" and the CLI will exit 0 silently.)
Rules to know before you call this:
- Time window: must be sent within ~2 minutes of the search. Late feedback is rejected.
--missing-content is the most important field. It's a list of specific pieces of content you expected but did not find. One topic per entry — do not pack multiple topics into one string. These aggregate across teams and tell us what to index next.
- Substantive content required (zero-effort feedback is rejected with HTTP 400):
good → must include at least one --valuable-sources entry.
partial → must include --valuable-sources or --missing-content.
bad → must include --missing-content or --query-suggestions.
- Daily refund cap (per team, per UTC day, default 100 credits). Once your team has been refunded 100 credits today, further submissions still record feedback but no longer refund credits. The response includes
creditsRefundedToday / dailyRefundCap / dailyCapReached. When dailyCapReached: true, stop calling search-feedback for the rest of the UTC day — it won't refund anything and you're wasting bandwidth.
- Idempotent: re-submitting for the same search id returns success but no extra refund.
--silent & is the right pattern — exit code 0 even on failure, so a rejected/expired call never crashes your pipeline.
Read the search response's id:
SEARCH_ID=$(jq -r '.id' .firecrawl/search-react-hooks.json)
Then send feedback. Pick the rating that matches what actually happened:
firecrawl search-feedback "$SEARCH_ID" \
--rating good \
--valuable-sources '[{"url":"https://react.dev/reference/react/hooks","reason":"Most authoritative"}]' \
--missing-content '[
{"topic":"useDeferredValue","description":"No example of useDeferredValue with Suspense"},
{"topic":"useTransition","description":"No coverage of useTransition for routing"}
]' \
--query-suggestions "Boost react.dev for queries about react hooks" \
--silent &
firecrawl search-feedback "$SEARCH_ID" \
--rating partial \
--missing-content '[
{"topic":"useDeferredValue"},
{"topic":"useTransition","description":"Need React 18+ examples"},
{"topic":"Server Components hooks"}
]' \
--silent &
firecrawl search-feedback "$SEARCH_ID" \
--rating bad \
--missing-content "official api reference: missing v2 endpoints" \
--missing-content "code examples in python" \
--silent &
--missing-content accepts:
- JSON array of
{topic, description?} objects (richest, preferred)
"topic: description" strings (shorthand)
- Plain
"topic1, topic2, topic3" (when you only have topic names)
- Repeated
--missing-content flags
--silent suppresses output and & runs it in the background so feedback never blocks you.
See also