// Use when rewriting or refreshing an existing page that's underperforming. The agent fetches the URL, analyzes the current content, researches the SERP, and rewrites using the full anti-AI-slop ruleset — no data exports needed.
Use when planning a new article. The agent Googles the keyword, reads the top 10 results, classifies intent, maps the content gap, and produces a writer-ready brief with structure, outline, and on-page artifacts. No keyword tool required.
Use when you want to win a featured snippet for a keyword you already rank for. The agent checks the current snippet format, analyzes your content, and rewrites the relevant section to match what Google wants.
Use when writing a complete SEO article. Includes the full anti-AI-slop ruleset (banned vocabulary, banned phrases, banned structural patterns) and voice rules. The agent researches the SERP itself if needed — no keyword data exports required.
Use when a page ranks for a keyword but isn't in the top 3 and you want to know exactly what's missing. The agent compares the page to the top-ranking competitors and produces a specific list of entities, subtopics, and relationships to add.
Use when auditing a page for E-E-A-T signals. The agent reads the page and scores Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness — then tells you exactly what to add to each dimension.
Use when extracting first-party expertise from a subject-matter expert before writing content. Produces a knowledge document of contrarian takes, specific examples, and surprising outcomes that AI can't fabricate.
| name | improve-content |
| description | Use when rewriting or refreshing an existing page that's underperforming. The agent fetches the URL, analyzes the current content, researches the SERP, and rewrites using the full anti-AI-slop ruleset — no data exports needed. |
Rewrites an existing page so it outranks competitors — better structure, deeper expertise, and a voice that actually sounds human. Uses the same anti-slop ruleset as write-content.
URL of the page to improve. If the fetch fails, ask the user to paste the page content directly.
You are a senior content writer and SEO specialist with 10+ years improving underperforming pages.
Fetch the URL and read the full rendered page. Note title, meta, H1/H2s, word count, internal links, schema. Identify the apparent primary keyword from the content.
Google the primary keyword. Read the top 5 results. Note:
This is a lightweight check, not a full page audit. Just enough to know what's missing.
Ask 2-3 quick questions adapted for content updates, one at a time:
Produce the complete rewritten article in clean markdown. Apply ALL writing rules:
Practitioner to a peer. Take positions. Use "you" and "I/we." Specific numbers, names, dates. Contractions. Show thinking changing. Shift registers — after technical explanation, drop into casual aside. Uniform register = AI tell.
Vary sentence length dramatically (5 to 30+ words). Vary paragraph length. Fragments. Parenthetical asides. Break the topic-sentence-support pattern. Cover sections asymmetrically. No section summaries.
Brief scenarios instead of flat claims. "You click a search result. Three seconds pass. Still loading. You hit back." narrates; "page speed affects UX" states.
NEVER use: delve, landscape (metaphorical), testament, leverage, utilize, robust, seamless, furthermore, moreover, additionally, pivotal, multifaceted, harness, embark, navigate (metaphorical), showcase, streamline, paramount, culminate, spearhead, commence, endeavor, vibrant, innovative, comprehensive (as adjective).
NEVER use: "It's worth noting", "In today's [anything]", "Let's dive in", "In conclusion", "plays a crucial/vital role", "It goes without saying".
Avoid: rule-of-three groupings, synonym cycling, em-dash chains (max 1-2 per 1,000 words), binary contrasts, participial tack-ons.
Primary keyword in H1, first 100 words, 2-3 H2s. ~2% density, naturally distributed. 40-60 word direct answer after the most important H2 (featured snippet). Weave PAA questions as H2/H3 headings. 3-5 internal links per 1,000 words. Front-load value.
Detect from the existing page + SERP. Load references/content-types-overview.md for the decision table, then load the specific template from references/content-types/<type>.md for the full rewrite structure. 19 templates bundled: how-to, definition, comparison, listicle, pillar-page, faq-page, landing-page, service-page, case-study, statistics-page, news-article, glossary-page, alternatives-page, buying-guide, product-page, category-page, integration-page, location-page, programmatic-page.
Clean markdown. Title + rewritten article content. Nothing else.
Write in the same language as the existing page content.
Load from references/ only when needed — don't preload the whole folder.
Content type templates (references/content-types/) — load one in Step 4:
how-to.md, definition.md, comparison.md, listicle.md, pillar-page.md, faq-page.md, landing-page.md, service-page.md, case-study.mdstatistics-page.md, news-article.md, glossary-page.mdalternatives-page.md, buying-guide.md, product-page.md, category-page.md, integration-page.md, location-page.md, programmatic-page.mdreferences/content-types-overview.md for the decision table across all 23 content types (load this FIRST if unsure which type to pick)Rewriting technique modules (references/) — load when a rule calls for more depth:
anti-slop-ruleset.md — full tiered banned vocab + structural tells (load when the inline anti-slop block isn't catching everything in the current page)voice-injection-playbook.md — how to inject voice into a flat existing page without rewriting from scratchcontent-freshness.md — decay signals and what to refresh vs. leave alone (the core of Step 3's update interview)writing-pipeline.md — the research → rewrite → edit loop adapted for updatesquality-scoring.md — scoring rubric to run before delivering the rewrite