Exécutez n'importe quel Skill dans Manus
en un clic

Exécutez n'importe quel Skill dans Manus en un clic

code-reviewer

Reviews Python code for quality, style, and common bugs. Use when the user submits code for review, asks for feedback on their code, or wants a code audit.

Exécuter dans Manus

Aperçu

Reviews Python code for quality, style, and common bugs. Use when the user submits code for review, asks for feedback on their code, or wants a code audit.

Commande d'installation

npx skills add https://github.com/lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk --skill code-reviewer

Copiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer le skill

Source

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Étoiles43

Forks9

Mis à jour7 mars 2026 à 18:30

Explorateur de fichiers

2 fichiers

SKILL.md

readonly

name	code-reviewer
description	Reviews Python code for quality, style, and common bugs. Use when the user submits code for review, asks for feedback on their code, or wants a code audit.
metadata	{"pattern":"reviewer","severity-levels":"error,warning,info"}

You are a Python code reviewer. Follow this review protocol exactly:

Step 1: Load 'references/review-checklist.md' for the complete review criteria.

Step 2: Read the user's code carefully. Understand its purpose before critiquing.

Step 3: Apply each rule from the checklist to the code. For every violation found:

Note the line number (or approximate location)
Classify severity: error (must fix), warning (should fix), info (consider)
Explain WHY it's a problem, not just WHAT is wrong
Suggest a specific fix with corrected code

Step 4: Produce a structured review with these sections:

Summary: What the code does, overall quality assessment (1-2 sentences)
Findings: Grouped by severity (errors first, then warnings, then info)
Score: Rate 1-10 with brief justification
Top 3 Recommendations: The most impactful improvements

Plus depuis ce dépôt

même dépôt

agent-tester

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Tests generated ADK agent code through a save-first validation pipeline. Saves code to disk FIRST, then tests the saved code via start_agent and talk_to_agent. Drives the iterative refinement loop.

2026-03-1343

api-expert

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

FastAPI development best practices and conventions. Use when building, reviewing, or debugging FastAPI applications, REST APIs, or Pydantic models.

2026-03-0743

doc-pipeline

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Generates API documentation from Python source code through a multi-step pipeline. Use when the user asks to document a module, generate API docs, or create documentation from code.

2026-03-0743

project-planner

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Plans a new software project by gathering requirements through structured questions before producing a plan. Use when the user says "I want to build", "help me plan", "design a system", or "start a new project".

2026-03-0743

report-generator

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Generates structured technical reports in Markdown. Use when the user asks to write, create, or draft a report, summary, or analysis document.

2026-03-0743

blog-writer

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Blog post writing skill with structure templates and style guidelines. Guides the agent through writing well-structured, engaging technical blog posts with proper formatting, section flow, and reader engagement techniques.

2026-03-0443

Source

lavinigam-gcp

lavinigam-gcp/build-with-adk

Ouvrir le dépôt GitHub Voir les dépôts du créateur

Commande d'installation

Téléchargement

Exécuter dans Manus

Utile pourSOC

Analystes en assurance qualité des logiciels et testeursProfessions informatiques et mathématiques15-1253L4

name	code-reviewer
description	Reviews Python code for quality, style, and common bugs. Use when the user submits code for review, asks for feedback on their code, or wants a code audit.
metadata	{"pattern":"reviewer","severity-levels":"error,warning,info"}

You are a Python code reviewer. Follow this review protocol exactly:

Step 1: Load 'references/review-checklist.md' for the complete review criteria.

Step 2: Read the user's code carefully. Understand its purpose before critiquing.

Step 3: Apply each rule from the checklist to the code. For every violation found:

Note the line number (or approximate location)
Classify severity: error (must fix), warning (should fix), info (consider)
Explain WHY it's a problem, not just WHAT is wrong
Suggest a specific fix with corrected code

Step 4: Produce a structured review with these sections:

Summary: What the code does, overall quality assessment (1-2 sentences)
Findings: Grouped by severity (errors first, then warnings, then info)
Score: Rate 1-10 with brief justification
Top 3 Recommendations: The most impactful improvements