| name | spread1000-research-planner |
| description | Formulates an AI for Science research plan. Proposes how to integrate AI into the
researcher's domain through web research and literature survey, and generates a
concrete 研究計画書 (research plan document).
Use when user doesn't know how to apply AI to their 研究テーマ (research theme),
wants to create a 研究プラン (research plan), or wants to learn about
AI for Science latest trends (最新動向).
|
Research Planner
Formulate the optimal AI-powered research plan for the researcher's domain.
Use This Skill When
- The research theme is decided but the user doesn't know how to leverage AI
- The user wants to survey AI for Science success stories and latest trends
- The user wants to create a 研究計画書 for SPReAD application
Required Inputs
- Researcher's domain (e.g., materials science, life science, meteorology)
- Research theme or problem overview
- Current research methods / data overview (optional)
Workflow
- Hearing: Confirm the researcher's field, theme, and current challenges
- Web Search (MCP: github-mcp-server) (primary broad survey):
Use the github-mcp-server search tools to gather a wide overview first:
- Latest AI for Science trends and success cases in the researcher's domain
- Azure AI Foundry model catalog (Aurora, MatterGen, BioEmu, Phi-4, etc.)
- Microsoft Research AI for Science pages
- JST site for latest SPReAD solicitation information
- Key conferences / journals (NeurIPS, ICML, Nature, Science, etc.) for recent highlights
Record all URLs, titles, and key findings from Web Search results.
- ToolUniverse MCP Research (detailed literature deep-dive — requires
tooluniverse MCP server):
Using keywords and gaps identified in Step 2, run targeted scientific database queries:
# Discover relevant tools for the research domain
find_tools("literature search AI for Science")
find_tools("<researcher's domain> database")
# Search literature for AI applications in the field
execute_tool("PubMed_search_articles",
{"query": "<domain> AI machine learning deep learning", "max_results": 10})
execute_tool("ArXiv_search_papers",
{"query": "<domain> AI for Science foundation model", "max_results": 10})
execute_tool("BioRxiv_search",
{"query": "<domain> AI", "max_results": 5}) # for life science
execute_tool("SemanticScholar_search_papers",
{"query": "AI for Science <domain> 2024 2025", "max_results": 10})
# Domain-specific database tools (examples — discover with find_tools first)
execute_tool("UniProt_search_proteins", ...) # life science / structural biology
execute_tool("ChEMBL_search_compounds", ...) # chemistry / drug discovery
execute_tool("PubChem_search", ...) # chemistry
execute_tool("ClinicalTrials_search", ...) # clinical research
execute_tool("EuropePMC_search", ...) # broader literature
If tooluniverse MCP is unavailable, document the reason and continue with Web Search results only.
- AI Strategy Formulation:
- Map AI methods to research challenges
- Clarify expected outcomes and breakthroughs
- Estimate required computational resources (GPU, storage, network, etc.)
- Research Plan Generation: Save as
output/{project-name}/phase0-research-plan.md
- Reuse
assets/research-plan-template.md when producing the research plan
- Section 4 (文献調査): Copy ToolUniverse execute_tool results verbatim — do NOT paraphrase or fill from memory
- Section 5 (関連事例): Select ≥3 papers from Section 4. Each entry must include DOI/URL and source tool name
- Review: Verify technical feasibility of the research plan
Deliverables
output/{project-name}/phase0-research-plan.md: AI-powered research plan (complete)
- Section 4「文献調査」: ToolUniverse クエリ記録 + 取得文献リスト(≥5 件、DOI/URL・取得元ツール必須)
- Section 5「関連事例」: Section 4 から選択した ≥3 件の先行研究(DOI/URL と関連性を明記)
output/{project-name}/phase0-research-survey.md: Literature & database research results summary
(Include ToolUniverse query results: paper titles, DOIs, key findings from PubMed/ArXiv/etc.)
Quality Gates
Gotchas
- AI method selection strongly depends on research data characteristics. Always confirm data format (images, time series, text, 3D structures, etc.)
- Do not reflect overblown expectations like "AI can do anything" in the research plan. Explicitly state technical constraints
- Compute resource estimates must be concretely calculated from training data size, model scale, and number of training iterations
- The appropriate framework (PyTorch/TensorFlow/JAX, etc.) varies by research field
Validation Loop
- Generate the research plan
- Check:
- Did ToolUniverse MCP return results? (If not, verify
tooluniverse server is running)
- Is the mapping between AI methods and research challenges logical?
- Are compute resource estimates realistic?
- Is the schedule feasible?
- Are citations traceable (DOI / URL)?
- If any check fails:
- Identify and fix the relevant section
- Obtain supplementary information via ToolUniverse or web research
- Re-verify
- Finalize deliverables only after all gates pass
ToolUniverse MCP Availability Check
Before starting Step 2, verify the MCP server is reachable:
- Call
list_tools or grep_tools("PubMed") to confirm ToolUniverse is active.
- If the call fails or the server is not configured, log a warning in the survey file
and proceed with web research as fallback.
- Never silently skip ToolUniverse — always document whether it was used.