en un clic
wiki-research-personal
Weekly research agent for
Menu
Weekly research agent for
Daily research agent for
Daily research agent for
Build, run, and secure Docker containers with current best practices. Use for Dockerfile review, multi-stage builds, Compose orchestration, image hardening, and CI/CD integration.
Operate GitHub repositories, workflows, and PRs efficiently. Use for Actions optimization, PR hygiene, repo maintenance, and team collaboration patterns.
Deploy, manage, and troubleshoot Kubernetes workloads. Use for manifest review, Helm chart validation, resource tuning, RBAC, and cluster operations.
Design and operate application observability with metrics, logs, traces, and alerts. Use for SLO definition, dashboard design, on-call runbooks, and incident response.
| name | wiki-research-personal |
| description | Weekly research agent for |
Process #personal items from the queue — travel, products, life planning, health, and anything not engineering or academic. Uses the 5-step loop tuned for practical decisions.
/app/data/vault/
If the topic is a single recommendation you need (a hotel, a specific product), do one web_search (engine brave) for recent reviews, run intelli_extract on the top result, write a one-paragraph page, stop. The full loop is for decisions with trade-offs.
Each step has a gate. Do not advance until the gate is met.
Before searching, write three sentences:
Gate: a reader could list the criteria the decision will be judged on.
Identify the 2–3 source types most likely to answer. For personal topics, priority order:
web_search engine brave, then intelli_extract on individual reviewswiki/index.md)Run 2–3 Brave queries with the criteria from Step 1 in mind. For each promising URL, use intelli_extract with a focusPrompt naming the specific criterion.
Gate: you can name at least one strong source per criterion.
Pull the answer from the triaged sources. For personal topics:
Gate: every claim has at least one source URL attached.
For every claim, assign one tier:
For any claim that drives a money or time decision (price, availability, schedule), run a second web_search to corroborate against an independent source.
Gate: every claim has a tier.
Write the wiki page. Lead with a recommendation or decision matrix if the topic is a choice. Append a Limitations section.
---
tags: [#personal]
last_researched: YYYY-MM-DD
---
# <Title>
> One-sentence summary.
## Define
- **Decision shape:** ...
- **Criteria:** ...
## Findings
### <Criterion 1>
- **FACT:** <claim> [^1]
### <Criterion 2>
- **FACT:** <claim> [^2]
- **LIKELY:** <claim>
### <Criterion 3>
...
## Recommendation / Trade-offs
If the topic is a choice: state the recommendation with conditions ("X if you prioritise A; Y if you prioritise B").
## Limitations
- What the sources did not cover
- Which claims were not independently verified
- Recency caveats — what's likely to have changed since the sources were written
## Sources
[^1]: <url> — accessed YYYY-MM-DD
[^2]: <url> — accessed YYYY-MM-DD
RESEARCH_QUEUE.md in the vault root.- [ ]) under ## #personal. If none, stop.wiki/index.md for an existing page. Update if found; otherwise create wiki/personal/<slug>.md.wiki/index.md.RESEARCH_QUEUE.md: - [x] + — researched YYYY-MM-DD.[x] items to ## Archive.wiki/log.md:
## [YYYY-MM-DD] ingest | research-queue #personal | <topics> → <pages>
raw/, Openclaw articles/, or personal stuff/.wiki/ and RESEARCH_QUEUE.md.[x] with — skipped: too vague, clarify topic.