citation-checker

name	citation-checker
description	Check whether claims are adequately supported by cited sources and flag weak or mismatched citations. Use when reviewing research or technical writing.

Citation Checker

Overview

Check whether claims are adequately supported by cited sources and flag weak or mismatched citations.

Core Workflow

1. Inspect the relevant diffs, configs, source files, or artifacts before forming a conclusion.
2. Compare the current state against repo conventions, expected guarantees, and known risk areas.
3. Prioritize the highest-impact gaps, regressions, or improvement opportunities instead of surface-level noise.
4. Recommend the smallest high-leverage changes and the checks that would validate them.

Deliver

• Ranked findings or improvement opportunities with clear evidence.
• The main risks, tradeoffs, or regressions that matter most.
• Validation steps or follow-up edits that would reduce risk.

Guardrails

• Lead with findings, not generic praise or low-value commentary.
• Use repo evidence and surrounding context instead of reviewing in isolation.
• Flag missing validation when a recommendation depends on behavior you could not confirm.
• Do not fabricate citations, sources, or evidence; keep claims tied to the provided material.