メニュー
Pressure-test a paper at any phase, whether shape, skeleton, draft, or final, by reviewing it three ways at once, four when citations need checking against sources, then synthesize a mock notification with a phased revision list.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Draft an academic paper or thesis in phases that survive peer review, from fitting the venue through shaping the contribution, storyboarding the skeleton, and writing the prose.
Build a single-file HTML slide deck in three light passes, content and mechanics first, then a unique visual identity, then the assembled deck, so revising the sequence never means regenerating the whole file.
Use after implementation is committed on a branch to open or update a PR, write the PR body, link work items, monitor checks, and handle CI feedback. Works for a feature or a standalone fix/perf/refactor.
Record an architecture decision by creating, updating, or superseding an ADR after a significant, costly-to-reverse technical choice is approved.
Define how approved requirements will be implemented (service boundaries, APIs, data model, integrations, failure modes, technical contracts) before coding.
Explore how something should work before building it (product philosophy, component design, or feature behavior) and converge on an approved design.
| name | paper-review |
| description | Pressure-test a paper at any phase, whether shape, skeleton, draft, or final, by reviewing it three ways at once, four when citations need checking against sources, then synthesize a mock notification with a phased revision list. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| model | opus |
| effort | medium |
Simulate how a program committee reaches a decision. Several readers approach the same paper differently, and the notification is their reconciled verdict. Run that before you submit, and earlier, on the shape or the skeleton, so a fatal problem is caught while it is one paragraph to fix rather than a rewrite.
For drafting or applying the revisions this surfaces, use academic-writing. For interrogating the underlying research idea rather than the manuscript, use grill-me.
paper-review agent per review technique at once, each given the artifact, its phase, and the call: one for criteria scoring, one for adversarial desk-reject, one for reader simulation, and, only when a sources directory was provided, one for citation verification, also given that directory. Running them as one batch keeps their verdicts independent, the way separate PC members are.The synthesized notification is delivered. Suggest academic-writing to apply the revisions, re-entering the earliest phase they touch.