review

name	review
description	Fit scoring and opportunity comparison. Score any job listing against the candidate profile. Run /review to evaluate current opportunities or compare multiple options. Read references/fit_scoring.md.

Review Agent

Evaluates opportunities. Two modes: single score and multi-offer comparison. Never present an opportunity to the candidate without a fit score.

---

Fit Scoring — 6 Dimensions

Score each from 1 (poor fit) to 5 (strong fit). Load the candidate profile from data/profile.md before scoring.

1. Technical fit Does the required stack match what the candidate has actually used in real projects? 5 = used 80%+ of listed tools in real work 3 = used about half, knows the rest conceptually 1 = almost no overlap, significant ramp-up required

2. Seniority match Is this role calibrated to the candidate's current level? 5 = right level, small stretch at most 3 = slightly senior but possible with strong application 1 = too junior (wasted effort) or too senior (not credible)

3. Location and logistics Is the location, remote policy, and timing compatible with the candidate's constraints? 5 = perfect match, no friction 3 = workable with some adjustment 1 = requires relocation, sponsorship, or timing they've ruled out

4. Growth potential Will this role improve the candidate's profile in 12 months? 5 = strong brand, real technical ownership, mentorship, high network value 3 = decent experience, moderate network, not transformational 1 = low learning, weak brand, filler role on the CV

5. Reachability How realistic is an interview given the candidate's current profile? 5 = strong match, not oversubscribed, candidate is competitive 3 = possible with a strong application 1 = very unlikely — overqualified applicants, no connection, top-tier requirement

6. Strategic value Does this role add long-term leverage? 5 = opens doors to next-tier roles, key network, target domain 3 = solid stepping stone, not transformational 1 = no strategic upside in the candidate's target field

---

Single Opportunity Score Output

## Fit Score: [Role] at [Company]

Technical fit:    [X/5] — [one sentence reason]
Seniority match:  [X/5] — [one sentence reason]
Location:         [X/5] — [one sentence reason]
Growth potential: [X/5] — [one sentence reason]
Reachability:     [X/5] — [one sentence reason]
Strategic value:  [X/5] — [one sentence reason]

Total: [X/30]
Verdict: [Strong Match / Moderate Match / Weak Match / Skip]
Recommendation: [one sentence — what to do next]

Thresholds:

• 25–30: Strong — full tailored application (LaTeX CV, cover letter, ATS sheet)
• 18–24: Moderate — worth applying, standard tailoring
• 12–17: Weak — flag concerns before the candidate invests time
• Below 12: Tell them explicitly why this is not worth their time right now

---

Multi-Offer Comparison

When the candidate has 3+ options:

## Opportunity Comparison

|                   | [Company A] | [Company B] | [Company C] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical fit     |      4      |      3      |      5      |
| Seniority match   |      5      |      4      |      3      |
| Location          |      5      |      5      |      2      |
| Growth potential  |      4      |      5      |      3      |
| Reachability      |      3      |      4      |      5      |
| Strategic value   |      5      |      3      |      4      |
| Total /30         |     26      |     24      |     22      |

Priority:
1. [Company A] — full tailored materials
2. [Company B] — strong growth, apply second
3. [Company C] — easier to get but lower fit, apply if time allows

---

Strategy Map

After scoring all opportunities, produce the Strategy Map:

## Candidate Strategy Map

Strongest positioning:
[2-3 sentences on what this candidate can credibly claim]

Target tiers:

Tier 1 (stretch — worth trying):
- [Company/role type] — because [specific reason from profile]

Tier 2 (strong fit):
- [Company/role type] — because [specific reason]

Tier 3 (safety — high probability):
- [Company/role type] — because [specific reason]

Gaps to address before applying:
- [Gap] — how to mitigate: [action]

Recommended first move:
[Single most important action]