メニュー
[STUB - Not implemented] Lightweight architectural decision tracking in Markdown (ADR) format. PROACTIVELY activate for: [TODO: Define on implementation]. Triggers: [TODO: Define on implementation]
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Consolidate and synthesize research outputs from multiple AI models or sources into a unified, pattern-aware, provenance-enriched report with quality metrics. Use when the user has research outputs to consolidate, wants to synthesize multiple reports, asks to "consolidate", "synthesize", or "merge" research findings, or needs to reconcile conflicting information from different sources. Works with outputs from Claude, Gemini, GPT-5.2, or any combination of AI/human sources. Supports manifest-driven (from create-research-brief) and standalone operation.
Designs multi-model AI research strategies across 9 research patterns for Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro Deep Research, and optionally GPT-5.2 Deep Research (with site restrictions and mid-session intervention) or GPT-5.2 Chat. Generates copy-pasteable prompts optimized per model with pattern-aware role assignment, a consolidation manifest for downstream synthesis, and a merge prompt for consolidating outputs. Accepts Research Request Specification from research-interviewer upstream. Triggers on "create research brief", "research plan", "multi-model research", "research prompts for Claude/Gemini/OpenAI", "design research strategy", "consolidate research outputs", "synthesize research results", "research best practices for...", "best practices for [technology]", "create a best practices guide for...", "research [technology] patterns", "document [technology] best practices", "compare X vs Y", "landscape of [domain]", "compliance requirements for [topic]", "ROI analysis for [decision]". Modes: DUAL (Claude+Gemi
Generate reader-centered documentation aligned with the Diátaxis framework and optimized for cognitive load management. Creates tutorials, how-to guides, explanations, and reference documentation with multi-layer quality validation. PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) Write tutorials for learning new skills, (2) Create how-to guides for specific tasks, (3) Write explanations for understanding concepts, (4) Generate reference documentation for APIs or features, (5) Document systems, features, or processes, (6) Create user guides or onboarding documentation. Triggers: "write documentation for", "create docs", "document this", "write a tutorial for", "how-to guide for", "explain [concept]", "reference documentation for", "API docs for", "user guide for", "document the", "create documentation"
Systematic completeness audit of Architecture Documentation using 188-item viewpoint-based checklist, severity-classified gap detection, technical debt indicators, and architecture anti-pattern scanning. Supports TOGAF, C4, arc42, and IEEE 42010 frameworks. PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) Architecture review gates, (2) ADR validation before implementation, (3) C4 diagram completeness check, (4) Technical debt assessment, (5) Pre-implementation validation, (6) Governance compliance audit, (7) Design doc handoff review. Triggers: "audit architecture", "review ADR", "check architecture doc", "validate design doc", "architecture review", "audit C4 diagrams", "check system context", "technical debt assessment", "architecture health check", "governance review", "architecture completeness"
Systematically surface, classify, and stress-test assumptions in decisions, strategies, and plans. Transforms hidden assumptions into visible, testable propositions with load-bearing analysis and counterfactual validation. PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) Pre-commitment decision reviews, (2) Strategy validation before execution, (3) Investment due diligence, (4) Architecture decision records, (5) Product direction pivots, (6) Risk assessments requiring assumption audit. Triggers: "validate assumptions", "test assumptions", "assumption check", "stress test this decision", "what are we assuming", "pre-mortem", "what could go wrong", "challenge this plan", "devil's advocate"
Multi-expert comparison and ranking of options with structured deliberation. PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) decision making between alternatives, (2) trade-off analysis, (3) option evaluation, (4) vendor/tool comparison, (5) strategy selection. Triggers: "compare options", "evaluate alternatives", "rank options", "which should I choose", "compare these", "trade-off analysis", "decision between"
| name | architectural-decision-records |
| version | 0.1 |
| description | [STUB - Not implemented] Lightweight architectural decision tracking in Markdown (ADR) format. PROACTIVELY activate for: [TODO: Define on implementation]. Triggers: [TODO: Define on implementation] |
| core-integration | {"techniques":{"primary":["[TODO]"],"secondary":[]},"contracts":{"input":"[TODO]","output":"[TODO]"},"patterns":"[TODO]","rubrics":"[TODO]"} |
STUB: This skill is not yet implemented
This placeholder preserves the documented plugin structure. See parent plugin README for planned capabilities.
# ADR-001: Use PostgreSQL for Primary Database
## Status
Accepted
## Context
Need scalable relational database with ACID guarantees
## Decision
Use PostgreSQL 15+ for primary data storage
## Consequences
+ Strong ACID compliance
+ Rich ecosystem
- Higher operational complexity than NoSQL