メニュー
SkillsMP は ahrav/scratch-scanner-rs から 61 件の skill を収集しています。skill を開くとソースと詳細を確認できます。
収集済み skill 61 件中 40 件を表示しています。
Write-then-verify documentation pipeline. Use when a user asks to improve comments or docs, explain algorithms or design choices, write or upgrade docstrings, or raise documentation quality for a codebase (especially Rust crates). Writes docs, then…
原文の言語: 英語
Use when you have code review findings, PR comments, or review reports that need to be systematically addressed — especially when there are multiple findings across different files and severities
原文の言語: 英語
Use when creating any beads task — auto-researches the codebase, links related tasks, and produces a rich self-contained description from a structured template. Accepts minimal intent and outputs a complete task ready for agent implementation.
原文の言語: 英語
Use when you have code review findings, PR comments, or review reports that need to be systematically addressed — especially when there are multiple findings across different files and severities
原文の言語: 英語
Use when a task needs an implementation plan that is iteratively created and stress-tested through review-and-revise cycles before implementation begins — catches blind spots, incorrect codebase assumptions, unnecessary complexity, and performance pitfalls…
原文の言語: 英語
Use when a markdown plan file exists and needs validation before implementation — catches design flaws, logic holes, footguns, unnecessary complexity, and performance concerns while changes are still cheap
原文の言語: 英語
Use when a task needs an implementation plan that is iteratively created and stress-tested through review-and-revise cycles before implementation begins — catches blind spots, incorrect codebase assumptions, unnecessary complexity, and performance pitfalls…
原文の言語: 英語
Consolidate verbose test suites by replacing repetitive unit tests with property-based tests, parameterized tests (rstest), or fuzz tests. Less code to maintain, same or better coverage.
原文の言語: 英語
Write-then-verify documentation pipeline — a doc-rigor agent writes/improves docs, then a separate fresh doc-verify agent checks accuracy against code reality with zero confirmation bias
原文の言語: 英語
Verify documentation accuracy against code reality and external claims — runs as a fresh agent after /doc-rigor to prevent confirmation bias
原文の言語: 英語
Run Jepsen-style cluster tests using Maelstrom (lightweight) or full Jepsen (heavyweight) — validates correctness of the deployed gossip-rs system with real network behavior, complementing in-process DST
原文の言語: 英語
Simulation-testability code review — enforces DST-compatible patterns in coordination, gossip, and pipeline code based on FoundationDB, TigerBeetle, sled, and Firezone evidence
原文の言語: 英語
Run deterministic simulation tests with progressive difficulty levels (sunny/stormy/radioactive) inspired by TigerBeetle VOPR — orchestrates seed management, workload selection, and invariant verification
原文の言語: 英語
Scaffold simulation-testable modules with sans-IO pattern, proptest state machine tests, and fault injection points — prevents retrofitting costs by making code DST-ready from the start
原文の言語: 英語
SIMD vectorization for Rust — detects ISA features, identifies vectorizable patterns, generates platform-specific intrinsics (ARM NEON/SVE, x86 SSE/AVX/AVX-512), validates correctness and performance. Uses tiered research with baked-in references and…
原文の言語: 英語
Comprehensive review of unsafe code — audits safety invariants, demands benchmark+ASM proof of performance benefit, and verifies Miri/Kani/fuzz/property test coverage for every unsafe block
原文の言語: 英語
Verify documentation accuracy against code reality and external claims — runs as a fresh agent after /doc-rigor to prevent confirmation bias
原文の言語: 英語
Comprehensive 6-phase research funnel — 8-10 parallel survey agents sweep wide, a synthesizer compiles evidence, deep-dive and adversarial agents run in parallel to elaborate and challenge findings, a final synthesizer reconciles everything, and an integrator…
原文の言語: 英語
Distributed systems design and implementation auditor — enforces evidence-backed coordination decisions, citation requirements, invariant tracking, and correctness verification against academic literature, battle-tested systems, and the project's locked…
原文の言語: 英語
Run Jepsen-style cluster tests using Maelstrom (lightweight) or full Jepsen (heavyweight) — validates correctness of the deployed gossip-rs system with real network behavior, complementing in-process DST
原文の言語: 英語
Use when designing safe public APIs that wrap unsafe Rust code, adding unsafe blocks to existing types, reviewing unsafe code for soundness, or creating new types backed by raw pointers, MaybeUninit, or FFI
原文の言語: 英語
Simulation-testability code review — enforces DST-compatible patterns in coordination, gossip, and pipeline code based on FoundationDB, TigerBeetle, sled, and Firezone evidence
原文の言語: 英語
Run deterministic simulation tests with progressive difficulty levels (sunny/stormy/radioactive) inspired by TigerBeetle VOPR — orchestrates seed management, workload selection, and invariant verification
原文の言語: 英語
Scaffold simulation-testable modules with sans-IO pattern, proptest state machine tests, and fault injection points — prevents retrofitting costs by making code DST-ready from the start
原文の言語: 英語
Assess and recommend the appropriate testing strategy for Rust code - unit tests, parameterized tests (rstest), property-based tests, fuzz tests, Kani model checking, or simulation testing
原文の言語: 英語
SIMD vectorization for Rust — detects ISA features, identifies vectorizable patterns, generates platform-specific intrinsics (ARM NEON/SVE, x86 SSE/AVX/AVX-512), validates correctness and performance. Uses tiered research with baked-in references and…
原文の言語: 英語
Comprehensive review of unsafe code — audits safety invariants, demands benchmark+ASM proof of performance benefit, and verifies Miri/Kani/fuzz/property test coverage for every unsafe block
原文の言語: 英語
ASM-guided deep performance optimization. Collects assembly, audits codegen quality, applies targeted transforms, validates with benchmarks. Uses cargo-show-asm + Criterion as ground truth.
原文の言語: 英語
ASM-guided deep performance optimization. Collects assembly, audits codegen quality, applies targeted transforms, validates with benchmarks. Uses cargo-show-asm + Criterion as ground truth.
原文の言語: 英語
Respond to PR review comments by verifying bug reports with failing tests before fixing code — never blindly trust a reviewer
原文の言語: 英語
Use when the user wants a minimal source-only archive for upload or checkpoint. Creates a tar.gz with just src/ and tests/ directories.
原文の言語: 英語
Run Criterion benchmarks with baseline comparison for performance optimization work
原文の言語: 英語
Deep research before design — 3-5 parallel research agents survey papers, production systems, failure modes, and prior art, then a synthesizer compiles evidence, and an integrator maps findings to a concrete codebase plan with citations
原文の言語: 英語
Run a parallel diverge-then-converge design tournament — 3-5 independent agents explore a problem, then 2 ranking agents evaluate and stack-rank the results with confidence scores
原文の言語: 英語
Review Rust interfaces for ease of correct use and resistance to misuse, applying "make interfaces easy to use correctly and hard to use incorrectly"
原文の言語: 英語
Deep Linux perf profiling — PMU counters, topdown analysis, flamegraphs, and annotated hotspot drill-down on ARM/Graviton
原文の言語: 英語
Performance regression testing workflow for hot path changes
原文の言語: 英語
Analyze Rust code for performance issues, allocation hot spots, and optimization opportunities
原文の言語: 英語
Parallel specialist code review — 6 focused agents (correctness, design, performance, safety, docs, complexity) diverge independently, then a single ranker merges findings into an importance-ranked report with confidence scores
原文の言語: 英語
Workflow for modifying and benchmarking detection rules
原文の言語: 英語