ワンクリックで
gds-performance-test
Design game performance testing strategy. Use when the user says "performance test" or "benchmark"
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Design game performance testing strategy. Use when the user says "performance test" or "benchmark"
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Game designer for creative vision, GDD creation, and narrative design. Use when the user asks to talk to Samus Shepard or requests the Game Designer.
Consolidated game developer for story execution, code implementation, code review, QA/test authorship, and sprint orchestration. Use when the user asks to talk to Link Freeman, the Game Developer, the Game QA, or the Game Scrum Master.
Elite indie game developer for rapid prototyping and solo quick-flow development. Use when the user asks to talk to Indie or requests the Game Solo Dev.
Facilitate game brainstorming sessions with game-specific techniques. Use when the user says "brainstorm game" or "game ideas"
Verify GDD, UX, Architecture, and Epics alignment before production. Use when the user says "check readiness" or "implementation readiness"
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"
| name | gds-performance-test |
| description | Design game performance testing strategy. Use when the user says "performance test" or "benchmark" |
Goal: Design a comprehensive performance testing strategy covering frame rate, memory usage, loading times, and platform-specific requirements. Performance directly impacts player experience — this workflow produces a concrete plan with automated tests, benchmark scenarios, and platform matrices.
Your Role: You are a senior game performance engineer and QA strategist. Work with the user to identify their platforms, performance requirements, and representative content, then produce a strategy that combines automated profiling, manual testing checklists, and CI-integrated benchmarks.
template.md) resolve from the skill root.{skill-root} resolves to this skill's installed directory (where customize.toml lives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name} resolves to the skill directory's basename.Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml — defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml — team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml — personal overridesAny missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/gds/config.yaml and resolve:
project_nameuser_namecommunication_languageoutput_folderGreet {user_name}, speaking in {communication_language}.
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.
Activation is complete. Begin the workflow below.
This uses an inline workflow pattern for autonomous execution:
knowledge/performance-testing.mdBefore proceeding, verify:
installed_path = {skill_root}validation = {installed_path}/checklist.mdtemplate = {installed_path}/performance-template.mddefault_output_file = {output_folder}/performance-test-plan.mdtarget_fps = 60 (configurable per platform in Step 1)target_platform = auto (options: auto, pc, console, mobile)game_engine = auto (options: auto, unity, unreal, godot)| Platform | Target FPS | Minimum FPS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC (High) | 60+ | 30 | Uncapped option |
| PC (Low) | 30 | 30 | Scalable settings |
| PS5/Xbox X | 60 | 60 | Performance mode |
| PS4/Xbox One | 30 | 30 | Locked |
| Switch Docked | 30 | 30 | Stable |
| Switch Handheld | 30 | 25 | Power saving |
| Mobile (High) | 60 | 30 | Device dependent |
| Mobile (Standard) | 30 | 30 | Thermal throttling |
Filter this table to the user's actual target platforms. Adjust targets based on game genre and user input. Establish memory budgets per target platform:
| Platform | Total RAM | Game Budget | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC (Min spec) | 8 GB | 4 GB | Leave room for OS |
| PS5 | 16 GB | 12 GB | Unified memory |
| Xbox Series X | 16 GB | 13 GB | With Smart Delivery |
| Switch | 4 GB | 2.5 GB | Tight constraints |
| Mobile | 4-6 GB | 1.5-2 GB | Background apps |
| Scenario | Target | Maximum |
|---|---|---|
| Initial boot | < 10s | 30s |
| Level load | < 15s | 30s |
| Fast travel | < 5s | 10s |
| Respawn | < 3s | 5s |
Adjust based on genre (e.g., fast travel may not apply to linear games).
Define stress test scenarios for frame rate validation: ``` SCENARIO: Maximum Entity Count GIVEN game level with normal enemy spawn WHEN enemy count reaches 50+ THEN frame rate stays above minimum AND no visual artifacts AND audio doesn't stutterSCENARIO: Particle System Stress GIVEN combat with multiple effects WHEN 20+ particle systems active THEN frame rate degradation < 20% AND memory allocation stable
SCENARIO: Draw Call Stress GIVEN level with maximum visible geometry WHEN camera shows worst-case view THEN frame rate stays above minimum AND no hitching or stuttering
</action>
<action>Define memory test scenarios:
SCENARIO: Extended Play Session GIVEN game running for 4+ hours WHEN normal gameplay occurs THEN memory usage remains stable AND no memory leaks detected AND no crash from fragmentation
SCENARIO: Level Transition GIVEN player completes level WHEN transitioning to new level THEN previous level fully unloaded AND memory baseline returns AND no cumulative growth
</action>
<action>Define loading test scenarios:
SCENARIO: Cold Boot GIVEN game not in memory WHEN launching game THEN reaches interactive state in < target AND loading feedback shown AND no apparent hang
SCENARIO: Save/Load Performance GIVEN large save file (max progress) WHEN loading save THEN completes in < target AND no corruption AND gameplay resumes smoothly
</action>
<action>Adapt scenario details to match the specific game type and identified systems</action>
</step>
<step n="3" goal="Define Test Methodology">
<action>Generate automated performance test code for the detected engine</action>
<check if="engine == 'unity'">
<action>Generate Unity Performance Test Runner examples:
```csharp
[UnityTest]
public IEnumerator Performance_CombatScene_MaintainsFPS()
{
using (Measure.ProfilerMarkers(new[] { "Main Thread" }))
{
SceneManager.LoadScene("CombatStressTest");
yield return new WaitForSeconds(30f);
}
var metrics = Measure.Custom(new SampleGroupDefinition("FPS"));
Assert.Greater(metrics.Median, 30, "FPS should stay above 30");
}
</action>
Generate Unreal Automation test examples:
```cpp
bool FPerformanceTest::RunTest(const FString& Parameters)
{
float StartTime = FPlatformTime::Seconds();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
GetWorld()->SpawnActor();
float FrameTime = FApp::GetDeltaTime();
TestTrue("Frame time under budget", FrameTime < 0.033f);
return true;
}
```
Generate Godot benchmark test examples:
```gdscript
func test_performance_entity_stress():
var frame_times = []
for i in range(100):
var entity = stress_entity.instantiate()
add_child(entity)
for i in range(300):
await get_tree().process_frame
frame_times.append(Performance.get_monitor(Performance.TIME_PROCESS))
var avg_frame_time = frame_times.reduce(func(a, b): return a + b) / frame_times.size()
assert_lt(avg_frame_time, 0.033, "Average frame time under 33ms (30 FPS)")
```
Define manual profiling checklists:
CPU Profiling
GPU Profiling
Memory Profiling
| Benchmark | Purpose | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Combat Stress | Max entities, effects | 60s |
| Open World | Draw distance, streaming | 120s |
| Menu Navigation | UI performance | 30s |
| Save/Load | Persistence performance | 30s |
Adapt benchmark names and durations to match the actual game content. Define baseline capture process: 1. Run benchmarks on reference hardware (document hardware specs) 2. Record baseline metrics (avg FPS, P95 frame time, peak memory) 3. Set regression thresholds (e.g., 10% FPS degradation = fail, 5% memory growth = fail) 4. Integrate benchmarks into CI pipeline as gated checks
Define platform-specific testing requirements for each target platform PC testing requirements: - Test across min/recommended hardware specs - Verify quality settings (Low/Medium/High/Ultra) all perform within budget - Check VRAM usage at each quality tier - Test at multiple resolutions (1080p, 1440p, 4K) Console testing requirements: - Test in both Performance and Quality modes if applicable - Verify thermal throttling behavior during extended sessions - Check suspend/resume impact on frame rate and memory - Test with varying storage speeds (internal SSD vs extended storage) Mobile testing requirements: - Test on low/mid/high tier representative devices - Monitor thermal throttling onset time and severity - Measure battery drain per hour of gameplay - Test with background apps consuming memory Load `{template}` and use it as the structural foundation for the output document Compile all information from Steps 1-5 into a comprehensive Performance Test Plan at `{default_output_file}` with this structure:# Performance Test Plan: {project_name}
## Performance Targets
[FPS tables filtered to target platforms]
[Memory budget tables]
[Loading time targets]
## Test Scenarios
### Frame Rate Tests
[Stress test scenarios from Step 2]
### Memory Tests
[Extended play and leak detection scenarios]
### Loading Tests
[Boot, level load, save/load scenarios]
## Methodology
### Automated Tests
[Engine-specific code examples]
[CI integration instructions]
### Manual Profiling
[Checklists from Step 3]
[Tools to use per engine]
## Benchmark Suite
[Benchmark definitions from Step 4]
[Baseline capture process]
[Regression thresholds]
## Platform Matrix
[Platform-specific requirements from Step 5]
## Regression Criteria
[Quantified thresholds: FPS drop %, memory growth %, load time delta]
[CI gate configuration]
## Schedule
[When performance tests run: nightly, per-sprint, pre-release]
[Who reviews results and owns regressions]
Load and apply `{validation}` checklist to verify all deliverables are complete
Present a summary of what was produced and the recommended next steps to the user
Run: `python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete` — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.