メニュー
Verify every task in tasks.md maps to at least one FR/SC and every FR/SC has at least one task; surface gaps before implementation begins.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | specrew-traceability-check |
| description | Verify every task in tasks.md maps to at least one FR/SC and every FR/SC has at least one task; surface gaps before implementation begins. |
| domain | lifecycle-after-tasks |
| confidence | high |
| source | Specrew governance pillar — after-tasks ceremony helper |
Type: Analysis Skill
Schema: v1
Status: Active planning/review method
Validate that the plan is safe to execute by proving every task traces to authority and every in-scope requirement has coverage.
| Input | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| iteration_plan_path | path | Yes | Path to iterations/NNN/plan.md |
| spec_path | path | Yes | Path to the authoritative spec file |
| requirement_scope | array? | No | Optional filter for specific requirements |
| Output | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| verdict | enum: PASS, FAIL | Traceability check result |
| coverage_ratio | float | Percentage of requirements with tasks |
| orphan_tasks[] | array | Tasks with missing or invalid requirement refs |
| uncovered_requirements[] | array | Requirements with no tasks |
| partial_requirements[] | array | Requirements partially implemented |
| fix_actions[] | array | Plan edits required before execution can begin |
None. This is a pre-execution gate.
iteration_plan_path is missing: return FAIL with plan file missingspec_path is missing: return FAIL with spec file missingThe result must be strong enough to block planning if the plan is not contract-safe.
Run live continuous co-review or replay persisted reviewer evidence for an iteration.
Run live continuous co-review or replay persisted reviewer evidence for an iteration.
Run live continuous co-review or replay persisted reviewer evidence for an iteration.
Perform a Specrew human-verdict boundary stop on the Claude host. Renders the FULL Rule 46 six-section human re-entry packet AND the verdict options as one Markdown message, with the AskUserQuestion picker disabled so the packet cannot collapse into the picker's short header/option fields. Invoke at EVERY human-judgment boundary stop (specify, clarify, plan, tasks, before-implement, implement, review, retro, feature-closeout, lifecycle-end). Triggers: boundary stop, verdict, approve / redirect / send back, why I stopped, human re-entry packet, gate stop.
{what this skill teaches agents}
Run Specrew's per-lens design workshop and collaborative design-analysis. Use whenever you work the design lenses for a feature: at specify/intake (the lens workshop) and at the design-analysis stop (co-design the architecture), and RE-INVOKE at the start of EACH new lens (architecture, data, ui-ux, security, integration, devops, requirements/NFR, observability, component). Triggers: design, design lens, lens workshop, design-analysis, architecture, trade-offs, co-design, explore options, decompose, or moving from one lens to the next. Tells you to facilitate each lens as a discussion, surface diagrams the human can actually SEE (console ASCII inline; mermaid/html to a file with a clickable file:/// link), co-design components/responsibilities/flows WITH the human instead of handing over finished options, capture the agreements, and which per-lens md to load.