| name | litestar-middleware |
| description | Design and apply Litestar middleware for cross-cutting concerns such as CORS, CSRF, allowed-host checks, compression, rate limiting, logging, sessions, request enrichment, policy enforcement, and custom ASGI pipeline control. Use when behavior must wrap broad route sets consistently across the ASGI stack. Do not use for route-specific business rules, simple response mutation better handled by lifecycle hooks, or auth/guard policy work that belongs in security-focused skills. |
Middleware
Execution Workflow
- Confirm the requirement is really middleware-worthy: broad ASGI wrapping, not route business logic.
- Prefer built-in config-based middleware first.
- Choose the right layer and ordering deliberately.
- Decide whether the concern belongs in middleware, lifecycle hooks, or route logic.
- For custom middleware, choose the simplest correct implementation style.
- Validate both success and exception-generated responses, plus exclusions and scope handling.
Core Rules
- Keep middleware focused on one cross-cutting concern.
- Prefer built-in middleware/config objects before creating custom implementations.
- Treat middleware order as part of API behavior.
- Keep middleware scope-aware for
http, websocket, and lifespan as needed.
- Use lifecycle hooks when the job is response-object mutation rather than ASGI message wrapping.
- Keep middleware non-blocking and ASGI-compliant.
- Keep
404 and 405 expectations explicit because those router-generated exceptions occur before the middleware stack.
Decision Guide
- Use built-in config middleware for CORS, CSRF, compression, rate limiting, logging, sessions, and allowed hosts.
- Use a middleware factory for very small wrappers.
- Use
ASGIMiddleware for configurable production custom middleware.
- Use
MiddlewareProtocol for minimal low-level behavior.
- Use
AbstractMiddleware only for compatibility or migration scenarios.
- Use
DefineMiddleware when constructor-style args must be supplied to a middleware factory or class.
- Use
litestar-lifecycle-hooks instead when the behavior belongs to after_request, before_send, or related hook stages.
Reference Files
Read only the sections you need:
Recommended Defaults
- Start with one middleware concern at a time.
- Keep built-in config values explicit and reviewed.
- Keep exclusions and
opt-based skips narrow and tested.
- Make ordering assumptions visible in code comments only when they are truly non-obvious.
- Test middleware against both successful and failing downstream handlers.
Anti-Patterns
- Putting route-specific business rules into middleware.
- Creating custom middleware when a built-in config or lifecycle hook already fits.
- Ignoring middleware order when several wrappers interact.
- Mutating request or response state at the wrong ASGI stage.
- Assuming router-generated
404 and 405 pass through middleware.
- Letting middleware silently depend on undocumented
opt exclusions or path patterns.
Validation Checklist
- Confirm middleware is attached at the intended layer only.
- Confirm order matches both layer precedence and list order.
- Confirm exclusions via path patterns,
exclude_opt_key, or scopes behave as intended.
- Confirm behavior is correct for both success and exception-generated responses.
- Confirm
404 and 405 behavior is handled at the right boundary.
- Confirm custom middleware remains ASGI-compliant and non-blocking.
- Confirm built-in security and logging middleware settings align with deployment expectations.
Cross-Skill Handoffs
- Use
litestar-lifecycle-hooks for hook-stage logic rather than raw ASGI wrapping.
- Use
litestar-authentication, litestar-security, litestar-logging, and litestar-metrics for domain-specific middleware outcomes.
- Use
litestar-debugging when middleware interactions are the source of a runtime defect.
- Use
litestar-routing when middleware behavior depends on layer placement or opt strategy.
Litestar References