writing-skills

name	writing-skills
description	Guidelines for creating, reviewing, and improving agent skills.

Writing Skills

This skill governs how agent skills are authored and audited. It contains two paths: a Creation path for new skills, and a Review path for existing skills. The Inlined Expertise doctrine from DEVELOPMENT.md applies — critical SOPs live in SKILL.md, not in references/.

Creation Path

1. Elicit

Ask 1–3 high-value questions before drafting. Probe intent, scope, target audience, prior attempts, and related skills. Avoid open-ended questions that invite the user to dump context; ask for the specific decision-blocking information.

2. Tentative Frame

Propose a hypothesis about scope, name, and shape. Give the user something concrete to disagree with. Frame as a starting point, not a finished design.

3. Refine

Iterate: propose → correct → revise. Show what changed between iterations so the user can audit the reasoning. Each iteration should narrow scope or sharpen wording, not expand.

4. Converge

Land on a 1–2 sentence problem statement, explicit scope boundaries, and at least one acknowledged constraint. State the proposed skill name, target repo, and parent directory.

5. Confirm and Draft

Ask the user: "Want me to draft the SKILL.md?" Do not write the file until they confirm. When they do, draft to the agreed location and present the result.

Review Path

When asked to review, audit, check, or improve an existing SKILL.md, run the gates below against it. Output enumerated findings only; do not render pass/fail verdicts. The user decides what to act on.

1. Frontmatter

• name is lowercase-hyphenated and matches the parent directory name exactly.
• description is a single declarative sentence stating what the skill does and when to use it.
• No extraneous fields. This repo's house style uses only name and description — no license, metadata, compatibility, or allowed-tools.

2. Trigger Quality

• Would the description fire on the right user prompts? Test against hypothetical phrasings ("create a skill for X", "review the X skill", "improve X").
• Could the description undertrigger on implicit requests? If so, surface that as a finding; do not silently expand the description.

3. Length and Shape

• Body is under ~150 lines. If longer, offload detail to references/.
• Title is # <Capitalized Skill Name>.

4. Tone and Rationale

• Imperative voice throughout.
• Every MUST/NEVER is paired with a why so the model can reason about edge cases rather than blindly obey. Bare "NEVER do X" without explanation is a finding.

5. Scope Tightness

• The skill addresses a single concern. Kitchen-sink skills that try to cover multiple domains are a finding.

6. References

• Linked files exist, use relative paths from the skill root, and are one-level deep (no nested chains).

Definition of Done

A skill is complete when:

• It contains the most frequent SOPs directly in SKILL.md — critical instructions are not buried in references/.
• It matches the conventions of sibling skills in the same repo (frontmatter shape, length budget, tone).
• The Review path's six gates pass when applied to the new skill itself.