architecture-decision-records

name	architecture-decision-records
description	Use when documenting architectural decisions, comparing technology options, or recording rationale for framework choices.
allowed-tools	Read, Write, WebSearch

Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

This skill provides guidance on documenting architectural decisions using the ADR format, ensuring all significant choices are recorded with context, rationale, and consequences.

---

What is an ADR?

An Architecture Decision Record captures:

• Context: Why was this decision needed?
• Decision: What was decided?
• Consequences: What are the implications?

ADRs create a decision history that:

• Explains why the system is the way it is
• Helps new team members understand choices
• Prevents revisiting already-decided topics
• Provides audit trail for compliance

---

ADR Template

# ADR-{NNN}: {Title}

**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** PROPOSED | ACCEPTED | DEPRECATED | SUPERSEDED
**Deciders:** {Who made this decision}

## Context

{Describe the situation that requires a decision. What is the problem?
What forces are at play? What constraints exist?}

## Decision

{State the decision clearly. Use active voice: "We will..."}

## Alternatives Considered

### Alternative 1: {Name}
- **Description:** {What is this option?}
- **Pros:**
  - {Pro 1}
  - {Pro 2}
- **Cons:**
  - {Con 1}
  - {Con 2}
- **Source:** {URL to official documentation}

### Alternative 2: {Name}
- **Description:** {What is this option?}
- **Pros:**
  - {Pro 1}
- **Cons:**
  - {Con 1}
- **Source:** {URL}

## Rationale

{Why was this option chosen over others? What tipped the balance?}

## Consequences

### Positive
- {Positive consequence 1}
- {Positive consequence 2}

### Negative
- {Negative consequence 1}
- {Trade-off accepted}

### Neutral
- {Other implications}

## Related Decisions
- ADR-{NNN}: {Related decision}

## References
- {URL 1}
- {URL 2}

---

ADR Lifecycle

PROPOSED → ACCEPTED → [DEPRECATED | SUPERSEDED]
    ↓          ↓              ↓
 Rejected   In effect    Replaced by new ADR

Status Definitions

Status	Meaning
PROPOSED	Under discussion, not yet decided
ACCEPTED	Decision made, in effect
DEPRECATED	No longer relevant (system changed)
SUPERSEDED	Replaced by a newer ADR

---

Numbering Scheme

ADR-{Category}{Sequence}

Categories:
  0XX - Project Setup (tooling, CI/CD)
  1XX - Architecture (patterns, structure)
  2XX - Technology (frameworks, libraries)
  3XX - Data (database, storage)
  4XX - Security (auth, encryption)
  5XX - Integration (APIs, third-party)
  6XX - Operations (deployment, monitoring)

Examples:
  ADR-001 - Use TypeScript
  ADR-101 - Adopt Hexagonal Architecture
  ADR-201 - Choose React for Frontend
  ADR-301 - Use PostgreSQL for Primary Database
  ADR-401 - Implement JWT Authentication

---

When to Write an ADR

Write an ADR when:

Scenario	Example
Choosing technology	Database, framework, library
Architecture pattern	Microservices vs monolith
Significant trade-off	Performance vs maintainability
Breaking change	Major API redesign
Security decision	Authentication method
Reversing previous decision	Changing database

Don't write ADRs for:

• Trivial choices (variable naming)
• Temporary solutions (hotfixes)
• Already-standard practices

---

ADR Examples

ADR-301: Use PostgreSQL for Primary Database

Date: 2025-01-03 Status: ACCEPTED Deciders: Framework Orchestrator, User

Context

The application needs a primary database for storing user data, tasks, and relationships. The data is highly relational with complex queries needed. Expected scale is 100K users initially, growing to 1M.

Decision

We will use PostgreSQL as the primary database.

Alternatives Considered

Alternative 1: PostgreSQL

• Description: Open-source relational database
• Pros:
  • Excellent for relational data
  • Strong ACID compliance
  • Mature ecosystem
  • JSON support for flexibility
• Cons:
  • Requires schema management
  • Horizontal scaling more complex
• Source: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/intro-whatis.html

Alternative 2: MongoDB

• Description: Document-oriented NoSQL database
• Pros:
  • Flexible schema
  • Easy horizontal scaling
  • Good for unstructured data
• Cons:
  • Weaker for relational data
  • ACID only at document level
  • Query complexity for joins
• Source: https://www.mongodb.com/docs/

Rationale

Our data model is inherently relational (users have tasks, tasks have subtasks, etc.). PostgreSQL's strong ACID compliance and mature tooling outweigh MongoDB's flexibility benefits for this use case. The JSON column type provides flexibility where needed.

Consequences

Positive

• Strong data integrity
• Complex queries are efficient
• Well-understood by developers

Negative

• Need to manage migrations
• More upfront schema design required

Neutral

• Will use Prisma ORM for type-safe access

References

• https://www.postgresql.org/docs/
• https://www.prisma.io/docs/

---

Integration with Framework Developer

During Phase 1 (Discovery)

Record decisions about:

• Target platform
• Core technology choices
• Development approach

During Phase 2 (Structure)

Record decisions about:

• Architecture pattern
• Module boundaries
• Key abstractions

During Phase 3 (Planning)

Record decisions about:

• API design approach
• Data models
• Security strategy

Storage Location

All ADRs go in: .framework-blueprints/01-discovery/decisions-log.md

Or as individual files:

.framework-blueprints/
└── decisions/
    ├── ADR-001-typescript.md
    ├── ADR-101-hexagonal-architecture.md
    └── ADR-301-postgresql.md

---

Quick ADR Template

For rapid documentation during sessions:

### D{NNN}: {Title}

**Chose:** {Option}
**Over:** {Rejected options}
**Because:** {One-line rationale}
**Source:** {URL}
**Trade-off:** {What we accept}

---

ADR Review Checklist

Before finalizing an ADR:

• Context clearly explains the problem
• All reasonable alternatives listed
• Each alternative has pros/cons
• Sources are cited
• Decision is clearly stated
• Rationale explains why
• Consequences are realistic
• Related ADRs are linked

---

Updating ADRs

Superseding a Decision

When a decision needs to change:

1. Create new ADR with new decision
2. Update old ADR status to SUPERSEDED
3. Add link to new ADR

**Status:** SUPERSEDED by ADR-302

Deprecating a Decision

When a decision is no longer relevant:

1. Update status to DEPRECATED
2. Add note explaining why

**Status:** DEPRECATED
**Note:** Feature was removed in v2.0