メニュー
Analyze patent claims against prior art using 35 U.S.C. 102/103 framework. Use when the user wants prior art analysis, novelty assessment, or obviousness evaluation.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Categorize a patent by technology area using a custom taxonomy. Use when the user wants to classify or categorize patents in a portfolio.
Map patent claims to product features for infringement analysis. Use when the user wants a claim chart, infringement analysis, or to map claims against a product.
Draft patent claims from an invention disclosure. Use when the user wants to draft claims, write claims from a disclosure, or generate patent claims for a new invention.
Extract key technical concepts from patent claims. Use when the user wants to identify the core inventive concepts or technical approaches in a patent.
Identify opportunities for broadened continuation claims from an existing patent. Use when the user wants to broaden claim scope in a continuation application.
Draft continuation claims targeting a specific competitor product. Use when the user wants to write continuation claims aimed at a particular product or company.
| name | prior-art-analysis |
| description | Analyze patent claims against prior art using 35 U.S.C. 102/103 framework. Use when the user wants prior art analysis, novelty assessment, or obviousness evaluation. |
Analyze independent patent claims against prior art using the full 35 U.S.C. 102 (anticipation) and 103 (obviousness) framework, including Graham v. John Deere factors and KSR rationales.
This skill benefits from web search to find relevant prior art references.
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../pre-filing/prior-art-analysis/prompt.md--- delimiters)$ARGUMENTS:
{{PLACEHOLDER}} values with the user's content